Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
SAYNOTO0870.COM

<---- Back to main website

 
Home Help Search Login Register

Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print
Hansard - NTS review outcome? (Read 50,202 times)
PeDaSp
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 111
Re: Hansard - NTS review outcome?
Reply #45 - Aug 1st, 2005 at 7:48pm
 
What do you want NGM - me to come round and set you up with VoIP Grin

Just take a good look at www.voip-info.org and all well be revealed.

Quote:
The reality though seems to be that to get all my Dect and extension phones supported by Dect is a big hassle and a big cost in investing in new equipment


Nope. You can just buy a cheap ATA adaptor to set between your master DECT cradle and a ethernet socket on your router. This turns your whole DECT system to VoIP. Spend a bit more and a Supura ATA will give you POTS and VoIP on all your DECT phones.

Quote:
and although voipbuster and voipcheap may temporarily be free to a Pots line that will not be the case for very long.


True - but VoIP/VoIP calls are free - and POTS calls via VoIP are often just 1.5ppm or even less. They will get lower and lower. Or you can hook up with www.broadvoice.com and pay $20pm for unlimited calls to 21 countries

Quote:
And although I can buy a bluetooth wireless voip headset at Maplin for 60 quid so far as I can see I have to return to the computer screen each time to dial?  Or did I miss something obvious


For this you need your DECT solution above - or buy a WiFi handset. Soon these will be just £30-40.

Quote:
As for wifi being free everywhere away from home this isn't the real world.  Why would anyone give this service to customers for free when they have to invest in transmitter equipment and monthly broadband rental.


It's happening big time in the USA. Everywhere is starting to offer free WiFi as it pulls folks in: Starbucks; McDonalds; Airports; Petrol Stations; Campuses etc... Folks are starting to expect free WiFi just like they use the loo for free.

Quote:
All the roaming wifi services are currently extortionately expensive and their transmitte range is exceedingly limited.


That will be solved by WiFiMAX which is just around the corner. One transmitter can cover 25 square miles.

Quote:
Hopefully they may get cheaper gradually but data on GPRS still makes such obscene charges that it prevents the growth of the market.  Vodafone charges for 3g data are also obscene.  Their inclusive 3g data packages are void in Europe and they charge 12 quid a megabyte or something lunatic in another EU member country.  In other words the old roaming ripoff again.

The mobile phone companies have spent billions on their 3g licenses.  They operate in a totally uncompetitive market where uk customers cannot cross roam onto other operators networks.  So you really think Ofcom and the government will make them give all that up overnight and let Vodafone go bankrupt?  Thing again.  The market is so slow to develop that the imbeciles at Three still don't allow proper internet access using their 3g product over 2 years after their network was launched.  They only let people into a useless walled garden of Premier league goals.


WiFi VoIP has nothing to do with 3G etc... See my earlier post.

Quote:
If voip is "free" on your mobile eventually it will only be because you are paying a fixed monthly line rental of 50 quid a month.


WiFi VoIP is totally a function of the handset. So although Orange may want me to to use THEIR handset where I would be tied to their VoIP service only; I will be able to buy a WiFi VoIP/GSM handset and just stick the SIM card in. Or I will be able to download a hack to unlock the Orange handset (just like I do now). WiFi VoIP chipsets are becoming so cheap that they will be installed in all mobile phones - they are actually combined with the GSM chip.

Remember - WiFi VoIP calls are NOT made via the mobile phone providers network.

At some point one of the major mobile providers will bite the bullet and offer unrestricted WiFi VoIP access as it costs them nothing (it's just a function of the phone like a radio). Then all the others will follow suite. VoIP has lots of other features like presence (see which of your contacts is logged-on); Instant Messaging and Texting. All free, as it's just a few big servers in a room anywhere in the world.

Quote:
Outside towns Wifi is a non starter.


See comments above about WiFiMAX.

Quote:
The pace and manner of development on all this is going to be a lot different from that which you seem to expect.


It's happening so fast you would not believe it! All the manufactures are rushing to produce phones; and WiFiMAX is being trialed in the North of England as we speak. VoIP is exploding. BT have just committed £10 BILLION - yes BILLION pounds to start the first stage of moving their whole network over to IP based telecommunications. This is the largest project of it's kind in the whole world.

