Quote:

The Times December 29, 2006


Ofcom puts out nearly 1,000 policy documents in a year
Dan Sabbagh, Media Editor

Sheer volume of consultations rises
Watchdog still held in respect




Ofcom, the communications regulator, produced nearly 1,000 policy documents this year, amounting to almost four every working day of 2006, The Times has learnt.
The deluge of information ranged from the regulator’s 294-page annual review of the entire communications market to the one-page statement setting out the inquiry into BSkyB’s 17.9 per cent shareholding in ITV. It includes 207 policy consultations — nearly two a week — of which the largest typically were supported by a further four working papers and technical documents to ensure that every interested party had a chance to participate in its decision- making.



In addition, Ofcom issued 297 shorter regulatory bulletins and regulatory statements, the last of which marked Ofcom’s actual decisions, plus a further 76 standalone research papers. They take the total to about 980, even before a further 145 news releases are taken into consideration.

The figure, released by Ofcom itself, emerged on the day that the regulator celebrated its third birthday. A “super-regulator”, created from five organisations, it covers the £50 billion broadcast and telecommunications industries.

One of Ofcom’s mantras is to behave as a “light-touch regulator”, but seasoned corporate affairs executives say that the sheer volume of consultations is far greater than was the case in the era of the Independent Television Commission, or Oftel.

Few companies regulated by Ofcom want to comment publicly on the subject, arguing that it is not helpful to criticise the organisation. Despite the quantity of material, it remains largely respected in the industries in which it operates.

A source at one of the largest companies regulated by Ofcom said simply: “Ofcom’s light touch makes for hard reading.” Elsewhere, another head of corporate affairs was spending the period between Christmas and the new year in the office to ensure that they kept up with consultation requirements.

A spokesman for O2, the mobile phone group owned by Telefónica, of Spain, said that although Ofcom “was an improvement on Oftel”, there “remains too much regulatory activity and too much bureaucracy, even though all agree that there is a need for a regulator”.

Pride of place among Ofcom’s publications is Communications: The Next Decade, a 324-page hardback tome. It is notionally priced at £25, but was given away at a conference, organised by Ofcom for regulators across Europe, held in London last month. Ofcom defends its policy of detailed consultation, arguing that it needs to adopt an “evidence-based approach”. In the past Lord Currie, its chairman, has spoken of the dangers of “regulation on the cheap”, where a poorly resourced organisation simply gets it wrong.

Paper chase

145 news releases

92 major policy consultations

115 smaller technical notifications/consultations

76 stand-alone research documents

217 regulatory bulletins, licensing documents and codes

80 regulatory statements

No, but the telcos love 'em.

The guys who work for the telcos dont......

In reality probably nobody loves Ofcom except its employees and their over super annuated pension schemes. >:( [smiley=thumbdown.gif]

It has, however, launched an "inquiry" into the broadcast of recent events, on the basis of thirty complaints.

Tens of thousands of complaints about government and other use of premium numbers and it does bugger all.

Makes you proud to be British doesn't it?!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6230105.stm

<<
UK media watchdog Ofcom has launched an probe into coverage of the execution.

It said it had received 30 complaints from viewers.
>>

idb wrote on Jan 4^th, 2007 at 3:40pm:

It has, however, launched an "inquiry" into the broadcast of recent events, on the basis of thirty complaints. Tens of thousands of complaints about government and other use of premium numbers and it does bugger all. Makes you proud to be British doesn't it?! http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6230105.stm << UK media watchdog Ofcom has launched an probe into coverage of the execution. It said it had received 30 complaints from viewers. >>

And it recently fined an encrypted dedicated late night Sky porn channel £30,000 for showing real hard core porn that all its viewers would undoubtedly have hoped they might see (but that prurient Harriet Harman, Tessa Jowell and Hazel Blear would have no doubt been shocked by as being terrible exploitation of women) on the basis of one complaint from a viewer who almost certainly worked for either a rival porn tv channel or the Association of UK Licensed Sex Shops (if such a thing exists).  It seems Ofcom only takes urgent action on those matters that its New Labour masters have told it that it wants action on. ;) :o >:( [smiley=thumbdown.gif]