Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
SAYNOTO0870.COM

<---- Back to main website

 
Home Help Search Login Register

Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
BT No Longer Required To Give Indirect Access (Read 19,939 times)
bigjohn
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 2,316
Gender: male
BT No Longer Required To Give Indirect Access
Sep 28th, 2013 at 2:43am
 
"we are removing BT's obligation to offer carrier pre-selection (CPS) and indirect access (IA) where BT's retail arm provides the retail access line;"

http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/consultations/nmr-13/statement/statement-summar...
Back to top
« Last Edit: Sep 28th, 2013 at 2:45am by bigjohn »  

BJ.
 
IP Logged
 
bigjohn
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 2,316
Gender: male
Re: BT No Longer Required To Give Indirect Access
Reply #1 - Sep 28th, 2013 at 2:48am
 
Applies from 1/10/2013  i see

Wonder if BT will start to block indirect access and cps in due course.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Sep 28th, 2013 at 2:48am by bigjohn »  

BJ.
 
IP Logged
 
derrick
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1,124
Re: BT No Longer Required To Give Indirect Access
Reply #2 - Sep 28th, 2013 at 9:43am
 
bigjohn wrote on Sep 28th, 2013 at 2:48am:
Applies from 1/10/2013  i see

Wonder if BT will start to block indirect access and cps in due course.



I think that will be a definite yes, anything to screw their customers, I understand they are raising their prices, including line rental, by around 6% in January 2014!

.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
sherbert
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 2,011
Gender: male
Re: BT No Longer Required To Give Indirect Access
Reply #3 - Sep 28th, 2013 at 10:16am
 
bigjohn wrote on Sep 28th, 2013 at 2:48am:
Applies from 1/10/2013  i see

Wonder if BT will start to block indirect access and cps in due course.




I know I am probably being a bit dense here  but what does all mean to 'Joe Public'? Embarrassed
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
bigjohn
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 2,316
Gender: male
Re: BT No Longer Required To Give Indirect Access
Reply #4 - Sep 28th, 2013 at 10:44am
 
sherbert wrote on Sep 28th, 2013 at 10:16am:
bigjohn wrote on Sep 28th, 2013 at 2:48am:
Applies from 1/10/2013  i see

Wonder if BT will start to block indirect access and cps in due course.




I know I am probably being a bit dense here  but what does all mean to 'Joe Public'? Embarrassed


Hi Sherbert.

What it means if they block IA indirect access people would not be able to call short codes like 18185/1899/18866 to make cheaper calls. They should however be able to use the services via there freephone numbers but calls although cheaper then BT  would be dearer then indirect access.

Eg. 30 minute geographical call via 18185 cost 5p,same call via 0808 freephone 35p.

The likes of Talk Talk already block these numbers.

Blocking of CPS would mean you can no longer have your line rental with BT and get cheaper calls from another supplier.

Hope that helps. Smiley
Back to top
« Last Edit: Sep 28th, 2013 at 10:45am by bigjohn »  

BJ.
 
IP Logged
 
sherbert
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 2,011
Gender: male
Re: BT No Longer Required To Give Indirect Access
Reply #5 - Sep 28th, 2013 at 12:05pm
 
bigjohn wrote on Sep 28th, 2013 at 10:44am:
sherbert wrote on Sep 28th, 2013 at 10:16am:
bigjohn wrote on Sep 28th, 2013 at 2:48am:
Applies from 1/10/2013  i see

Wonder if BT will start to block indirect access and cps in due course.




I know I am probably being a bit dense here  but what does all mean to 'Joe Public'? Embarrassed


Hi Sherbert.

What it means if they block IA indirect access people would not be able to call short codes like 18185/1899/18866 to make cheaper calls. They should however be able to use the services via there freephone numbers but calls although cheaper then BT  would be dearer then indirect access.

Eg. 30 minute geographical call via 18185 cost 5p,same call via 0808 freephone 35p.

The likes of Talk Talk already block these numbers.

Blocking of CPS would mean you can no longer have your line rental with BT and get cheaper calls from another supplier.

Hope that helps. Smiley



Indeed it does bigjohn. Thanks very much for the explaination. Wink
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
kasg
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 320
West Sussex
Gender: male
Re: BT No Longer Required To Give Indirect Access
Reply #6 - Sep 28th, 2013 at 7:15pm
 
We might end up with the bizarre situation where BT blocks them but BT's subsidiary, Plusnet, doesn't.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Heinz
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1,362
Essex
Re: BT No Longer Required To Give Indirect Access
Reply #7 - Oct 2nd, 2013 at 9:11am
 
kasg wrote on Sep 28th, 2013 at 7:15pm:
We might end up with the bizarre situation where BT blocks them but BT's subsidiary, Plusnet, doesn't.

