pw4 wrote on Jan 23
rd, 2006 at 12:15am:
That most people assume that any number beginning with 07 is a mobile is not Patientline's fault. Anyone who wants to use a PNS number must use 070 - that was Oftel's decision. That the use of PNS for DDI calls to hospital patients is acceptable was Ofcom's.
But who initially proposed using a PNS number (which could co-incidentally be confused with a mobile number) - was it initially Patientline's or another service provider's request, or did Ofcom initiate the idea?
As I said in an earlier message:
trevord wrote on Jan 10
th, 2006 at 3:07pm:
... Patientline is not a true PNS ... the Patientline service merely directs the call to a particular fixed line phone, which is no different from a company switchboard with direct extension dialling - you just need to know the number of the relevant extension. So the Patientline-type service could be implemented by having a regular geo number of the format 01234 567xxx, where xxx is the extension number.
I accept that Ofcom approved this usage, but did Patientline or another service provider ask for it (with the possible confusion in mind)?
I also accept that the service provider [pw4 - I'm trying not to specifically blame Patientline!] is unlikely to have wanted to use a regular geo number becuase they need to recover some costs from the calls, but they could have used 0870 or 0871 or 09 numbers instead of 070 PNS numbers. I agree that the blame is partly Ofcom's for agreeing to this
mis-use of PNS, but without knowing details of the initial proposals, I'm not sure that we can say that this is purely Ofcom's fault.
Anyway, Patientline could have chosen a lower PNS rate.
And, also I can't currently find it (and need to go to bed) I have a recollection of reading that some of the alternative service providers do use 087x numbers, which would suggest the choice of 070 was Patientline's not Ofcom's.
Quote:To the best of my knowledge the charge ... is quoted as part of the long recorded message at the beginning of inbound calls.
So you're paying to listen to a long message telling you how expensive the call is - thus making it even more expensive - and, of course, by then you've already incurred, say, 50p - £1 of cost before you can even decide whether you're prepared to pay that much for the call!