SAYNOTO0870.COM
https://www.saynoto0870.com/cgi-bin/forum/YaBB.cgi
Main Forum >> Call Providers >> BT's Low-User Scheme Blocks 18899,1899 Etc.
https://www.saynoto0870.com/cgi-bin/forum/YaBB.cgi?num=1140099429

Message started by Trevor on Feb 16th, 2006 at 2:17pm

Title: BT's Low-User Scheme Blocks 18899,1899 Etc.
Post by Trevor on Feb 16th, 2006 at 2:17pm
But I can still access 0844s for 1p calls to UK residentials, Switzerland, Thailand etc.   BT's charge to Thailand is still a ridiculous 66p per minute!

Shows that the big names are really hurting from upstart rivals.

- Edited by bbb_uk - Title corrected -

Title: Correction : www.18866.com & www.1899.com  
Post by Trevor on Feb 16th, 2006 at 2:28pm
0844-prefix at 1 ppm still allowed, probably due to revenue-sharing, whereas 18866 pays BT nothing?

Title: Re: BT's Low-User Scheme Blocks 18899,1899 Etc.
Post by saynonto0871 on Feb 16th, 2006 at 5:58pm
It was always the case that use of alternative carriers breached LUS terms.
A few years ago you could sign up for LUS while using pre-fix numbers. But it was usually a matter of months before they put you back onto Standard (RIP).

Title: Re: BT's Low-User Scheme Blocks 18899,1899 Etc.
Post by Wally on Feb 25th, 2006 at 12:02am
I've used alternative carriers for years and I found the same situation. I registered for the light user scheme and then  used the good old alternatives. They soon cottoned on and wouldn't let me on the light user scheme. Another way, although I didn't try it, may be to use the 0800 numbers that the phone companies give as an alternative. ;)

Title: Re: BT's Low-User Scheme Blocks 18899,1899 Etc.
Post by Martin_S on Mar 25th, 2006 at 8:45pm
But how can they cotton on if you are dialling 0800 or 0808 access numbers. Thats an invasion of privacy to the freephone numbers you dial??

Title: Re: BT's Low-User Scheme Blocks 18899,1899 Etc.
Post by trevord on Mar 25th, 2006 at 10:52pm
But Wally said he DIDN'T use the freephone prefix numbers - so he doesn't know whether they would know!  He presumably just used the normal carrier select code, like 1899, and then BT would realise.

Also it could be that BT might decide that you're not a "light-user" if you make lots of freephone calls - they presumably know if you're making freephone calls even if (in theory) they don't know which numbers you are calling.  :-/

Title: Re: BT's Low-User Scheme Blocks 18899,1899 Etc.
Post by bbb_uk on Mar 26th, 2006 at 8:15am

Martin_S wrote on Mar 25th, 2006 at 8:45pm:
But how can they cotton on if you are dialling 0800 or 0808 access numbers. Thats an invasion of privacy to the freephone numbers you dial??
It wouldn't technically be an invasion of privacy unless they listened in on the call.

If BT do block freephone access numbers as used by Call1899, etc then they've simply looked at Call1899's website for their access number and then programmed their system to block access to this number, or as said in the earlier post, excessive use of this number as well because I would have thought that BT would monitor calls on this tariff anyhow and having nothing but freephone numbers being dialled would be suspicious that you are possibly using freephone access numbers.

This is true because we are all aware (BT included) that very few companies actually use freephone numbers now for contact purposes (its mostly 0847/0845) so a lot of calls to a single freephone number would be considered suspicious by them and possibly automatically flagged on their system.

Title: Re: BT's Low-User Scheme Blocks 18899,1899 Etc.
Post by peterlittleton on Sep 20th, 2006 at 11:30am
I have a friend who has been on the Light user scheme for over 5 years and has used companies with 0800 or 0808 prefixes to make her calls. She initially used the onetel 0800 acess number that is used for cable customers but due to their connection fee she switched to using the 1899's 0808 access number. This was great, especially when their 0808 number was still giving call at 0.0p per minute. Now they are 1p per minute, however her 1899 bill still only works out at about £4 a month therefore each quarter she spend £12 on calls and about £13 to BT for their light user tariff. Total £25 a quarter. That is far better than paying BT £33 a quarter line rental.

