Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
SAYNOTO0870.COM

<---- Back to main website

 
Home Help Search Login Register

Pages: 1 2 3 4
Send Topic Print
Hansard - NTS review outcome? (Read 50,524 times)
idb
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1,499
Miami, Florida, United States
Gender: male
Hansard - NTS review outcome?
Jul 29th, 2005 at 8:35pm
 
My interpretation - Bruce may know the outcome, or at least part of it, of the Ofcom review. Any thoughts?

<<

Questions for Oral or Written Answer
beginning on Thursday 21 July 2005
(the 'Questions Book')

Part 1: Written Questions for Answer on
Thursday 21 July 2005


779
Malcolm Bruce (Gordon):To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, what assessment has been made of the likely impact Ofcom's proposed changes to (a) the 0870 number range and (b) 0845 numbers could have on those industries which rely on these number ranges to fund or subsidise the cost of providing other services to consumers.
(15007)  
780
Malcolm Bruce (Gordon):To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, what assessment has been made of the likely impact Ofcom's proposal to remove revenue sharing of the 0870 number range will have on the Number Translation Service industry.
(15008)  
781
Malcolm Bruce (Gordon):To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, what assessment has been made of the likely impact Ofcom's proposal to maintain the current price per minute rates for 0845 numbers for a two year period will have on internet service providers' ability to take advantage of British Telecom's next generation network roll-out.
(15009)  
782
Malcolm Bruce (Gordon):To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, if he will bring forward measures (a) to help consumers understand the pricing of calls to Number Translation Services and (b) to ensure providers who charge more than the standard fixed line rate make a pre-announcement to consumers using their services.

>>

Also:

QUESTIONS FOR WRITTEN ANSWER AWAITING ANSWER
21st JULY 2005


(13th July)

The Lord Tyler—To ask Her Majesty's Government why the recommendations of the Central Office of Information on the need to avoid using 0870 and other premium charge telephone numbers for the public to obtain official information have not been followed in the case of the number given to those seeking information about victims of the London bombing incidents. [HO] (HL1240)


Back to top
« Last Edit: Jul 29th, 2005 at 8:54pm by idb »  

As from November 21, 2013, I no longer participate in the forum and am unable to receive private messages.
 
IP Logged
 
NonGeographicalMan
Ex Member


Re: Hansard
Reply #1 - Jul 29th, 2005 at 8:43pm
 
It looks to me like Malcolm Bruce MP has had a tipoff from someone in the telcos attending all those cosy NTS Focus Group sessions? Wink I do hope that Mr Bruce is not a shareholder in one of those NTS number selling operations?  Or perhaps he is a director of one of the main call centre receiving scam merchants. Roll Eyes

Do I detect that Ofcom is now going to try and bury a set of highly consumer unfriendly proposals for reforming NTS in the middle of August when there won't be enough people around to shoot them down over it? Shocked

Who me cynical! Grin
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jul 29th, 2005 at 8:44pm by N/A »  
 
IP Logged
 
idb
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1,499
Miami, Florida, United States
Gender: male
Re: Hansard
Reply #2 - Jul 29th, 2005 at 8:49pm
 
Quote:
It looks to me like Malcolm Bruce MP has had a tipoff from someone in the telcos attending all those cosy NTS Focus Group sessions? Wink I do hope that Mr Bruce is not a shareholder in one of those NTS number selling operations?  Or perhaps he is a director of one of the main call centre receiving scam merchants. Roll Eyes
Just what I thought. Interestingly, the NTS focus group minutes (http://www.ofcom.org.uk/telecoms/groups/nts_focus/notes/?a=87101) of the meetings of May 19 and June 30 have not yet been posted. I wrote to Ofcom yesterday asking why these are not available but no response to date. If nothing turns up on Monday, I'll be submitting yet another FOIA request.
Back to top
 

As from November 21, 2013, I no longer participate in the forum and am unable to receive private messages.
 
