can someone help with this number please 0906 515 0901 law firm
thank you in advance

---

~ Edited by Dave: Thread title amended to name of company

Name of the Law Firm, and an address or website?

Would help a lot

dondon wrote on Jan 11^th, 2011 at 10:16pm:

can someone help with this number please 0906 515 0901 law firm thank you in advance

Please read the instructions before making a request

http://www.saynoto0870.com/cgi-bin/forum/YaBB.cgi?num=1107463510

As CJT-80 says some basic information would be helpful, after all we are not mind readers ::)

Search the Internet - is good advice.

http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=0906+515+0901 refers to this page plus http://maliklaw.com/brit_law.html on which the number +44(0)20 7613 5454 is given.

Some may argue that a law firm which charges £25 for a consultation by telephone on call back should not be charging £1.50 per minute for calls made by clients for advice. The cost information given is in fact incorrect, as the BT rate is now 153.179 pence per minute. I personally believe that the quoted rate should be VAT inclusive (regardless of the VAT rate in effect at the time) and be qualified by stating that the telephone company will add its own "Access Charge", which must be published separately by each telephone company. With such information provided to callers, I cannot see any objection to a law firm providing advice by telephone and giving the option for its charges to be paid through the caller's telephone bill.

SilentCallsVictim wrote on Jan 12^th, 2011 at 9:29am:

I cannot see any objection to a law firm providing advice by telephone and giving the option for its charges to be paid through the caller's telephone bill.

For once I agree with SCV, you would have no objection to paying a solicitor for advice if you went and saw him/her, so why should you get the advice free by telephone?

It seems very strange that dondon posted a request a few days ago and has not been back since making that request. I would suggest he is wasting our time ::)

Have you considered that his pressing legal matter may now perhaps have already been determined by a court or tribunal so that his urgent need to speak to this firm may now have passed.

NGMsGhost wrote on Jan 15^th, 2011 at 12:34am:

Have you considered that his pressing legal matter may now perhaps have already been determined by a court or tribunal so that his urgent need to speak to this firm may now have passed.

If that is the case, he/she could have the courtesy to come back and tell us

He might not be in a position to do so, having either fled the country or been locked up in clink.   :o

catj wrote on Jan 21^st, 2011 at 11:34pm:

He might not be in a position to do so, having either fled the country or been locked up in clink.   :o

A thought that had also occurred to me.  Although one must consider the main specialities  of this firm of solicitors (which oddly enough then calls itself a Law Chambers when this term is normally restricted only to to use by barristers)


Quote:

Malik Law Chambers is a leading law firm based in London, specialising in administrative law, with particular expertise in immigration, nationality, human rights and administrative law

So it is indeed possible that the OP may no longer be in the country but not because they have fled it but rather because they have been extradited from it. :o :'(