This is ideal for BT customers who only want a phone service and is not available if you want ADSL Broadband.

Title: Re: BT's Low-User Scheme Blocks 18899,1899 Etc.
Post by Martin_S on Sep 23rd, 2006 at 3:08pm
I have a friend who is on LUS and has broadband and also uses a lot of 0800 numbers with no problems. BT now block you from getting broadband if you are on LUS but he had his line ADSL enabled before this happened. You would think they would cotton on.

Title: Re: BT's Low-User Scheme Blocks 18899,1899 Etc.
Post by a very nice man on Sep 23rd, 2006 at 8:23pm
Just googled "BT low user scheme" to see if the scheme was of use to me.
One level down was http://www.bt.com/customerservices/cust_details.jsp?BV_SessionID=@@@@1436337005.1159038775@@@@&BV_EngineID=ccciaddilmdhjifcflgcefkdffndfkk.0&parentcat=cs_in_contact&childcat=no_hidden_extras

Quote

Calls

With an In Contact Plus line, you can make the following calls free of charge:
Calls to the emergency services on 999 or 112
Calls to BT on 150 (for Customer Services)and on 151 (to report a fault on your line)
Calls to freephone numbers e.g. 0500, 0800 and 0808

End Quote

So that means you should be able to use 1899 etc 0808 access numbers for a cost of
...............Quarterly rental

BT will send you a bill every 3 months for £10.75 which covers the rental of your In Contact Plus line. If you would like, we can make it even easier for you, by allowing you to pay your bill in advance. Simply ask for a BT Payment Card.

End

£33 normal quarterly rental
£10.75 LUS rental
£22.25 saving

2225 mins or 37 hours and 5 mins using 1899 etc (NOT allowing for connection fees, depends on your call volume) before you reach the same price.
If you used 1899 to a max of 1 hour per call it would cost you 63p per hour, mins + connection.
£22.25 / £0.63p =  max of 35.32 hours. Or 35 hours and 19 mins per quarter.

OR

You could use the Voipstunt (for example) callback service at a cost of €0.05, about 3p per call.
£22.25 would buy you 741 calls to UK and several foreign landlines. Each call permitted up to 1 hour before disconnection.
741 calls / 13weeks = 57 hours per week (using maximum call time)
As this slightly exceeds the 5 hours in a 7 day period allowed by Voipstunt, this wouldn't happen.
So if we assume you're going to get as much as possible for the same money.

5 hours included.    5 * 3p = 15p
extra time is charged at 0.93p per min. Therefore an hour is (60 * 0.93p) + 3p = 58.8p
£22.25 - 15p = £22.10
£22.10 / £0.588p = 37.59 hours
Or 37 hours and 35 mins.

So... If you do less than 741 hours a QUARTER on calls you could be better off using their Low User Scheme

For those who weren't aware, and I've only just read it, of you use over 5000 mins monthly, you can buy UK landlines at 0.6p per min. Doesn't if this is plus or inc vat. If plus, then it's a total of 0.71p
http://www.voicetrading.com/en/rates.html

Title: Re: BT's Low-User Scheme Blocks 18899,1899 Etc.
Post by crashuk on Sep 25th, 2006 at 11:14am
so how come we cant use it for dsl.

Title: Re: BT's Low-User Scheme Blocks 18899,1899 Etc.
Post by bbb_uk on Sep 25th, 2006 at 11:39am

crashuk wrote on Sep 25th, 2006 at 11:14am:
so how come we cant use it for dsl.
Both Light User Scheme (LUS) and In Contact Plus were really designed for those on really low incomes or older people who need a phone for mostly emergencies so very rarely use the phone.

The t&c for both these services specifically state that calls via indirect operators and those with ADSL cannot use these two tariffs.  In fact, if you have a mobile then you are not elligible neither.

The main reason is that they are designed for emergency contact only (ie those that don't make many outgoing calls at all) and don't really use or have a mobile phone.

