They really cannot help themselves, can they? It is a little off topic, but it shows the type of Corporate response we might expect.
The Australian Communications and Media Authority - which is roughly equivalent
to OFCOM in the UK - released a discussion paper in October 2004 reviewing
telecommunications regulation relevant to voice over Internet protocol (VoIP)
services. Its aim was to look at how well the current regulatory arrangements
deal with VoIP services and what adjustments in Australia - if any - are
required to accommodate this technique. Most of the major telcos replied -
including, of course, our dear scheming friends from BT.
BT is represented in Australia by BT Global Services, which is active in the
corporate sector among major companies who have an international presence.
Here is what was said in their submission about - yep, you guessed it - numbering issues.
Quote:"In general, BT believes that non geographic numbers are more suitable for VoIP
services than geographic numbers. Where a VoIP product offers trans-PSTN
functionality, non-geographic numbers should be assigned and implementation of
those numbering ranges by Other Licensed Operators should be encouraged. Such
policy will allow providers to offer products with more innovative features and
pricing that is more cost-based. Such numbers should also be used for converged
mobile and fixed services. BT does acknowledge that there may be complications
where suitable non-geographic numbers are not available, where there is a lack
of support for non-geographic numbers across interconnection interfaces, or
where allocation would adversely affect new entrants in terms of delay or
costs."
More innovative features and pricing that is more cost-based? Where have we heard that before.....
So there we have it in a nutshell. Not content with completely - and almost
single handedly - screwing up the UK numbering system; screwing the public for
every penny it can get; and lying through its corporate teeth, it now wants to
repeat the exercise in Australia as well!
What an arrogant bunch they are!! I am afraid this who we are really up against.
It is probably not the regulator. Ofcom have been entirely seduced by the smooth snake
oil treatment, rolled over and now have BT tickling their tummy!. In many cases,
it is the same with the companies who have been sold on NGNs. I wonder what
selling pitch was peddled to
them.....(if you want to see the full submission, it is at
http://www.acma.gov.au/ACMAINTER.65674:STANDARD:1460051868:pc=PC_8002)