SAYNOTO0870.COM | |
https://www.saynoto0870.com/cgi-bin/forum/YaBB.cgi
Main Forum >> Government and Public Sector >> Dr. Glencross surgery refutes ban on 0844 numbers. https://www.saynoto0870.com/cgi-bin/forum/YaBB.cgi?num=1339707986 Message started by catj on Jun 14th, 2012 at 9:06pm |
Title: Dr. Glencross surgery refutes ban on 0844 numbers. Post by catj on Jun 14th, 2012 at 9:06pm
Re: http://www.glencrosssurgery.nhs.uk/info.aspx?p=9
Quote:
No, not illegal, but nevertheless banned. Quote:
Yes, there's a 4p "premium" added to the price of the call by the GPs telephony provider. This results in the call to an 0844 number costing more than calling a geographic 01/02 number or an 03 NGN number. This directly contravenes the instruction that calls to GPs must not cost more than calling an 01 or 02 or 03 number. Quote:
No providers have 0844 numbers within the inclusive minutes. Quote:
If you're seriously thinking that the callers service provider is going to charge the caller 4p per minute and then hand all of that money to the GPs service provider to pay the "premium" and take nothing themselves then you're living in fantasy land. The callers service provider will charge for the call then add the "premium" they have to hand over to the GPs provider on top of that. That's not the fault of the callers provider. That is the fault of the GPs provider. Quote:
This is debatable. Quote:
Rather than hit an engaged tone at no cost and redial later, the call is answered immediately and the user pays a "premium" to listen to musak for an indeterminite time before eventually speaking to someone. In the meatime, 4p per minute is being transferred to the GPs provider. Quote:
Whilst these are useful, it is not only 08 numbers that can do this. The same service is available on at least 03 numbers. Quote:
Scaremongering. With the same amount of staff and callers, everyone will still get through. However without the 0844 number, the GPs provider is no longer being provided with 4p per minute for every call made to every GP surgery. Quote:
You can't claim "popularity". For the surgery with only an 0844 number, 100% of callers used the 0844 number. Callers have NO CHOICE. Give the users a choice of numbers (0844 and 01/02/03) AND list the call prices for each and you'll see the number of calls to 0844 plummet to zero. Quote:
Of course they can "get through" easier. The call is answered and charging starts within seconds of dialling. Actually speaking to someone comes only after a number of minutes charged anything from 4 to 50 pence per minute. |
Title: Re: Dr. Glencross surgery refutes ban on 0844 numbers. Post by catj on Jun 14th, 2012 at 9:06pm Quote:
Since 084 numbers always cost more than 01/02/03 numbers any such assurance is FALSE. In particular, 0844 numbers fail that test and have effectively been banned since April 2010. Quote:
I would hope not. If so, they have been hoodwinked. Quote:
I'd like to see that proof, especially since there hasn't been such a thing as a "local call" for many years. Every landline provider and every mobile provider charges more to call an 0844 number than to call an 01/02/03 number. In addition for services where 01/02/03 numbers are 'inclusive' and therefore effectively 'free', no providers include 0844 numbers within that 'inclusive' or 'free' allowance. Quote:
Yes, they are not 'free'. They are 'inclusive'. But you're dodging the point that 0844 numbers are never included in this allowance. This is a factor that should be taken into account when determining if a number used to call a GP costs more than calling an 01/02/03 number. 0844 numbers fail this test. Quote:
Yet more dodging of the point. It is irrelevent as to whether a subscriber users all of their inclusive minutes or not. What is important is that when a subscriber has 'inclusive' calls to 01/02/03 numbers, calls to their GP should also be 'inclusive'. Since 0844 numbers are never inclusive in such plans, 0844 numbers fail this test. Using this criteria, 0844 numbers are therefore banned for use by GPs. Quote:
There is no such thing as 'local rate'. There is a 'geographic rate', but 0844 numbers are not geographic and they are not charged at geographic rate - mainly because of the 4p per minute premium that has to be paid to the GPs provider. Quote:
The overcharging occurs because the GP chose to use an 0844 premium rate number, not because of the callers choice of telephone provider. Quote:
Yes. If the GP had chosen an 01/02/03 number the rounding up of zero pence per minute up to the next minute would result in the caller paying .... nothing. By using an 0844 number callers are paying more. Whether call times are rounded or not is irrelevant, the pence per minute rate is already higher for 0844 numbers than for 01/02/03 numbers. Quote:
Since no plans include 0844 numbers the caller has no way to avoid paying more money to call a GP than they would have done had the GP been using an 01/02/03 number. Quote:
You cannot shift the blame on to the caller. No mobile phone provider offers calls at the same rate as 01/02/03 numbers to 0844 numbers. All of them charge more for 0844 numbers. Where plans include free or inclusive minutes to 01/02/03 numbers, none of them include free or inclusive minutes to 0844 numbers. GPs are required to take these factors into account when choosing a number for people to call them. 0844 numbers fail these test on all counts. Additionally, it is not BMA guidance that GPs have to follow. It is Department of Health guidance that prevails. |
Title: Re: Dr. Glencross surgery refutes ban on 0844 numbers. Post by catj on Jun 14th, 2012 at 9:26pm Quote:
They certainly have not. In particular the Secretary of State recently said: We have made it very clear that GPs should not be using 0844 numbers for that purpose and charging patients for them. http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2012-03-27a.1326.4&s=%28no+OR+not%29+AND+0844+AND+numbers#g1327.0 and in longer form... http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201212/cmhansrd/cm120124/halltext/120124h0002.htm#12012442000359 Quote:
Older people often cannot use the internet. And what's with the odd spacing of the number? Is that an attempt to 'hide' it from looking like an 0844 number: using the more usual 0844 815 1023 format makes that more clear. Quote:
Whilst this is helpful, it does not fix the problem that initial telephone contact with the surgery is charged as a "premium rate call" at rates above those that would have been incurred had the GP chosen an 01/02/03 number for their surgery. The quoted text as shown on the surgery website sets out to blame the caller and their provider for the excessive cost. In reality the blame is 100% with the GP for using an 0844 number. 0844 numbers were banned for use within the NHS in April 2010 with a one year grace period which expired in April 2011. No surgeries should be using 0844 numbers. http://community.virginmedia.com/t5/Telephone/0844-numbers/td-p/1151271 http://www.hi-mag.com/health-insurance/product-area/cash-plans-dental/article395073.ece |
Title: Re: Dr. Glencross surgery refutes ban on 0844 numbers. Post by SilentCallsVictim on Jun 14th, 2012 at 11:32pm
Just two general points to add to the fine comments.
In my view, there is nothing to object to about the Surgery Line system, or even the ridiculous idea that a GP surgery needs to take advantage of the features of non-geographic numbers. The point is that in the NHS, the cost of the system cannot be subsidised by patients and other callers, as will inevitably be the case if a 084 (rather than a 03) number is used. Use of 084 numbers has been "illegal" (not just "banned"), since 2010, because of the terms of the legally enforceable contract between the PCT and the practice. (The references to Directions to NHS bodies, which have no legal force, are spurious because the practice is not a NHS body.) The only way that the practice could demonstrate that it is legal for it to continue using a 084 number would be if it could show that the option of migrating to the equivalent 034 number for the remaining term of the Surgery Line contract (an option which is specifically offered by NEG / Daisy) would cause the practice to incur irregular costs imposed by Daisy that are not "reasonable". |
Title: Re: Dr. Glencross surgery refutes ban on 0844 numbers. Post by catj on Jun 17th, 2012 at 2:30pm
So that people can made up their own mind, here are the detailed call costs.
NHS regulations require that callers pay no more to call a GP than calling a geographic 01 or 02 number using the same method (i.e. calling both from a landine or calling both from a mobile). Mobile phone contract deals usually come with a number of inclusive minutes to 01/02/03/07 numbers. Not taking into account the value of any text message allowances and internet access that is also bundled with many of the current deals, and assuming all of the minutes are used, contracts cost in the region of:
These are approximate figures as each network varies their deals a little. The inclusive minutes can be used to call 01/02/03/07 numbers. They cannot be used to call 0844 and most other types of non-geographic numbers. If some or all of the included text message allowance and/or internet allowance is also used, the effective pence per minute rate for calling 01/02/03 numbers is even lower than the above estimates. If only half of the inclusive minutes are used, the effective pence per minute rate for calling 01/02/03 numbers is, in the vast majority of cases, still very much less than the additional price of calling an 0844 number. Calls to 0844 numbers cost 20.4, 25, 35, 40 or 41 pence per minute depending on the provider and the deal, and the majority charge 35 pence per minute or more. Mobile phone 'Pay as you Go' deals are simply charged at a fixed pence per minute rate, with calls to 0844 numbers usually costing more than to 01/02/03 numbers. In some cases it is possible to purchase a larger amount of minutes for calling 01/02/03 numbers for a fixed fee. 0844 numbers are not included. Some of these plans are detailed below. It is easy to compare the prices for 0844 numbers and for 01/02/03 numbers from the major providers either for out of bundle minutes on contract deals or for pay as you go tariffs. These can be seen below. Three mobile contract
Vodafone mobile contract
Three mobile pay as you go
Vodafone mobile pay as you go
Orange mobile pay as you go Racoon
Orange mobile pay as you go Dolphin
Orange mobile pay as you go Monkey
O2 mobile pay as you go
O2 mobile contract
Virgin mobile contract
Virgin mobile pay as you go
Virgin mobile Original pay as you go
Someone else may care to look at the charges from T-mobile, ASDA, Tesco, TalkMobile, etc, but they are unlikely to be much different to those listed above. The most recent DHS guidelines at: http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_132809 specifically state the requirements apply equally for callers using landlines and mobile phones. Calls to 0844 numbers usually cost more than calling 01/02/03 numbers. 0844 numbers are effectively banned for all GPs and have been since April 2010. |
Title: Re: Dr. Glencross surgery refutes ban on 0844 numbers. Post by catj on Dec 8th, 2012 at 9:01pm
This information was so good, I copied it here...
The only way that GPs can continue using 0844 numbers is if NONE of their patients have these call plans: Fixed lines: AOL "Unlimited" BT "Anytime" First Telecom "Anytime" First Telecom "Evening & Weekend" O2 Home Phone "Anytime" Orange Home Phone "Anytime Calls" Phone Co-op "Anytime" Pipex "Anytime" Plusnet "Anytime" Primus Saver "Phone Max" Sky Talk "Unlimited" TalkTalk "Anytime" TalkTalk Onetel "Total UK Talk" Tesco Home Phone "Anytime" Vodafone at Home Virgin Media "Anytime" YourCalls.net "Anytime" YourCalls.net "Evening & Weekend" Mobile phones: 3 Pay Monthly 3 Pay as you Go Giffgaff O2 Pay Monthly O2 Pay as you Go Orange Pay Monthly Orange Pay as you Go T-Mobile Pay Monthly T-Mobile Pay as you Go Vectone Mobile Pay Monthly Vectone Mobile Pay as you Go Virgin Mobile Pay Monthly Virgin Mobile Pay as you Go Vodafone Pay Monthly Public payphones: BT Payphones All of the above plans charge "more" to call 0844 numbers than to call 01, 02 and 03 numbers. |
Title: Re: Dr. Glencross surgery refutes ban on 0844 numbers. Post by speedy on Dec 9th, 2012 at 2:44am
Thanks catj for that info - I would like to copy/paste your list into my reply to my PCT after recieving their answer to my complaint about their lack of action regarding the 0844 numbers on their 'Patch' and their intention to recommend the 2 Tier NHS with the added geo. line currently being peddled by Daisy to aid compliance with the 0844 number.(effectively admitting 0844 does not comply)
Your list plus the call cost from a Public Payphone (provided by SCV) is just what I needed for my reply to their letter indicating the actions they will be taking. Then I will be escalating this to the Health Ombudsman as the PCT suggested if not satisfied. |
Title: Re: Dr. Glencross surgery refutes ban on 0844 numbers. Post by catj on Dec 9th, 2012 at 3:20am
The list was originally compiled by Dave and posted in a much older thread where I found it the other day.
There are other providers that could be added to that list, but there's no real need to do so. Taking the GMS provisions literally (as you should), as soon as there is one patient that has a phone deal where 0844 numbers "cost more" than 01, 02 and 03 numbers, the GP cannot use an 0844 number for the surgery. To infer that it is OK for some patients to "pay more" would be to ignore the "arrangement as a whole" clause. I cannot believe the amount of Brass Neck that Daisy/NEG have shown with their latest wheeze to prolong the life of banned 0844 numbers by promoting a two-tier NHS. The 0844 debacle has been going on for 7 years, and tens of millions of pounds have been pocketed at the expense of NHS patients. |
Title: Re: Dr. Glencross surgery refutes ban on 0844 numbers. Post by Dave on Dec 9th, 2012 at 9:47am
fairtelecoms has published a list of tariffs for which 0844 and 0845 numbers are more expensive as part of its call charges research.
|
SAYNOTO0870.COM » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved. |