These two tariffs are in fact loss-makers for BT and BT have on many occasions tried to get rid of them but Ofcom have said they couldn't.  No other teleco provider could/would do a similar tariff as its not in their own interest.

Although one or two people have reported being successful in getting ADSL or using indirect (cheaper) call providers it is possible that if BT ever found out then they could move that person over to their normal £11 BT Together Option 1.

When BT said they would block people using the indirect cheaper call providers and/or those with broadband, many people complained to Ofcom and BT and Ofcom agreed with BT and decided that because these two tariffs only exist for those that need a phone for emergency contact and/or very, very rarely use then BT were right to block the use of such indirect cheaper call providers and/or broadband use.

For those that have got away with getting ADSL, I can only assume what has happened is that someone at BT hasn't realised when they activated ADSL on the line that they were in fact on LUS and therefore aren't entitled to use broadband or indirect providers.

Now with the likes of Call1899, etc via their freephone number, it may be possible to use Call1899 with LUS and/or InContact Plus simply because BT haven't caught on that these companies use such 0808 numbers.

I suspect that BT have systems in place that monitor abnormal usage of numbers like they do when they start charging for dial-up internet calls to geographical numbers despite being on an inclusive geographical call package.  Therefore, excessive/continued use of Call1899's freephone number may alert BT to investigate this for which BT will then realise that people are using freephone numbers to make cheaper calls and will subsequently block access to these specific freephone numbers.

Title: Re: BT's Low-User Scheme Blocks 18899,1899 Etc.
Post by a very nice man on Sep 25th, 2006 at 6:24pm
However that still leaves it open to being used with Voipstunt callback, as that would be an incoming call.

Title: BT Light User Scheme and Onetel Block
Post by Martin_S on Dec 19th, 2006 at 9:33pm
Hi. My grandmother is on the LUS. I bought her an Orchid dialler and programmed the routing table. Shes used this no problem for 6 months. Today she gets a message, "Please cease your membership of the light user scheme". I intially thought BT have barred the 1899 etc numbers but when I got her to dial manually they still work. Edit: It seems to be only the 0800 9571877 onetel number that is being barred. Will this affect all diallers? Has anyone else got problems with this?

I know I might get a few replies back saying this is unethical but so is BT's expensive line rental for OAP's. Besides she is 86 and doesn't use the phone that much anyway. But when she did her calls on the LUS scheme were very expensive!

Would appreciate any replies.

Title: Re: BT Light User Scheme and Onetel Block
Post by bbb_uk on Dec 19th, 2006 at 10:36pm

Martin_S wrote on Dec 19th, 2006 at 9:33pm:
I know I might get a few replies back saying this is unethical but so is BT's expensive line rental for OAP's. Besides she is 86 and doesn't use the phone that much anyway. But when she did her calls on the LUS scheme were very expensive!
Whilst I agree BT's linerental is expensive especially for OAP's, etc but this is why the linerental is effectively upto about 50% cheaper on LUS than normal linerental.  As a result, for those making a lot of calls then the linerental they pay BT is increased accordingly (ie the reduction is reduced the more calls they make resulting in higher linerental).  This is relatively fair if you ask me as you get the best of both worlds.  That is, if you don't make much outgoing calls then you don't get such a high linerental charge but if you get carried away with calls your linerental is effectively increased to the point where you get the linerental for the same price as normal customers (if phone usage is high).

BT make no secret that they will block access to short codes so if your grandmother has made a lot of calls then why shouldn't she pay for them?

You have to remember that BT actually make a loss on the LUS and In-Contact Plus as it costs more to maintain the lines than they are charging for those on LUS and In-Contact Plus.  I have no idea why they make a loss but an OfcoN investigation did state (if I remember correctly) that it costs BT about £9 per month to maintain a line, etc.  In fact, BT have tried many, many times to actually get rid of these two tariffs but Ofcom have said no.

You have to look at it from BT's side of things as well.  Cable companies don't have to (and actually don't) have such tariffs simply because they lose money so this is why BT have tried to get rid of these tariffs but so far failed due to Ofcom overriding them.

