Hello! I've joined the forum just now in order to post a request.

Does anyone have a geo for Penrhyn Bay Medical Centre? (http://www.penrhynbay-deganwymedicalcentre.co.uk/) They changed to a pesky 0844 a couple of years ago, a move which coincided with a change of policy for making appointments. Until then, there was no guarantee that you would get an appointment on the same day. So many people complained that they had to wait days to see a doctor, that they changed the system to one where you have to phone (or visit) between 8.30 and 10.00am (a nightmare for people who start work at 9.00am and are on their way there before that - i.e. the majority!), and you're certain to get an appointment sometime that day. (Again, a nightmare for workers, as it means they can't book time off with their boss until the last minute, but I digress...) That was when the number changed to a non-geo one.

Dialling the old number (01492 549368) only gives you the posh BT lady telling you to dial the new one (0844 477 3342). At the moment I use a pre-paid over-ride service (ASDA Calltime) to 'bypass' BT when phoning the surgery. This costs 10p a minute (so a £10 top-up with my ASDA Calltime swipe card would give me 100 minutes calling that particular 0844 number). That's not too bad when I don't have to call the surgery often; otherwise, it would be cheaper to just go over my BT inclusive minutes by making the call with them. You can be on hold for up to ten minutes; that's a £1 call with ASDA's 1460 prefix.

There *must* be a better alternative? ;)

While I can just about understand the rationale behind switching to non-geographic numbers, *surely* there's no longer any excuse for organisations to use expensive ones like 0844? An 0800, 0808, 0500, 03, 0845 or 0870 number would be able to handle automation and queuing just as well, and wouldn't cost the caller a penny from a landline - the first three being free at all times, and the last three now included in most landline calling plans. How does the NHS in particular justify the continued use of non-inclusive, or 'premium', 08 numbers for automated queuing systems? We need to NAG them about the alternatives, until they back down!!!

---

~ Edited by Dave: Thread split off and title amended

E-mail address would appear to be firstname.lastname@gp-w94018.wales.nhs.uk

Many thanks, Dave. I've found the name of the Practice Manager: http://www.wales.nhs.uk/ourservices/directory/betsicadwaladruniversityhealthboard/gps/W94018

So next time I need to make an appointment, I'll try to do it by e-mailing (before 10am!) diane.windmill@gp-w94018.wales.nhs.uk

This job advertisement confirms that such an e-mail address exists: http://careers.bmj.com/careers/view-job.html?id=20038446

The practice website gives no e-mail address, so they probably won't like it. But tough! ;D She might just tell me to call, though (if she's a jobsworth), as the time on an e-mail is not always accurate. They might not even read it until much later that day... I'd rather annoy her than one of the doctors, though.

I will, of course, let you know of the response!

You might like to read the guidance I have posted previously on this. I have done some searches and come up with nothing giving anyone's direct number.

The job advert on the BMJ website gives the 0844 number. For other surgeries I've come across job adverts with members of staffs' direct numbers, and from there tracked down the main number that is answered with the menu.

All Penrhyn Bay numbers begin '54'. The most common ones are 546, 547, 548 and 549. In fact, I don't think I've ever seen any others. It's those elusive last three digits that I need to crack! I guess the only people who know the 'proper' number are the staff, who've probably been sworn to secrecy!

Thank you for trying. I suppose I'll have to pursue the matter through my councillors and MP - all of whom would, I'm sure, be on my side.

Trenod wrote on Jul 30^th, 2010 at 10:34pm:

All Penrhyn Bay numbers begin '54'. The most common ones are 546, 547, 548 and 549. In fact, I don't think I've ever seen any others. It's those elusive last three digits that I need to crack! I guess the only people who know the 'proper' number are the staff, who've probably been sworn to secrecy!

On the basis that the old number begins 54, then the surgery in question is on Rhôs-on-Sea exchange and this is the only prefix for that exchange. Thus, I believe that the new number will begin 54.