IP Logged
 
bill
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 193
Re: Hansard
Reply #3 - Jul 29th, 2005 at 8:51pm
 
[quote]Malcolm Bruce (Gordon):To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, what assessment has been made of the likely impact Ofcom's proposal to remove revenue sharing of the 0870 number range will have on the Number Translation Service industry.[/quote]
No prizes for answering that one - they'll all change to the (more expensive) 0871 number range.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
idb
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1,499
Miami, Florida, United States
Gender: male
Re: Hansard - NTS review outcome?
Reply #4 - Jul 29th, 2005 at 9:02pm
 
Also, at least one MP seems to have read some of the FOIA responses:

http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/archives/2005/07/index.html

Regular readers might know that I have been impressed with a site called money saving expert. Martin Lewis, who runs it, has created a community of consumers who challenge big corporates into offering better value to you and me. Did you know for example that all those 0870 numbers we have to call only to be left on hold for ages, generate a fortune for the companies that provide them? Anyway, there's a web site dedicated to consumers who say enough is enough - say no to 0870. It provides alternative numbers and ways to get around paying the inflated prices these companies charge. Ironically, the site it partly funded by Google adwords that you guessed it, throw up a rather large number of ads for companies with 0870 numbers! Have a look at how site users are using the Freedom of Information Act to make their point.

Back to top
 

As from November 21, 2013, I no longer participate in the forum and am unable to receive private messages.
 
IP Logged
 
NonGeographicalMan
Ex Member


Re: Hansard
Reply #5 - Jul 29th, 2005 at 9:03pm
 
[quote author=bill  link=1122669309/0#3 date=1122670278]
No prizes for answering that one - they'll all change to the (more expensive) 0871 number range.
[/quote]
Many call centres will change to 0871 but not all.  Quite a few companies running 0870s were scammed into taking the numbers and if 0870 becomes ordinary national rate with no revenue share they won't actually move to 0871.

0871 is not quite the evil varmit it is painted to be since its lowest call rate is actually 6p per minute and 10p per minute is merely the highest rate allowed.  But how are people supposed to cope with the same dialling code having different hidden call prices unless there are clear price announcements.  Ofcom tell us that more disclosure is the answer and yet a major city regulator like the FSA still still tells us on their website that 0845 is "local call rate".

It will be little short of an outrage if the revenue share needs of a few withering dialup 0845 ISPs let revenue share remain for all other 0845 voice based numbers.  What happens then?  Do all ethical 0845 voice numbers have to move to 0870?

Can one assume that most revenue sharing call centres will be the last businesses in the UK to permit IP based phone access and that they will carry on using POTS numbering until it is abolished in about 2015?  Also presumably Ofcom will no doubt permit charging for computer to computer voip call centre access>
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
juby
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 203
Gloucestershire
Gender: male
Re: Hansard
Reply #6 - Jul 29th, 2005 at 10:30pm
 
[quote author=NonGeographicalMan  link=1122669309/0#5 date=1122670995]
 Also presumably Ofcom will no doubt permit charging for computer to computer voip call centre access>[/quote]

Of course they will!
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
PeDaSp
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 111
Re: Hansard
Reply #7 - Jul 29th, 2005 at 10:56pm
 
Don't worry folks - VoIP is just like email and will be the death of all this POTS/0870 nonsense.

It'll take a couple of years - but it will come ;D
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
NonGeographicalMan
Ex Member


Re: Hansard
Reply #8 - Jul 30th, 2005 at 12:08am
 
Quote:
Don't worry folks - VoIP is just like email and will be the death of all this POTS/0870 nonsense.

It'll take a couple of years - but it will come Grin


I think you must have a reassuringly naive view of the world PeDaSp.

The customer abusing companies out there like Easyjet have a different method of cost efficiently dealing with email correspondence that they don't wish to deal with.  That method is to simply say on their website that they do not guarantee it will be responded to and to then plough it all down a large electronic blackhole.  Easyjet even send out their marketing emails with the reply address of blackhole@easyjet.com.

Since employing staff in call centres involves bodies and time there is no way that people like Easyjet and RyanAir are going to go on taking voice calls unless Ofcom allows them to impose a 50p per minute credit card charge on voip.  Ditto for live sex chat lines and premium legal advice lines.  People aren't just going to now run these for free just because the delivery method is now voip.  Unless of course we had a regulator who said that they weren't allowed to do this. Roll Eyes

So you are wrong, wrong, wrong PeDaSp.  Requiring Voip support will be chargeable with many companies in the future in precisely the same way as 084x/087x/070x and 090x are currently used. Angry
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Tanllan
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 797
Gender: male
Re: Hansard
Reply #9 - Jul 30th, 2005 at 9:45am
 
[quote author=NonGeographicalMan  link=1122669309/0#5 date=1122670995]
 But how are people supposed to cope with the same dialling code having different hidden call prices unless there are clear price announcements.  [/quote]
Free front-end announcements would be the answer, but Ofcom might be concerned that they are too expensive to provide (so just how do 18866 and 1899 manage?) and not always technically possible.
But really the 08 scams must stop and we must have proper announcements on 09X.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
NonGeographicalMan
Ex Member


Re: Hansard
Reply #10 - Jul 30th, 2005 at 10:49am
 
Quote:
But really the 08 scams must stop and we must have proper announcements on 09X.