Your grandmother is lucky she got away with it this long.  As for what can be done - well she can try not to make as many calls as she did or she accepts she has to pay for them, or if her usage is high enough so it ends up she is paying normal price for linerental then she would be better of moving to normal linerental and getting Primus' free evening & weekend package for no monthly fee and using Call18185 in the daytime (see here).

There is nothing else really that can be done.

Title: Re: BT Light User Scheme and Onetel Block
Post by peterlittleton on Dec 21st, 2006 at 5:00pm

Martin_S wrote on Dec 19th, 2006 at 9:33pm:
Hi. My grandmother is on the LUS. I bought her an Orchid dialler and programmed the routing table. Shes used this no problem for 6 months. Today she gets a message, "Please cease your membership of the light user scheme". I intially thought BT have barred the 1899 etc numbers but when I got her to dial manually they still work. Edit: It seems to be only the 0800 9571877 onetel number that is being barred. Will this affect all diallers? Has anyone else got problems with this?

I know I might get a few replies back saying this is unethical but so is BT's expensive line rental for OAP's. Besides she is 86 and doesn't use the phone that much anyway. But when she did her calls on the LUS scheme were very expensive!

Would appreciate any replies.


Someone at BT may have finally noticed that nearly most of your calls are to the same 0800 number.
My mum uses the the 0808 number provided by 1899 and has done for years and is still able to remain on the LUS. She has the 0808 number programmed into one of the One-Touch Memory buttons on her phone so it is very easy to use.



Title: Re: BT Light User Scheme and Onetel Block
Post by bbb_uk on Dec 21st, 2006 at 6:07pm

4PetesSake wrote on Dec 21st, 2006 at 5:00pm:

Martin_S wrote on Dec 19th, 2006 at 9:33pm:
Hi. My grandmother is on the LUS. I bought her an Orchid dialler and programmed the routing table. Shes used this no problem for 6 months. Today she gets a message, "Please cease your membership of the light user scheme". I intially thought BT have barred the 1899 etc numbers but when I got her to dial manually they still work. Edit: It seems to be only the 0800 9571877 onetel number that is being barred. Will this affect all diallers? Has anyone else got problems with this?

I know I might get a few replies back saying this is unethical but so is BT's expensive line rental for OAP's. Besides she is 86 and doesn't use the phone that much anyway. But when she did her calls on the LUS scheme were very expensive!

Would appreciate any replies.


Someone at BT may have finally noticed that nearly most of your calls are to the same 0800 number.
My mum uses the the 0808 number provided by 1899 and has done for years and is still able to remain on the LUS. She has the 0808 number programmed into one of the One-Touch Memory buttons on her phone so it is very easy to use.
If the usage is low then anyone using this is more likely to get away with it.  If the usage is high, etc then obviously it increases the chances that they'll get caught because BT are more likely to notice a lot of freephone numbers on the bill.

Title: Re: BT's Low-User Scheme Blocks 18899,1899 Etc.
Post by a very nice man on Dec 22nd, 2006 at 11:09pm
As I've already mentioned in replies 9 & 12, you could initiate a callback from one of the voip companies.
The connection fee would be about 3p for up to 1 hour of calling (to UK, others need to be verified)
This would be treated as an inbound call by BT.

Title: Re: BT's Low-User Scheme Blocks 18866,1899 Etc.
Post by darkstar on Dec 23rd, 2006 at 9:41pm
I love the irony....a website based on stopping people being 'scammed' by companies has people advising on how to scam the companies.  ;D

Title: Re: BT's Low-User Scheme Blocks 18866,1899 Etc.
Post by peterlittleton on Dec 24th, 2006 at 5:01pm

darkstar wrote on Dec 23rd, 2006 at 9:41pm:
I love the irony....a website based on stopping people being 'scammed' by companies has people advising on how to scam the companies.  ;D


This is nothing compared with what is available over on the MSE site.

Checkout these 2 threads about Tesco.

http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.html?p=3770766#post3770766
http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.html?p=3770753&posted=1#post3770753

Title: Re: BT's Low-User Scheme Blocks 18866,1899 Etc.
Post by Delta on Dec 28th, 2006 at 11:49pm
I've used Onetel 0800 957 1877 for at least 5 years. Today found it blocked.
To be honest surprised it has taken BT this long to log and block it.
Anyone know an alternative Onetel number?