I made a VoIP call to by business partner in China and it was the clearest phone call I've EVER made. China's telecoms infrastructure is almost totally IP based as they've built it from the ground up. And there is a massive excess of fibre optic cabling linking the world left over from the mad dotcom boom.

...
Back to top
« Last Edit: Aug 1st, 2005 at 7:58pm by PeDaSp »  
 
IP Logged
 
PeDaSp
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 111
Re: Hansard - NTS review outcome?
Reply #46 - Aug 1st, 2005 at 7:58pm
 
...

Quote:
I prefer to live in the real world rather than in the visionary hypothetical world.


I already roam around London with my WiFi VoIP phone and make and receive calls the whole time. Folks in LA call me on my Beverly Hills POTS number and the phone rings in my local coffee shop which has free WiFi!

I'm in the process of setting-up and office for 80 media folk - and the whole thing will be WiFi VoIP and data. Not an ethernet cable in sight. Users can roam around the office - and even out into the street. They can have the same incoming numbers at home - or indeed anywhere in the world they are logged-on. The price? £15K. Cisco quoted my £150K (10 times as much) to stick in an old fashioned phone/data network.

My friend rang me from a Lufthansa flight over the Atlantic on his way to NY. He had paid the $30 to get in-flight WiFi - and then just plugged his headset into his PC and Skyped me! The cabin staff thought he was using a mobile phone and were shocked Smiley) He then handed the headset round and passengers starting calling their families.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
NonGeographicalMan
Ex Member


Re: Hansard - NTS review outcome?
Reply #47 - Aug 1st, 2005 at 9:07pm
 
Quote:
At some point one of the major mobile providers will bite the bullet and offer unrestricted WiFi VoIP access as it costs them nothing (it's just a function of the phone like a radio).


It in fact costs them the lost traffic on their mobile network!!!  You really think people who block free 0800 calls because they fear some customers will use third party call carriers are going to roll over and make it easy for you to route calls off their networks.  Absolutley not.  You can expect them to start locking the Sims down too so they will only work in one of their own phones and that phone will not have any Wifi functionality.  If it does have Wifi it will only connect with a proprietary Orange encoded wireless base station.  The majority of the public are stupid and lazy so they won't find a workaround.  I have a Liechtenstein Riiing SIM here that receives incoming calls free GSM calls anywhere in Europe and can be called for only 4p per minute from the UK.  But how many members of the public have bothered to get one or find out about them.

There has also just been an important uk court case where there was a successful prosecution of someone who logged into a Wifi access point that was not password protected in any way.  But he was seen to be stealing their bandwidth.  Make phone calls all round London over wifi.  Yeah I'm sure you do and keep dropping the call out every 10 seconds or so as you move.

WiMax is an uproven pipe dream at present.  Its great until the air waves are clogged.  My current Netgear DG834g adsl wireless router starts having reception problems when I turn the video sender on my television on.  What happens when there are tens of thousands of people clogging these same bands.  Why are BT spending a fortune on upgrading their fixed line network if WiMax is going to be so excellent and all reaching a solution?

Not everyone lives in Covent Garden.  If WiMax was as great as you maintained the mobile companies wouldn't still be building any new transmitters.  Instead they would all be planning their own funerals.

But have it your own way.  WiMax will of course I'm sure  be the answer to everything even though it hasn't even successfully passed testing yet. Roll Eyes
Back to top
« Last Edit: Aug 1st, 2005 at 9:08pm by N/A »  
 
IP Logged
 
idb
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1,499
Miami, Florida, United States
Gender: male
Re: Hansard - NTS review outcome?
Reply #48 - Aug 1st, 2005 at 9:35pm
 
Quote:
It in fact costs them the lost traffic on their mobile network!!!  You really think people who block free 0800 calls because they fear some customers will use third party call carriers are going to roll over and make it easy for you to route calls off their networks.  Absolutley not.  
I have never understood this (apart from the money aspect). I remember when I had a Vodafone contract when I lived in the UK. 0800 calls were chargeable, although they were allocated against inclusive minutes. Not so long ago, Vodafone wrote to me stating that 0800 would no longer be allocated against inclusive minutes, so not only would the calls not be free, but would be outside the bundled call time! Vodafone called this a 'simplification' if I remember correctly. I was able to cancel my contract early, although as it only had a month to go, it was an empty victory really. I remember writing to either Oftel or Ofcom, can't remember which, and, as we find today, it did nothing.

