As a matter of interest, I agree with your latter points. But we weren't talking about , it was about the . Queues happen whichever number you use, Geo or Non-Geo !
As for the , try looking at the TRUE cost to those without  the benefit of inclusive call plans. Doh !! It's the same ! Well I never.

My point was to find out from you -
Quote:
and to make the point on Telcos charges, which you obviously ignored.
Instead of sidestepping, try answering the questions and !

Kevin Kearney,

I note that you have posted here some or all of your response to the last Ofcom "consultation". However I also note that you are not included within the Ofcom published responses? Since you were prepared to publish your response on this forum I would presume that you did not withhold your permission for Ofcom to publish your response?

I am collecting examples of where Ofcom have evidently attempted to conceal the real number of adverse responses which they received on this subject. Can you please inform me whether you actually submitted your response on an official Ofcom form and whether you submitted it specifically as a consultation response rather then a complaint?  Also what date did you submit it please. I already have significant evidence that Ofcom have deliberately covered up the true avalanche of responses which they received.

Faz referred to a website that identifies the operator associated with a given code but couldn't remember the address.  Its http://www.ukphoneinfo.com/section/home/introduction.shtml for anybody interested.