Before using Onetel I had a pay-up-front account with Alpha Telecom.
They would issue new freephone numbers.
They did increase connection charge but looking at website looks like current UK rate is 3p/min and no connection charge.
Is anyone using them now?

Title: Re: BT's Low-User Scheme Blocks 18866,1899 Etc.
Post by peterlittleton on Dec 29th, 2006 at 6:12pm

Delta wrote on Dec 28th, 2006 at 11:49pm:
I've used Onetel 0800 957 1877 for at least 5 years. Today found it blocked.
To be honest surprised it has taken BT this long to log and block it.
Anyone know an alternative Onetel number?

Before using Onetel I had a pay-up-front account with Alpha Telecom.
They would issue new freephone numbers.
They did increase connection charge but looking at website looks like current UK rate is 3p/min and no connection charge.
Is anyone using them now?


Your best bet is to sign up with 1899 or 18185 where you will pay a 4p connection charge and 1p a minute.
If you are on the LUS you will have to use their freephone 0808 prefixes.

Title: BT's Low-User Scheme Blocks 18899,1899 Etc.
Post by bbb_uk on Dec 31st, 2006 at 2:17pm
It has been mentioned to me that BT are going to remove the Light User Scheme (LUS) and In-Contact Plus (ICR).  They will be replaced by BT Basic.

More details here.

Title: Re: BT's Low-User Scheme Blocks 18866,1899 Etc.
Post by Delta on Jan 2nd, 2007 at 10:57pm

4PetesSake wrote on Dec 29th, 2006 at 6:12pm:

Delta wrote on Dec 28th, 2006 at 11:49pm:
I've used Onetel 0800 957 1877 for at least 5 years. Today found it blocked.
To be honest surprised it has taken BT this long to log and block it.
Anyone know an alternative Onetel number?

Before using Onetel I had a pay-up-front account with Alpha Telecom.
They would issue new freephone numbers.
They did increase connection charge but looking at website looks like current UK rate is 3p/min and no connection charge.
Is anyone using them now?


Your best bet is to sign up with 1899 or 18185 where you will pay a 4p connection charge and 1p a minute.
If you are on the LUS you will have to use their freephone 0808 prefixes.



Surely 1899's and 18185's 0808 ****** numbers will be on BT's blocked list for LUS scheme subscribers same as Onetel's number now is.

Also have heard nothing about ending of LUS from BT.
No mention on their website page either
http://www.bt.com/Pricing/pis_info.jsp?PRICE_OPTION=Residential/PIS_Other_Call_Schemes/PIS_Light_User_Scheme&showsub=PIS_Residential&showsub2=PIS_Other_Call_Schemes&showsub3=PIS_Light_User_Scheme&showsub=PIS_Residential&showsub2=PIS_Other_Call_Schemes&showsub3=PIS_Light_User_Scheme&obsType=LINK&obsOID=30185&vStore=1314&obsPage=/Pricing/pis_infojsp&obsNoSee=Y

I would not qualify for BT Basic so if this is true will be forced to pay £12 / month as I pay cash rather than DD. Currently only pay about £15 quarter and usually have not paid more than £5 quarter to Onetel as peak calls 2.5p/ min rather than 8p/min.

I would Join Talk Talk broadband & phone including line rental for £20.99 / month but know someone who initially signed up in October but has still to be connected. They have a date now 16th January, but they were first given a date in November followed by 3 in December.
I dread to think what support will be like if they have a problem when they eventually get connected.

Title: Re: BT's Low-User Scheme Blocks 18866,1899 Etc.
Post by peterlittleton on Jan 3rd, 2007 at 5:18pm

Delta wrote on Jan 2nd, 2007 at 10:57pm:
Surely 1899's and 18185's 0808 ****** numbers will be on BT's blocked list for LUS scheme subscribers same as Onetel's number now is.