As I have a BT line and use (Primus Penny Mobile 2) CPS (and 18185 for my non-inclusive calls), I'll be changing line rental if that happens.
Back to top
 

After years of ignoring govt. guidelines & RIPPING OFF Council Tax payers using 0845 numbers, Essex County Council changed to 0345 numbers on 2 November 2015
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Dave
Global Moderator
*****
Offline



Posts: 9,902
Yorkshire
Gender: male
Re: BT No Longer Required To Give Indirect Access
Reply #8 - Oct 10th, 2013 at 9:35pm
 
In the days of a monopoly provider of telephone lines Indirect Access (IA) and Carrier Pre-Select (CPS) allowed subscribers to place calls with other operators.

Ofcom has recently found that BT no longer has a Significant Market Power in the fixed voice retail calls market, and no other telco does either. For that reason the regulatory requirement for BT to allow its customers to access IA and CPS was dropped.

IA and CPS will only exist when there are providers of lines that allow access to them. The fewer telephone users who can access them the less worthwhile it must be for them to operate. So if BT does decide to cease allowing access, it will be pulling the plug on a significant number of customers to these providers.

It is to be expected that a telecommunications provider isn't likely to wish its customers make calls with others operators. For that reason the days of the IA and CPS models would appear to be numbered, unless providers are compelled to allow access. The question is: could IA services operate on geographic or 03 numbers?

A similar situation exists with some mobile operators not permitting use of VoIP services.


If BT were to stop allowing access to IA and CPS services it would not be "blocking" them as such, but rather it would be ceasing the allowance of access to them, which it has been compelled to do up to now.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 10th, 2013 at 9:35pm by Dave »  
 
IP Logged
 
loddon
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 599
Reading  UK
Gender: male
Re: BT No Longer Required To Give Indirect Access
Reply #9 - Oct 11th, 2013 at 6:51am
 
Heinz wrote on Oct 2nd, 2013 at 9:11am:
As I have a BT line and use (Primus Penny Mobile 2) CPS (and 18185 for my non-inclusive calls), I'll be changing line rental if that happens.


Heinz, don't do that -- have a look at Callsdiscount.com :---
http://www.callsdiscount.com/

They offer international calls to USA, Canada, Germany, Italy and Ireland for virtually no charge !!!   Smiley

The access number is 0161 311 3111.   Within your inclusive minutes.   I can heartily recommend them, but be aware that this code only applies to certain countries, as 0843 and similar numbers are used for calling some countries.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 11th, 2013 at 8:07am by loddon »  
Campaignagainstripofftelecoms  
IP Logged
 
CJT-80
Global Moderator
*****
Offline



Posts: 1,714
Manchester
Gender: male
Re: BT No Longer Required To Give Indirect Access
Reply #10 - Oct 11th, 2013 at 3:50pm
 
thanks loddon,

I'll be checking them out!

Smiley Smiley
Back to top
 

Regards,

CJT-80

Any comments made are my own and are not those of SayNoTo0870.com
 
IP Logged
 
bigjohn
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 2,316
Gender: male
Re: BT No Longer Required To Give Indirect Access
Reply #11 - Oct 11th, 2013 at 7:12pm
 
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 11th, 2013 at 7:22pm by bigjohn »  

BJ.
 
IP Logged
 
Dave
Global Moderator
*****
Offline



Posts: 9,902
Yorkshire
Gender: male
Re: BT No Longer Required To Give Indirect Access
Reply #12 - Oct 11th, 2013 at 8:00pm
 
loddon wrote on Oct 11th, 2013 at 6:51am:
Heinz, don't do that -- have a look at Callsdiscount.com :---
http://www.callsdiscount.com/

They offer international calls to USA, Canada, Germany, Italy and Ireland for virtually no charge !!!   Smiley

International rates are the main area where these alternative call providers are useful. The cost of packages which include domestic "geographic rate" calls has fallen greatly over the years, but the cost of ringing international destinations from the main landline providers is still high.

There are quite a few mobile providers offering low rates to international destinations, which gives the low-cost operators available via a landline (or mobile) a run for their money.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
bigjohn
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 2,316
Gender: male
Re: BT No Longer Required To Give Indirect Access
Reply #13 - Nov 6th, 2013 at 9:14pm
 
Its been suggested that BT will block indirect access at the end of 2013.
Back to top
 

BJ.
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
(Moderators: bbb_uk, Dave, CJT-80, Forum Admin, DaveM)

Website and Content © 1999-2024 SAYNOTO0870.COM. All Rights Reserved. (DE)
Written permission is required to duplicate any of the content within this site.

WARNING: This is an open forum, posts are NOT endorsed by SAYNOTO0870.COM,
please exercise due caution when acting on any info from here.


SAYNOTO0870.COM » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved.


Valid RSS Valid XHTML Valid CSS Powered by Perl Source Forge