Here in the US, my cellphone provider does not care what I use the minutes for, and that is typical of many 'national' non-roaming plans. If I want to use the minutes to call a 1-800 calling card, it is not a problem. Over in the UK, the calling card companies are always trying to circumvent the numpties at Vodafone etc who block their numbers. I believe Orange is the most persistent! What a joke. Again, this is something that demands intervention from the regulatory authorities. Ofcom - clueless.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Aug 1st, 2005 at 9:36pm by idb »  

As from November 21, 2013, I no longer participate in the forum and am unable to receive private messages.
 
IP Logged
 
NonGeographicalMan
Ex Member


Re: Hansard - NTS review outcome?
Reply #49 - Aug 1st, 2005 at 10:03pm
 
Orange are only the most persistent because they are the only company to still allow free of charge (not against allocated minutes) calls to 0800 numbers for contract customers.  They actually deserve credit compared to the other companies who charge 30 to 50p per minute for mobile calls.

The whole uk market is set up for the benefit of the mobile companies and not to ensure the best prices for customers.  How else does one explain 20% of the uk land mass still not having mobile coverage and yet cross network roaming not being allowed to fill the gaps in these areas!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
dorf
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


I hate Qs on Premium NGNs

Posts: 575
UK
Gender: male
Re: Hansard - NTS review outcome?
Reply #50 - Aug 1st, 2005 at 11:40pm
 
I see Dave hasn't got his knife to this topic yet? Is that because he is too busy so far yet to notice, or does he accept the "minor" drift from topic?
Back to top
« Last Edit: Aug 1st, 2005 at 11:41pm by dorf »  

Ofcom are completely ineffectual
 
IP Logged
 
PeDaSp
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 111
Re: Hansard - NTS review outcome?
Reply #51 - Aug 2nd, 2005 at 12:26am
 
Oh dear NGM! You're starting to remind me of the old days when I ran an IT company and would rave to my SME customers about something called "email" and something call "the internet".

They all just laughed and thought my business card with my "email" and "web" address was cute!

Now I have my VoIP address on my biz card - and folks think that's cute!

Quote:
It in fact costs them the lost traffic on their mobile network!!!  You really think people who block free 0800 calls because they fear some customers will use third party call carriers are going to roll over and make it easy for you to route calls off their networks.  Absolutley not.  You can expect them to start locking the Sims down too so they will only work in one of their own phones and that phone will not have any Wifi functionality.  If it does have Wifi it will only connect with a proprietary Orange encoded wireless base station.


WiFi/WiMAX VoIP are a total sea change. This is not some little adjustment or altercation over 0800 numbers. As you can tell I'm plugged into the telcoms business and know what's happening. WiFi/WiMAX VoIP and VoIP in general is the biggest thing since email/www. Billions are being invested. Huge corporations (starting in Japan and USA) are installing massive WiFi VoIP networks with thousands of AP's.

Yes the mobile cos will be linked-in as the WiMAX stations can sit on their towers without interfering with their GSM. And yes WiMAX is a couple of years away at least. But INTEL are putting the circuitry for WiFi/WiMAX directly into their future generation of chips - so everything will become wired.

The producers of WiFi VoIP phones and WiFi hardware are NOT the mobile companies - so they don't have a monopoly.

Quote:
Make phone calls all round London over wifi.  Yeah I'm sure you do and keep dropping the call out every 10 seconds or so as you move.


True - but a huge percentage of mobile calls are made when stationary at desks; tables; pubs; sport stadia; airports; schools; campuses etc... Your handset can see if your calling party is "on-line" and route the call via VoIP.

Quote:
WiMax is an uproven pipe dream at present.  Its great until the air waves are clogged.  My current Netgear DG834g adsl wireless router starts having reception problems when I turn the video sender on my television on.  What happens when there are tens of thousands of people clogging these same bands.


Billions are being spent to solve these issues. Such problems in the WiFi VoIP area have already been solved by companies such as: www.merunetworks.com

Quote:
Why are BT spending a fortune on upgrading their fixed line network if WiMax is going to be so excellent and all reaching a solution?


Because they know the whole world is going IP for data and voice (and IP TV/Movies!) - and it's so much simpler/efficient. And the backbone will be needed to route all the traffic between the various hubs. I'm not saying the WiMAX will be a total solution; but it's ability to provide data and voice to a wide area is not to be underestimated.

Quote:
Not everyone lives in Covent Garden.  If WiMax was as great as you maintained the mobile companies wouldn't still be building any new transmitters.  Instead they would all be planning their own funerals.


Actually they are all shit-scared. I have friends who are telcoms consultants and they say the mobile companies are wetting themselves. They've already taken a huge hit with 3G and they're wondering what's around the corner.

Their hope is that POTS will disappear to replaced by WiFi VoIP and cellular. If they can get folks away from landlines and just have mobile handsets; then mobile calls via cellular might take a huge boost - even with many VoIP calls.

The change is being lead by the big corporates. Meru Networks are installing a huge WiFi/VoIP network for a Japanese gas corp. They'll use a WiFi/Cellular handset so that employees can have just one contact number. They use the WiFi in the corps buildings/network and then move over to Cellular outside. POTS goes down the drain. The mobile phone companies can hardly then demand that they use some sort of propriety WiFi VoIP system.

It's true that most of the public don't have hours spare to find the best deal; but they will snap up new technology pretty quickly these days. Look how quickly we swap out our old mobile phones - every year!

Quote:
But have it your own way.  WiMax will of course I'm sure  be the answer to everything even though it hasn't even successfully passed testing yet. Roll Eyes


OK - I'm not saying it's the second coming (that's next Wednesday in Regent's park Smiley ); but the combination of WiFi/WiMAX/VoIP/Multi Mode Cellular handsets is pretty strong and will create a mini revolution at least.

Huge hurdles had to be overcome to make VoIP practicable over what was a network designed for data packets - but it's now arrived.

Remember: VoIP is just email for voice! Your VoIP address is just a URL like your email address. Indeed with the right set-up your email and VoIP address can be the same.

Email is FREE (once you have the connection).
Ditto VoIP.
Almost EVERYBODY has an email address.
Almost EVERYBODY has a mobile phone - and soon they will ALL have WiFi VoIP wether you want it or not.
The combination of the above will drive the huge proliferation of WiFi/WiMAX /VoIP/Broadband.

Back to top
« Last Edit: Aug 2nd, 2005 at 12:27am by PeDaSp »  
 
IP Logged
 
idb
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1,499
Miami, Florida, United States
Gender: male
Re: Hansard - NTS review outcome?
Reply #52 - Aug 2nd, 2005 at 12:39am
 
Quote:
Actually they are all shit-scared. I have friends who are telcoms consultants and they say the mobile companies are wetting themselves. They've already taken a huge hit with 3G and they're wondering what's around the corner.

Indeed, and here in the US, it is becoming a political issue. Some city governments have started to provide wireless access to large metro areas, however some within congress (Republicans) are not happy about this. I wonder why!
Back to top
 

As from November 21, 2013, I no longer participate in the forum and am unable to receive private messages.
 
IP Logged
 
NonGeographicalMan
Ex Member


Re: Hansard - NTS review outcome?
Reply #53 - Aug 2nd, 2005 at 12:40am
 
Quote:
I see Dave hasn't got his knife to this topic yet? Is that because he is too busy so far yet to notice, or does he accept the "minor" drift from topic?


I assume Dave is on holiday Dorf.  I think DaveM has become a bit less active here too after he began to realise that not everyone appreciated his editorial style. Wink
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
NonGeographicalMan
Ex Member


Re: Hansard - NTS review outcome?
Reply #54 - Aug 2nd, 2005 at 12:51am
 
Quote:
Email is FREE (once you have the connection).
Ditto VoIP.
Almost EVERYBODY has an email address.
Almost EVERYBODY has a mobile phone - and soon they will ALL have WiFi VoIP wether you want it or not.
The combination of the above will drive the huge proliferation of WiFi/WiMAX /VoIP/Broadband.

There are a lot of hassles with Spam on email that arise due to the service being completely free.  A charge of 1 cent an email would make the problem go away.  This could be offset by a lower monthly service charge for the broadband connection.

The issues with free voip are going to be even worse.  Just look at what happens already with chargeable uk and international landline calls.  So we need a very small flat charge (i.e. 1 cent) per voip call to make the problem go away.  Or do you have a better solution?

And can you tell me who is going to provide directory enquiries for email and voip once POTS is dead.  That seems to be a hugely necessary service but no one is taking care of it.  But again it can't happen unless a charge for each email and voip message is introduced or we will all be saturated by endless spamming.  So how exactly is that little problem going to be tackled?