Also have heard nothing about ending of LUS from BT.
No mention on their website page either
http://www.bt.com/Pricing/pis_info.jsp?PRICE_OPTION=Residential/PIS_Other_Call_Schemes/PIS_Light_User_Scheme&showsub=PIS_Residential&showsub2=PIS_Other_Call_Schemes&showsub3=PIS_Light_User_Scheme&showsub=PIS_Residential&showsub2=PIS_Other_Call_Schemes&showsub3=PIS_Light_User_Scheme&obsType=LINK&obsOID=30185&vStore=1314&obsPage=/Pricing/pis_infojsp&obsNoSee=Y

I would not qualify for BT Basic so if this is true will be forced to pay £12 / month as I pay cash rather than DD. Currently only pay about £15 quarter and usually have not paid more than £5 quarter to Onetel as peak calls 2.5p/ min rather than 8p/min.

I would Join Talk Talk broadband & phone including line rental for £20.99 / month but know someone who initially signed up in October but has still to be connected. They have a date now 16th January, but they were first given a date in November followed by 3 in December.
I dread to think what support will be like if they have a problem when they eventually get connected.


I can assure you that BT have not yet blocked the 0808 numbers that allow you to use 1899 and 18185. If they do I will find out soon enough and will post it on here.

I too had not heard about BT doing away with LUS and replacing it with BT Basic but I would trust bbb_uk if he says that is what BT are going to do.

I have also heard so many scare stories about talktalk that I think they are worth avoiding.

One other option that still allows you to use a normal phone is to take NTL Broadband and make all your calls via your computer using a voip provider such as voip.co.uk  This way you will not have to pay any line rental to anyone. :) :) :)

Title: Re: BT's Low-User Scheme Blocks 18866,1899 Etc.
Post by Delta on Jan 3rd, 2007 at 6:40pm

4PetesSake wrote on Jan 3rd, 2007 at 5:18pm:

Delta wrote on Jan 2nd, 2007 at 10:57pm:
Surely 1899's and 18185's 0808 ****** numbers will be on BT's blocked list for LUS scheme subscribers same as Onetel's number now is.

Also have heard nothing about ending of LUS from BT.
No mention on their website page either
http://www.bt.com/Pricing/pis_info.jsp?PRICE_OPTION=Residential/PIS_Other_Call_Schemes/PIS_Light_User_Scheme&showsub=PIS_Residential&showsub2=PIS_Other_Call_Schemes&showsub3=PIS_Light_User_Scheme&showsub=PIS_Residential&showsub2=PIS_Other_Call_Schemes&showsub3=PIS_Light_User_Scheme&obsType=LINK&obsOID=30185&vStore=1314&obsPage=/Pricing/pis_infojsp&obsNoSee=Y

I would not qualify for BT Basic so if this is true will be forced to pay £12 / month as I pay cash rather than DD. Currently only pay about £15 quarter and usually have not paid more than £5 quarter to Onetel as peak calls 2.5p/ min rather than 8p/min.

I would Join Talk Talk broadband & phone including line rental for £20.99 / month but know someone who initially signed up in October but has still to be connected. They have a date now 16th January, but they were first given a date in November followed by 3 in December.
I dread to think what support will be like if they have a problem when they eventually get connected.


I can assure you that BT have not yet blocked the 0808 numbers that allow you to use 1899 and 18185. If they do I will find out soon enough and will post it on here.

I too had not heard about BT doing away with LUS and replacing it with BT Basic but I would trust bbb_uk if he says that is what BT are going to do.

I have also heard so many scare stories about talktalk that I think they are worth avoiding.

One other option that still allows you to use a normal phone is to take NTL Broadband and make all your calls via your computer using a voip provider such as voip.co.uk  This way you will not have to pay any line rental to anyone. :) :) :)



Thanks for confirmation that 0808 numbers used by 1899 and 18185 are not being blocked for now.
About to go and look at their websites.

Also for info about NTL and VOIP. However don't really want to be dependant on PC for phone calls, and what about incoming calls?

Just read about new Tiscali broadband, phone & line rental package here
http://www.saynoto0870.com/cgi-bin/forum/YaBB.cgi?num=1164034300
but note same as I have heard support is poor.

Maybe a reliable broadband provider will come up with a similar scheme soon or even BT to stop customers moving.

