From The Times    22 March 2006

A pie chart shows that BT has a Market Share of 56.25%  (Based on calls.  Source USwitch )

Quote .............

Liberation of BT could start phone price war

By Elizabeth Judge

A FIERCE price war in the landline calls market could be triggered by a proposal from the regulator to eliminate price controls that are imposed on BT.

Plans by Ofcom to let BT compete for customers on an equal level with rivals from August could allow the telecoms giant to cut prices in a move to win back customers who have switched away from it.


Under the proposals, BT could seek either to undercut rivals or push up its line rental and call costs. It would also be allowed to offer a bundled package of services like those offered by rivals such as NTL and Wanadoo Although BT said yesterday only that it would “respond formally . . . in due course” to Ofcom’s proposals, Ian Livingston, head of BT’s retail division, has said already that he plans to offer more “tailored packages” to consumers if the group is released from retail price controls.

Blair Wadman, telecoms analyst at USwitch, the price comparison service, said: “If BT slashes prices, this would certainly see the five major home telephony companies in the UK engage in a price war in an attempt to gain market share.”
Oftel, then the regulator, first imposed controls on BT that restricted its ability to move call and line rental prices either up or down at its privatisation 22 years ago in a move to bring down prices for consumers.

Since then, new entrants have flooded the domestic calls market. New technologies, such as voice-over-internet, and services such as wholesale line rental have also put the heat on BT, prompting the regulator to consider allowing the existing retail price controls to lapse.

............. End Quote

Sadly a war against citizen consumers :(

Under the proposals, BT could seek either to undercut rivals or push up its line rental and call costs. It would also be allowed to offer a bundled package of services like those offered by rivals such as NTL and Wanadoo

And what has it done already.  It is putting up it's line rental and forcing customers to take a package that many don't need such as Option 1.  Standard line rental was ideal for those with competitors, and the light user scheme is not available with prefix or CPS services.

In the next move BT will start adding more features many people don't need, and bundled packages might mean that their minimum option will be £20 line rental and Option 3 services.  For those not making that many calls then that will be the minimum cost of having a line to your house, as Option 1 is at the moment.  This will also put a strain on other providers who will also have to charge this much for WLR services and include anytime 01/02, and there would be no benefit of having a CPS service as you can't compete with so called "free" 01/02 calls.

Think the Times made a typo in their headline - should read:

Liberation of BT could start phoneY price war  ;) ;) ;)

gdh82 wrote on Mar 28^th, 2006 at 5:01pm:

Think the Times made a typo in their headline - should read: Liberation of BT could start phoneY price war  ;) ;) ;)

::) ::) ::)

And the Overpaid Holiday Takers at OfCoN say that BT don't need to be forced to make NakedDSL available on countryside exchanges where they are the only ADSL provider at the wholesale level.

So although a NakedDSL line at £10 a quarter to BT to maintain the copper wire and exchange equipment would do me (on top of which I then pay my ADSL broadband provider) the useless Ofcom will maintain that market forces that don't exist are somehow going to make NakedDSL appear here from BT without a statutory requirement. :-? ::)

If there are any B Arks left on the market (with apologies to those who have not watched or read Douglas Adams's Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy series) I would make sure to pack the whole crew at Ofcom off on one along with all the world's telephone sanitisers.  And to be fair the latter are probably doing a significantly more useful and worthwhile job than OfCoN are.