I can't see POTS dropping dead unless mobile networks drop mobile (as opposed to Wifi) call charges and rely exclusively on line rental instead.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mikeinnc
Full Member
***
Offline


Ofcom - quis custodiet
ipsos custodes?

Posts: 225
Perth Western Australia
Gender: male
Re: Hansard - NTS review outcome?
Reply #55 - Aug 2nd, 2005 at 8:23pm
 
I just received this article in an on-line magazine VON (Voice on the Net). I thought it was worth sharing, as it seems to confirm many of the issues that have been raised in this thread. Enjoy!

Flat rate VoIP over 3G
25 Jul 05  |  Bob Emmerson, European Editor

The new smartphones have Wi-Fi as well as cellular air interfaces, so VoIP calls can be made from hot spots and networked homes. Mobile operators buy lots of phones from the vendors and this was a development they tried to block. The vendors said the interface was only meant for data — they would say that wouldn't they — but when one manufacturer (Motorola) broke ranks the rest followed.

Solutions that select the optimum interface automatically are being marketed (see “Wireless Going On in Cannes”, June issue) and wireline operators get into the act via Wi-Fi access to the local loop. The wireless guys want you to dump your landline service in some markets, which has already happened in Scandinavia where tariffs are low, so this is another negative development from their blinkered perspective.

3G networks have an IP infrastructure but the air interface for voice traffic is circuit switched, which is ironic but VoIP has a relatively high overhead so yesterday's technology is more efficient. You can do VoIP but, I was told earlier this year, this de facto data communication would be more expensive than a regular cell call. That situation would change if operators offered ‘all the data you can eat' services for say $50 a month. Verizon did and Vodafone are going down that route in Germany, where tariffs are high. Their new offer is 1,000 minutes of local and national calls for Euro 20 ($24) a month.

This is good news for subscribers and you can see it as smart marketing, but what about that high overhead. If it was an issue earlier on why has it gone away? Why wasn't a flat rate service being marketed as part of 3G's belated rollout? That would have been really smart marketing. Why are they doing it now?

Operators, wireline and wireless, are scared. Skype was a gigantic wake-up call. Packetized voice needs four times more bandwidth than circuit-switched cellular so the techies don't like it, but 3G operators have bandwidth coming out of their ears so the marketing types decided to go with the flow. However, 3G allows operators to deliver voice services at around one-third of the 2G cost, so margins are high and they need to be in order to recoup some of the ludicrous, lemming-like ‘investments' made in air licenses. Moreover, while they expected margins to decline over time, they did not think that wireless VoIP would have a significant impact for a few years. Conclusion: maybe you should eat your own lunch before somebody takes it away.

Maybe. Those high margins are needed to support the implementation of IMS services, which are seen as the silver bullet that is going to make 3G profitable. And video is being hyped to the hilt because — surprise, surprise — this service eats bandwidth. Thus, on one hand revenues will decline and on the same hand a chunk of bandwidth is being used inefficiently. 

 
Bob Emmerson, VON European editor, is co-author of the book 21st Century Communications.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
NonGeographicalMan
Ex Member


Re: Hansard - NTS review outcome?
Reply #56 - Aug 2nd, 2005 at 8:41pm
 

Very interesting article.  Thanks for posting it.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
PeDaSp
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 111
Re: Hansard - NTS review outcome?
Reply #57 - Aug 3rd, 2005 at 12:10am
 
Yep - thanks mikeinnc. You learn something new every day!

So 3G can offer VoIP (sort-of) calls via their internet bandwidth connection? Weird eh? Why on earth would Vodaphone offer 1,000 mins local/national for $20pm via VoIP 3G This would just drain calls via regular cellular. Why not just offer the calls via regular cellular?

Even I'm getting confused now... Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print
(Moderators: CJT-80, bbb_uk, DaveM, Forum Admin, Dave)

Website and Content © 1999-2024 SAYNOTO0870.COM. All Rights Reserved.
Written permission is required to duplicate any of the content within this site.

WARNING: This is an open forum, posts are NOT endorsed by SAYNOTO0870.COM,
please exercise due caution when acting on any info from here.


SAYNOTO0870.COM » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved.


Valid RSS Valid XHTML Valid CSS Powered by Perl Source Forge