And we must have proper announcements on all the 07 and 08 scams too please.

50p per minute for 0800 on a mobile phone or for an 07 number that costs 50p at all times on a landline is surely also likely to not be the level of charging that the customer was actually expecting?

The fact that call18866 can do this for 2p per call surely says these announcements are not expensive.  It is just that Ofcom and their cosy little industry chums at the NTS Focus Groups meetings seem to think it might be damaging for the bloated profitability of the uk telcos.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
PeDaSp
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 111
Re: Hansard - NTS review outcome?
Reply #11 - Jul 30th, 2005 at 11:12am
 
You make some good points NGM - and it will be interesting to see what happens.

My point is that VoIP is like email in that it is totally FREE (apart from the internet connection). Even when you call a normally POTS number via VoIP it can be free.

1. VoIP to VoIP calls are free. And as peering arrangements between providers, and the ability to dial URL VoIP address on more sophisticated and dedicated VoIP IP hardware and software phones becomes more prevalent, then a worldwide VoIP network will develop. (Most likely based on SIP - folks like Skype will either die out or move to SIP).

2. A number of worldwide "lookup" databases to link POTS numbers to their associated VoIP address are now coming online. Some such as enum work at the teleco level (allowing providers to charge for a call that is free to them); but others will work at the user level. These databases (effectively DNS lookup for VoIP), mean that if I dial a POTS number a search will be made for an associated VoIP address - and that will be used to place a free call - if such an address exists.

3. The cost of VoIP calls that breakout into the POTS work are already coming down. Providers such as Broadvoice.com charge just $20 for unlimited calls to over 24 countries. And some providers such as voipbuster.com give free POTS calls to a range of countries (but how long this will last for remains to be seen). Of course just like email you can have multiple VoIP accounts and just select the best one for your current call.

4. There will be an explosion of VoIP use as combined WiFi VoIP/Mobile phones and pure WiFi VoIP (VoWLAN) phones come online. This is all linked to the broadband/WiFi/WiMAX rollout.

5. VoIP is going to be totally integrated into web browsers and applications. This is already happening. VoIP softphones will be built into browsers and/or the URL of VoIP hardphones will be linked to active URL VoIP address on webpages - just like your email program is linked to email URLs. So just as now you click on an email link and your email program opens with the destination email address opens; so you will click on a VoIP URL and your soft/hard phone will dial the VoIP number.

6. VoIP providers are getting more and more wary about allowing access to any premium rate or NGN POTS numbers worldwide. This is because they are falling prey to scammers who use abritage to make millions. (Even normal POTS telcos fall prey to this). They are also limiting access as they cannot keep track of all the differing charges worldwide. Or they are massively marking-up such calls.

My Broadvoice account allowed unlimited calls to 0870 and 0845 for 5 months until they got the bill from Global Crossing!!!! So as folks move over to pure VoIP their access to NGN numbers will decrease.

7. It's possible that specialist VoIP providers will develop giving access to premium rate and NGN numbers - but they charge an excess. Plus you will be fully aware that you are making a chargeable call.

8. Most call centres; large corps and gov departments already have pure VoIP internal networks. So it will be technically possible for them to switch to VoIP for incoming calls. You can buy VoIP servers that can handle thousands of VoIP calls for a couple of thousand dollars ("Asterisk" VoIP sw is free). And bandwith cost is coming down.


Now at present users are fooled into calling 0870 number etc... as the believe they are just paying a "normal" phone call rate.

BUT with the expansion of VoIP, users will start to expect that they should pay NOTHING for ANY phone call to ANYWHERE. And as VoIP becomes easier and more ubiquitous SOME companies will start to give out VoIP numbers and VoIP URL addresses.

Slowly but surely the wheels of free market capitalism will grind and companies will use VoIP to differentiate themselves and grab consumers who are VoIP aware. How will companies NOT be able to have a VoIP URL that the consumer will be able to click on and instantly connect to a call centre?

This is not "we'll call you back" buttons where you enter your telephone number. This is instant connection. I have already trialed such a system on one of my own companies webpage. Customers clicked on a button and then heard me talking to them via their computer's speakers and microphone. THEY ARE GOBSMACKED! Smiley) They don't even need to have a VoIP soft/hardphone or even know what VOIP is.