Title: Re: BT's Low-User Scheme Blocks 18899,1899 Etc.
Post by LeeUK on Jan 3rd, 2007 at 9:15pm
Funny how you can't get ADSL if you're on the Light User Scheme.

So, when I wanted to get ADSL I had to move up to the Option 1 tariff. Strange how I was put back on Light User when my next bill came in and have been since, With ADSL.  :-)

Title: Re: BT's Low-User Scheme Blocks 18866,1899 Etc.
Post by peterlittleton on Jan 3rd, 2007 at 10:16pm

Delta wrote on Jan 3rd, 2007 at 6:40pm:
Thanks for confirmation that 0808 numbers used by 1899 and 18185 are not being blocked for now.
About to go and look at their websites.

Also for info about NTL and VOIP. However don't really want to be dependant on PC for phone calls, and what about incoming calls?

Just read about new Tiscali broadband, phone & line rental package here
http://www.saynoto0870.com/cgi-bin/forum/YaBB.cgi?num=1164034300
but note same as I have heard support is poor.

Maybe a reliable broadband provider will come up with a similar scheme soon or even BT to stop customers moving.


With companies such as Voip.co.uk or Vonage you connect your normal phone to your computer and you then use the phone is the same way as normal. There is no problem receiving calls. I believe that with vonage you can even choose your own phone number.

I have also heard some of the complaints about Tiscali, however my brother and father in law are with them and have always found the CS to be very efficient.

Title: Re: BT's Low-User Scheme Blocks 18899,1899 Etc.
Post by Delta on Jan 6th, 2007 at 12:04am
Joined 18185.
0808 number working with LUS for now.
Maybe because 0808 ******* mainly dial-up internet which, unlike brandband, is allowed with LUS.

Also 1899 and 18185 have same contact address hence presumably same company.  

Title: Re: BT's Low-User Scheme Blocks 18899,1899 Etc.
Post by peterlittleton on Jan 6th, 2007 at 5:10am

Delta wrote on Jan 6th, 2007 at 12:04am:
Joined 18185.
0808 number working with LUS for now.
Maybe because 0808 ******* mainly dial-up internet which, unlike brandband, is allowed with LUS.

Also 1899 and 18185 have same contact address hence presumably same company.  


I have often wondered about that as their pricing for calls is quite different with 18185 now being better value to nearly all destinations. Perhaps someone with more knowledge about the companies will be able to answer this question?

Title: Re: BT's Low-User Scheme Blocks 18899,1899 Etc.
Post by bbb_uk on Jan 6th, 2007 at 10:24am

4PetesSake wrote on Jan 6th, 2007 at 5:10am:

Delta wrote on Jan 6th, 2007 at 12:04am:
Joined 18185.
0808 number working with LUS for now.
Maybe because 0808 ******* mainly dial-up internet which, unlike brandband, is allowed with LUS.

Also 1899 and 18185 have same contact address hence presumably same company.  


I have often wondered about that as their pricing for calls is quite different with 18185 now being better value to nearly all destinations. Perhaps someone with more knowledge about the companies will be able to answer this question?
Call18185, Call1899, Call18866 are all part of the same group and owned by a company called Finera SA based in Switzerland (I think).

Title: Re: BT's Low-User Scheme Blocks 18899,1899 Etc.
Post by peterlittleton on Jan 6th, 2007 at 1:36pm
Thanks bbb_uk. Do you have any idea why they are running 3 similar companies each with different prices.
I am registered for all 3 of them and just use whichever is best for a particular call.

Title: Re: BT's Low-User Scheme Blocks 18899,1899 Etc.
Post by Tanllan on Jan 6th, 2007 at 2:18pm
I presume because most people will see a saving and then continue to use that number for everything else. Not all people are prepared to carry out the research that many here pursue.

Title: Re: BT's Low-User Scheme Blocks 18899,1899 Etc.
Post by Delta on Feb 19th, 2007 at 10:16pm
Just found published 0808 *** **** for 18185 now blocked by BT for Light User Scheme.

Are any alternatives known for 18185 or 1899 or any other provider - if so perhaps best not posted on here!

SAYNOTO0870.COM » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved.