SAYNOTO0870.COM | |
https://www.saynoto0870.com/cgi-bin/forum/YaBB.cgi
Main Forum >> Government and Public Sector >> Ashley Medical Centre refutes ban on 0844 numbers. https://www.saynoto0870.com/cgi-bin/forum/YaBB.cgi?num=1339831965 Message started by catj on Jun 16th, 2012 at 7:32am |
Title: Ashley Medical Centre refutes ban on 0844 numbers. Post by catj on Jun 16th, 2012 at 7:32am
Re: http://www.ashleymedicalcentre.co.uk/website/Z00256/files/NEG_RESPONSE_TO_DAILY_MAIL_ARTICLE_AND_OTHER_ANTI_084_CAMPAIGNERS.doc
Quote:
Untrue. The Secretary of State has recently stated: We have made it very clear that GPs should not be using 0844 numbers for that purpose and charging patients for them. http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2012-03-27a.1326.4&s=%28no+OR+not%29+AND+0844+AND+numbers#g1327.0 0844 numbers are clearly banned. Quote:
Consulting a list of call charges from all major landline and mobile providers shows that calls to 0844 numbers are more expensive than calls to 01/02/03 numbers. Quote:
Don't try to make out that "only slightly more expensive" would be OK. It isn't. Quote:
This is completely false. NEG do not set the call cost. The call cost is set by the callers supplier. They will charge a rate for the call and then add on the "premium" that has to be passed on to NEG. And, while you might falsely claim compliance by talking about calling from landlines, the "arrangement as a whole" has to be considered. This includes calls from mobile lines and calls where the caller has inclusive minutes. In both of those cases, callers pay considerably more to call 0844 numbers. Where inclusive minutes are involved, these are usually only for 01/02/03 and 07 numbers. This is the reason that 0844 numbers are banned. Quote:
Calls to 0844 numbers do cost more than calls to 01/02/03 numbers. They are therefore not allowed to be used. Quote:
The call rates for all major providers are available online. It would take just a few minutes to confirm that 0844 numbers cost more to call than 01/02/03 numbers. Quote:
The letter is worthless. Since the price of calling 0844 numbers includes a premium that has to be passed on to the GPs telephone services supplier, and callers with inclusive minutes cannot use them to call 0844 numbers, 0844 are banned from use. This is very clear to see. Quote:
It isn't BMA guidance that GPs should be following. It is the DoH guidelines and the wording of the GMS contract. Additionally, the GPs service provider cannot provide these assurances. There are several reasons for this. There is no such thing as a 'local call' and it is the callers provider that sets the call charges not the GPs. |
Title: Re: Ashley Medical Centre refutes ban on 0844 numbers. Post by catj on Jun 16th, 2012 at 7:33am Quote:
There is no such thing a "local rate" and hasn't been for many years. However, there is a "geographic rate" and calls to that cost less than calling 0844 numbers. Where callers have inclusive minutes they pay nothing for the individual call when calling 01/02/03 numbers. 0844 numbers are banned. Quote:
Yes they have. The Secretary of State recently said: We have made it very clear that GPs should not be using 0844 numbers for that purpose and charging patients for them. http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2012-03-27a.1326.4&s=%28no+OR+not%29+AND+0844+AND+numbers#g1327.0 Quote:
They did this based on the false assurance that most calls to 0844 numbers cost the same as 01/02/03 numbers. This can easily be shown to be untrue. Additionally, 'most calls' no longer cuts it as the "arrangement as a whole" has to be considered. Quote:
They are almost always more expensive. The vast majority of callers pay more or substantially more to call 0844 than to call 01/02/03 numbers. There are very few circumstances where this is not the case. Quote:
While this might be the case, stating the lowest price for 0844 and the highest price for 01/02/03 numbers hides one fact. These are unusual prices: for the vast majority of callers, 0844 will always be more. For callers with inclusive minutes this is especially so as they cannot use them to call 0844 numbers. Quote:
Whether they over-estimate the cost or not is completely irrelevent. And why mention 0845, we're talking about 0844 here. The fact is 0844 numbers do cost more than calling a geographic number, and are therefore banned. Quote:
No they do not. There's the little business of the "premium" which the caller has to pay to the GPs service provider. If the callers provider were to absorb that cost, they would have to make a loss on every 0844 call they handled. Quote:
