I have just received an email from Stephen Rimmer, HomeOffice (the return path I noticed was Anne Spoore). I and few other forum members were cc'd.
Quote:Message from Stephen Rimmer
To: Councillor Julian Shersby
Mole Valley District Councillor for Caper, Leigh and Newdigate
Dear Councillor Shersby
CASUALTY BUREAU HELPLINE NUMBER
You will recall that we spoke by telephone last Friday, in response to your E-mails to the Metropolitan Police and copied to, among others, Sir John Gieve, the Permanent Secretary at the Home Office. You may also be aware that your point has been echoed by a number of E-mail correspondents and in Parliamentary Questions. Both you and other correspondents have also made specific application for information under the Freedom of Information Act.
2. First of all, may I say that we welcome the detailed and persuasive argument that you have put forward for a change from the current arrangement to use an 0870 number to access the national helpline at times of major incident such as so tragically occurred last week. You will also be aware that, on Friday evening, at the Metropolitan Police Service's request, PITO provided a geographic number 020 7158 0010 to sit alongside the 0870 number already operating, and both numbers were published on the Metropolitan Police Service's website. The next step, as the Minister for Policing Hazel Blears has announced today, is to conduct an urgent review into the use of the 0870 number. I am leading that work. I enclose a copy of the Minister's statement for information.
3. I should make absolutely clear that neither the Home Office, nor PITO nor the police service has profited financially from the use of the 0870 number. Cable and Wireless, who are the current contractors providing the telephony service for the Police National Network, have already offered to donate their profits from the use of the 0870 number last week to the London Bombings Relief Fund and Hazel Blears has asked other major service providers to waive the charge to their customers or, if that is not possible, to make commensurate donations.
4. The purpose of this E-mail is to assure you that the issues you have raised are being addressed as a matter of high priority. I shall ensure that you receive a full response as soon as possible. In the meantime, I would be grateful if you would direct any further comments and queries to me in the first instance.
5. I have taken the liberty of giving this E-mail the same wide circulation as you have so that all copy recipients are aware that I am leading on this work. I have also copied it to other correspondents who have expressed similar views to yours.
Stephen Rimmer
Director of Policing Policy
I have a few questions as follows:-
Concerning point number 2:-
2.1. Would the geographical number have been released at all if it wasn't due to the public discuss and bad press?
Concerning point number 3:-
3.1. Did you receive any money whatsoever (no matter what it was used for) with regards to the use of such number?
Can anyone else think of other points I can raise?
UPDATE: I'm being a bit lazy here can anyone tell me has an FOI on The Met or home office revealed if they received any payments back whatsoever (no matter what they were used for) as I can't exactly remember?