Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
SAYNOTO0870.COM

<---- Back to main website

 
Home Help Search Login Register

Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Use of the word free in Ads. (Read 10,033 times)
bigjohn
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 2,316
Gender: male
Use of the word free in Ads.
Apr 27th, 2005 at 5:04pm
 
The ASA have recently ruled that advertisers must not  describe an offer as free if there are costs to consumers,other then non premium rate phone calls,postage,carriage or reasonable travel to collect the item.It goes on to say ( The Advertiser must make it clear the extent of the consumers liability for any costs).

So therefore if it is accepted that calls to 0844,0845,and 0870 are premium rate and the advertiser does does make it clear in the ad the true cost of the calls.There would appear to be grounds for complaint to the ASA.

I suppose it all hinges on whether or not the ASA consider 0844,0845,0870 calls to be premium rate.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Apr 27th, 2005 at 5:05pm by bigjohn »  

BJ.
 
IP Logged
 
dorf
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


I hate Qs on Premium NGNs

Posts: 575
UK
Gender: male
Re: Use of the word free in Ads.
Reply #1 - Apr 27th, 2005 at 8:58pm
 
BT now admit them to be Premium in their price lists. Ofcom have stated publicly that they are in effect Premium.
Back to top
 

Ofcom are completely ineffectual
 
IP Logged
 
bigjohn
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 2,316
Gender: male
Re: Use of the word free in Ads.
Reply #2 - Apr 28th, 2005 at 5:06pm
 
I have emailed the ASA to clarify this point.I will post the outcome.
Back to top
 

BJ.
 
IP Logged
 
bigjohn
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 2,316
Gender: male
Re: Use of the word free in Ads.
Reply #3 - May 3rd, 2005 at 12:33pm
 
The ASA have advised me that they do not consider 0844/0845/and 0870 numbers to be a premium service.

However they are recommending that advertisers adopt the OFCOM guidelines(see Telephone Helplines Posting for exact details.)
Back to top
 

BJ.
 
IP Logged
 
juby
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 203
Gloucestershire
Gender: male
Re: Use of the word free in Ads.
Reply #4 - May 4th, 2005 at 12:06pm
 
I suggest you ask the ASA what is the difference between 0871 and 0901, both cost exactly the same.

One is a premium number, the other one is not!

(According to them.)

juby
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
bigjohn
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 2,316
Gender: male
Re: Use of the word free in Ads.
Reply #5 - May 4th, 2005 at 12:15pm
 
Clearly they dont know there posterior from there elbow.
Back to top
 

BJ.
 
IP Logged
 
bill
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 193
Re: Use of the word free in Ads.
Reply #6 - May 4th, 2005 at 12:21pm
 
Quote:
I suggest you ask the ASA what is the difference between 0871 and 0901, both cost exactly the same.

One is a premium number, the other one is not!

(According to them.)

juby
That's not actually true. 

From a BT residential landline, calls to 0871 numbers cost 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or 10p per minute depending upon subsequent digits.

Similarly, calls to 0901 numbers cost up to £1.01 per minute depending upon subsequent digits.

The second I don't object to because users are required to publish the call cost.

The first is the problem because there is no requirement to publish the call cost, there are six different possibilities (which most people don't know anyway) and, being so similar to 0870, the 'charged at national call rate' ambiguity (lie) is again present.
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 4th, 2005 at 12:33pm by bill »  
 
IP Logged
 
juby
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 203
Gloucestershire
Gender: male
Re: Use of the word free in Ads.
Reply #7 - May 4th, 2005 at 11:26pm
 
Quote:
That's not actually true.  

OK I'll rephrase the question, I suggest you ask the ASA  what is the difference between an 0871 call (costing 10 pence per minute) and a 0901 call (costing 10 pence per minute) both cost exactly the same.  

One is a premium number, the other one is not!  

(According to them.)

The fact that I agree that the latter is fair because it states the cost is not the point, the fact that it is legally required in one case but not in the other is.

Whos side are you on? I am sure that most people got the point, and whoever heard of an advertiser using a 0871 number that cost less than 10 pence per minute?

juby
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 4th, 2005 at 11:35pm by juby »  
WWW  
IP Logged
 
bill
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 193
Re: Use of the word free in Ads.
Reply #8 - May 8th, 2005 at 8:05pm
 
Quote:
Whos side are you on?
I am not a politician and, as a result, I am on the side of truth.

Hence, the figures I quoted are truthful and are not selective to suit my argument.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dave
Global Moderator
*****
Offline



Posts: 9,902
Yorkshire
Gender: male
Re: Use of the word free in Ads.
Reply #9 - May 8th, 2005 at 8:34pm
 
ICSTIS don't require the cost to be displayed for 09 numbers which cost less than 50p.
Quote:
4.4.4 Direct-dialled services which cost 50 pence or less and are terminated by forced release are exempt from all ICSTIS requirements concerning pricing information.

Source: ICSTIS Code of Practice (Tenth edition) - January 2004


IMHO most 0871s are 10p/min. Why? The answer is simple, because no requirement for pricing information means that there is no incentive for lower charged numbers. Which is why Ofcom's idea of price competition between service providers is a complete load of rubbish.

Lower priced 0844/0871 numbers are often used for PAYG internet services and call carriers (for example, for overseas) where pricing information is given.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
(Moderators: Forum Admin, Dave, CJT-80, DaveM, bbb_uk)

Website and Content © 1999-2024 SAYNOTO0870.COM. All Rights Reserved.
Written permission is required to duplicate any of the content within this site.

WARNING: This is an open forum, posts are NOT endorsed by SAYNOTO0870.COM,
please exercise due caution when acting on any info from here.


SAYNOTO0870.COM » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved.


Valid RSS Valid XHTML Valid CSS Powered by Perl Source Forge