...

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
PeDaSp
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 111
Re: Hansard - NTS review outcome?
Reply #12 - Jul 30th, 2005 at 11:13am
 
...

My first email account was with Compuserve. I paid per KB and could only email other Compuserve users. Most folks had never head of email; and almost NO companies and government departments had email address. Now look at the world!

Companies will not be able to "charge" for VoIP as this would be an oxymoron. VoIP will equal FREE. Just like email is FREE (compared to a letter). VoIP calls that are chargeable will simply not be seen as VoIP calls at all.

Do you know of ANY company that charges for email enquiries? Yes, they may not reply to email to force you to call the 0870 number; but not answering a VoIP number to force you to PAY to call ANY POTS number - even a geographic landline - would just make consumers call elsewhere.

So at present consumers don't get too miffed at calling 0870/45/71 numbers as they just think these are normal phone costs - or just a bit more.

But when VoIP happens big time they will ask why am I even being required to call an 020 number and pay when it's free to call my granny in Australia with VoIP?

Of course at the end of the day all this makes no difference at all to anything really. The cost of call centers will have to be paid somehow. Either through increased cost of goods and services; increased taxes (for gov depts); or even increased pension costs/lower savings rates, as companies lower their profits (and thus cut dividends to pension investors etc...)

Still it's fun and a good theory - time will tell!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
NonGeographicalMan
Ex Member


Re: Hansard - NTS review outcome?
Reply #13 - Jul 30th, 2005 at 11:37am
 
Quote:
Do you know of ANY company that charges for email enquiries? Yes, they may not reply to email to force you to call the 0870 number; but not answering a VoIP number to force you to PAY to call ANY POTS number - even a geographic landline - would just make consumers call elsewhere.

So at present consumers don't get too miffed at calling 0870/45/71 numbers as they just think these are normal phone costs - or just a bit more.

But when VoIP happens big time they will ask why am I even being required to call an 020 number and pay when it's free to call my granny in Australia with VoIP?


PeDaSp I note your clearly learned technical expertise on Voip and its future techncial rollout which is clearly greater than mine.

Nonetheless taking your points above I note that Easyjet now charge £1 a minute on an 0906 number for technical advice on how to use their website and 65p per minute for telephone bookings on an 0905 number that costs even more from mobiles and BT payphones.   These numbers do not rely on people wrongly thinking the call cost is only at the BT National Rate.  They rely on them knowing it is going to cost them a lot more.

Their old 0870 customer contact centre number still exists but is now barred if it is called from within the UK even if you withhold your number.  UK customers now have to call a 10p per minute 0871 number which is in practice almost useless as there are endless menus that deliberately try to prevent you from speaking to anyone.  Next month that will be on 0905 too.

Companies like Easyjet seem to be able to get away with selling a bad product aggressively to a dumb public because most of the public only respond to criticism that is printed in the newspapers and mysteriously Easyjet is hardly ever publicly criticised for its many quite deplorable customer services practices.

I see everything moving towards online ordering forms and query screens with large corporates and with the government.  If you want a voice mechanism they are going to charge extra.  You will note that most sex webcams on the internet do seem to manage to find a way to charge for their services online and stuff sold on auctions on ebay is not actually sold for free.

So technically speaking providing free voip calls is no issue but unfortunately these large corporates no longer want to talk to you for free.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jul 30th, 2005 at 11:43am by N/A »  
 
IP Logged
 
Tanllan
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 797
Gender: male
Re: Hansard
Reply #14 - Jul 30th, 2005 at 12:43pm
 
Quote:
And we must have proper announcements on all the 07 and 08 scams too please.

50p per minute for 0800 on a mobile phone or for an 07 number that costs 50p at all times on a landline is surely also likely to not be the level of charging that the customer was actually expecting?

Exactly right. Tks NGM - sorry, Saturday morning and not fully with it  Embarrassed
Perhaps full free front-end announcent on all calls is the answer.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Send Topic Print
(Moderators: Dave, CJT-80, bbb_uk, Forum Admin, DaveM)

Website and Content © 1999-2024 SAYNOTO0870.COM. All Rights Reserved. (DE)
Written permission is required to duplicate any of the content within this site.

WARNING: This is an open forum, posts are NOT endorsed by SAYNOTO0870.COM,
please exercise due caution when acting on any info from here.


SAYNOTO0870.COM » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved.


Valid RSS Valid XHTML Valid CSS Powered by Perl Source Forge