This is very misleading. The GPs provider can set only the amount of premium the caller will pay on top of the normal price for the call. The callers provider sets the actual call cost that the caller will pay. Quote:
NEG do not have to comply with anything the BMA has said, especially when BMA guidance is both misleading and incorrect. NEG has to comply with the provisions of the GMS contract issued by DoH. In that regard, they are not compliant. |
Title: Re: Ashley Medical Centre refutes ban on 0844 numbers. Post by catj on Jun 16th, 2012 at 7:33am Quote:
It is easy to show that call from landlines to 0844 numbers and calls from mobiles to 0844 numbers cost more than calls to 01/02/03 numbers for the vast majority of callers. It is clear that for GPs, 0844 numbers are banned. Quote:
Since the GPs service provider does not set the price that callers pay, any such assurance is false. The callers call proces are set by the callers provider. 0844 numbers cost more to call then 01/02/03 numbers. Quote:
0844 numbers are banned. That is clear to see. Quote:
Any such confirmation is false. 0844 numbers are banned. Quote:
We are confident that Ashley Medical Centre has been fed misleading and incorrect information by their supplier. In effect AMC has been hoodwinked into taking a deal which is bad for patients and which also sees NEG raking off a percentage for all calls placed to the surgery. |
Title: Re: Ashley Medical Centre refutes ban on 0844 numbers. Post by catj on Jun 16th, 2012 at 8:12am
There are several more comments to add to the above, which I will do later today (or tomorrrow)...
NHS regulations require that callers pay no more to call a GP than calling a geographic 01 or 02 number using the same method (i.e. calling both from a landine or calling both from a mobile). Mobile phone contract deals usually come with a number of inclusive minutes to 01/02/03/07 numbers. Not taking into account the value of any text message allowances and internet access that is also bundled with many of the current deals, and assuming all of the minutes are used, contracts cost in the region of:
These are approximate figures as each network varies their deals a little. The inclusive minutes can be used to call 01/02/03/07 numbers. They cannot be used to call 0844 and most other types of non-geographic numbers. If some or all of the included text message allowance and/or internet allowance is also used, the effective pence per minute rate for calling 01/02/03 numbers is even lower than the above estimates. If only half of the inclusive minutes are used, the effective pence per minute rate for calling 01/02/03 numbers is, in the vast majority of cases, still very much less than the additional price of calling an 0844 number. Calls to 0844 numbers cost 20.4, 25, 35, 40 or 41 pence per minute depending on the provider and the deal, and the majority charge 35 pence per minute or more. Mobile phone 'Pay as you Go' deals are simply charged at a fixed pence per minute rate, with calls to 0844 numbers usually costing more than to 01/02/03 numbers. In some cases it is possible to purchase a larger amount of minutes for calling 01/02/03 numbers for a fixed fee. 0844 numbers are not included. Some of these plans are detailed below. It is easy to compare the prices for 0844 numbers and for 01/02/03 numbers from the major providers either for out of bundle minutes on contract deals or for pay as you go tariffs. These can be seen below. Three mobile contract
Vodafone mobile contract
Three mobile pay as you go
Vodafone mobile pay as you go
Orange mobile pay as you go Racoon
Orange mobile pay as you go Dolphin
Orange mobile pay as you go Monkey
O2 mobile pay as you go
O2 mobile contract
Virgin mobile contract
Virgin mobile pay as you go
Virgin mobile Original pay as you go
Someone else may care to look at the charges from T-mobile, ASDA, Tesco, TalkMobile, etc, but they are unlikely to be much different to those listed above. The most recent DHS guidelines at: http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_132809 specifically state the requirements apply equally for callers using landlines and mobile phones. Calls to 0844 numbers usually cost more than calling 01/02/03 numbers. 0844 numbers are effectively banned for all GPs and have been since April 2010. |
Title: Re: Ashley Medical Centre refutes 0844 ban. Post by SilentCallsVictim on Jun 16th, 2012 at 9:58am catj wrote on Jun 16th, 2012 at 8:12am:
Again, well done for addressing the appalling detail. Much of this is lifted from an earlier document, which was later re-issued. Some of the same words are found on this web page and in this press release. I have not dedicated effort to addressing all of the specific points of this material, however I have dealt with a more recent item at some length - see Supporting Surgery Line. (These comments, and what follows, are not intended to undermine, or be set against, the fine work being done by catj. I seek simply to ensure that relevant material is noted and to perhaps ensure that effort is not unnecessarily duplicated.) The following comments provide some detail about the essential element of the NEG misrepresentation of the issue of call cost. (As referred to above, Daisy is now taking a slightly different line, following publication of the Department of Health "Further Guidance".) Quote:
These statements cleverly conflate two separate issues - [list bull-blacksq] A primary network telephone service provider has the ability to choose the absolute price per minute charged by BT Retail (up to "5p" per minute) for a block of 0844/3 numbers which are allocated to it. For the blocks assigned to NEG as a reseller TO GPs, Talk Talk Business (which was then known as "Opal Telecom") chose type 'g6' (5p per minute) and type 'g11' (4p per minute) when acquiring these allocations. (The rates given were set inclusive of VAT at 17.5%. When VAT was raised to 20%, it was the VAT-exclusive rates which remained fixed. This principle was applied to all NTS ranges.) Since 2004, there has been no meaningful absolute value for a "geographic rate" from BT. The former "BT Standard" tariff ceased to be the basis for BT call charges from that date and it now no longer applies to any customer. It is therefore no longer possible for the rate for a call to a 0844/3 number to be set with reference to a "geographic rate". (This was only ever true for BT anyway, but even that is now history.) The issue of relevance to the contractual conditions imposed on GPs in April 2010 (not the Directions to NHS bodies of December 2009) is what callers actually pay to make telephone calls to the surgery, as against the cost of an equivalent call to a geographic number. This is determined by their choice of arrangement with their telephone service provider . There is no such provider which has set its rate for calls to type 'g6' and type 'g11' numbers at less than that for geographic calls. There are however cases where subscribers have the option to choose a Call Plan excluding weekday daytime calls to geographic numbers. When making these "Out of Plan" calls, there are some cases where they incur a "penalty charge" that exceeds the charge for calls to type 'g11' and perhaps also 'g6' numbers. (In the case of Virgin Media, the "Out of Plan" penalty charge currently falls between the rates for g11 and g6.) The NHS serves those who do not choose a telephone call plan that excludes weekday daytime calls to geographic numbers, as well as the majority, which does not have the option to choose to pay more for weekday daytime calls to geographic numbers. Although NEG, as a separate company, or now as a member of the Daisy Group, neither applied for a block of 0844 numbers, nor sets call charge rates, it may be of interest to look at what Daisy Group has "chosen to do". Daisy Group (which acquired NEG after the quoted words were drafted, but before they were published in the document referred to) is a provider of telephone services to businesses. Although the NHS serves only individuals, not corporate entities, a business may have cause to make what are referred to as "relevant calls" in the GP contract. The respective rates for the relevant call types in the Daisy Base Fixed Line Call Tariff are as follows: [list bull-redsq] |
Title: Re: Ashley Medical Centre refutes ban on 0844 numbers. Post by catj on Jun 17th, 2012 at 2:40pm
Is this the place that NEG admits that patients of GPs using 0844 services have been overcharged by more than 27 million pounds for their calls so far?
http://www.phonepayplus.org.uk/For-Business/Consultations-and-Invitations-to-Tender/Previous-consultations/~/media/Files/PhonepayPlus/Consultation%20PDFs/084%20number%20range%20response%20Surgery%20Line%20response.pdf |
Title: Re: Ashley Medical Centre refutes ban on 0844 numbers. Post by speedy on Aug 5th, 2012 at 2:12am
Thanks for posting the link to the NEG/Daisy cries of pain at possibly having their activities chopped off ;D
Havent had such a good laugh in ages - lovely to see them squirm - they poked their fingers in their own eyes so often I lost count. (in effect admiting 0844 didn't comply) but they cant see it. Can you find any more like that from the Consultation responses - would love to have another good laugh. Wouldn't the bit in the EU Directive about these numbers not being allowed for Contact if there is Contract, Subscription or Membership - surely being on the GP Register is same as this. ::) |
SAYNOTO0870.COM » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved. |