mikeinnc wrote on Sep 6
th, 2007 at 3:37am:
Looks like Patientline directors have been greasing a few more palms......
"Patients' lives at risk from mobile signals"http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=4802... Quote:The scientists who carried out the tests want hospitals to ban mobiles from wards.
And I wonder how much Patientline paid these so-called anonymous "scientists" to make that observation? It's strange that it is
only in Rip Off Britain.....
no such problems in the USA or anywhere else, as far as I can tell. How very convenient!
Oh, wait a minute though......the US don't have a corrupt NHS!
There are now 12 comments on this item on the Daily Mail website : ---
Goodness we don't have any controls here in New Zealand, I text my parents from the theater during my Ceasarean op. to tell them what the baby was.
- Catherine., Hastings New Zealand
Are these medical devices subject to interference tests or CE approval? Virtually nothing else suffers in this way, not even the much talked about car air bags.
Is this an attempt by hospital trusts to force patients to use their extortionately expensive bedside telephones?
- Dave, Howden, UK
A few weeks ago it was "proved" mobile phones do not interfere with medical equipment. Now it's been "proved" they do. Methinks research just proves anything it wants to - it just depends on who is bankrolling the research.
- Gill, Ramsgate, Kent
I fail to see that just because a mobile phone signal interferes with medical equipment means that it is a danger to health.
There are lots of electronic devices that interfere with other electronic equipment. For example as I type this comment I noticed some 'noise' on a radio close by, moving my laptop decreases it, so obviously there are all sorts of signals going through my body as I type!
CB and taxi transmitters can commonly be heard 'breaking though' on TVs etc, so are these singals making us ill as well?
I think that we are becoming a little paranoid about all of this (or perhaps I should be worried about my computer?)
- Rob Southerington, Syston Leicestershire
For goodness' sake - any and all forms of electronic and electrical equipment radiate some part of the electromagnetic spectrum. Therefore it is likely that mobile phones, bleepers, pagers and even PCs could cause interference with other electronic equipment in any situation and more especially hospitals unless they are in a 'screened' room, that is one with a shield within the walls and doors that stops such radiation seeping out. I despair at the general ignorance of the commercial world!
- Ken, Suffolk, England
Why have these very simple tests taken so many years?
It indicates a lack of social responsibility on the part of the mobile phone manufacturers and the mobile phone network Companies.
- K Urban, London UK
The problem is not the mobile phones - it's the medical equipment manufacturers not sheilding their equipment properly from electrical interference. All medical kit should be sheilded properly.
- Marc, Essex,UK
At last somebody with common sense. I think mobile phones are very important, for peoples piece of mind, and security, but I wish they were banned from being used on public transport. I feel most embarressed FORCED to listen to other people's conversations.
- Derek, Birmingham
Probably a 'Scam' to secure a ban on their use so that patients have to use the Hospital phone set up, and as such pay the extortionate rates demanded. They must all think we are stupid!
- Gordon, France
So, now will be get all medical and non-medical staff to hand in their mobile phones to the reception desk as they report for work.
- Keith Jones, Hartlepool
So modify the equipment so it's screened from mobile signals. It's the equipment that's at fault not the mobiles.
- Epimethean, Surrey
The actual report by the journal "Critical Care" states that Critical care equipment is vulnerable with median distances of about 3cm. That is just over 1 inch!
The scientists who did this research did NOT use real mobile phones, they "mimicked the sort of signals emitted"! What sort of objective scientific test is that? Why not use real phones?
Who paid for this research and why was it not done in the UK?
According to the report the results are only relevant in critical care situations and are not applicable to hospital equipment generally.
The DoH are right to be sceptical about the validity of this report. Are mobile phones banned in hospitals in any other country? They are not banned in the USA.
Treat this report with scepticism.
- Cyril, UK