Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
SAYNOTO0870.COM

<---- Back to main website

 
Home Help Search Login Register

Pages: 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 ... 26
Send Topic Print
OFCOM - FUTURE OF 0870 NUMBERS - CONSULTATION (Read 389,834 times)
NonGeographicalMan
Ex Member


Re: OFCOM - FUTURE OF 0870 NUMBERS - CONSULTATION
Reply #240 - Nov 15th, 2005 at 2:10pm
 
dorf wrote on Nov 15th, 2005 at 1:50pm:
Hi NGM,

You say "fortunately for them..". Who is them? I do not understand.

I do have a memorable password for my log-in. I cannot think what you can mean?!


I think "them" must be Daniel (admin), Dave and DaveM in this context.  As to passwords I thought you did have some difficulty with this matter in the past but that may have been under another forum user name? Wink  Perhaps you have now learnt the lesson on that and so have adopted a memorable password for dorf

Since we now have a Global Moderator concept in the forum it seems clear that the software must also support Section Moderators as well?  So my vote, based on considerable experience, would be to only make DaveM a moderator of the Geographical Requests and Cheap Call Providers sections whilst allowing Dave to be a Global Moderator.  It is just that when moderating in the more political forum section (Geographical Numbers Chat) DaveM often seems to find it hard to separate his own personal views from the independent and impartial judgement that a moderator is clearly required to demonstrate.  Whereas if you need someone who knows how to work the system to track a geographical number down then DaveM is clearly a veritable technical expert.

I hope this clarifies the situation.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Nov 15th, 2005 at 2:26pm by N/A »  
 
IP Logged
 
NonGeographicalMan
Ex Member


Re: OFCOM - FUTURE OF 0870 NUMBERS - CONSULTATION
Reply #241 - Nov 15th, 2005 at 2:21pm
 
dorf wrote on Nov 15th, 2005 at 1:59pm:
I have also noticed that the same individuals from time-to-time indulge in a practice of posting part of a specific instance of contribution as three or four sequential posts instead of one, so as to get a count of three or four instead of only one on their contribution record. This is a lesson which I will seek to learn immediately to cover the miles more quickly!


I don't know who you can mean here since I myself am frequently noted for the length of my contributions and also for my relatively complex arguments, although of course all of us post one liners at times.  Also with respect to making more than one response in sequence this appears legitimate when responding to two different posts from different individuals or even when responding to two different posts from the same individual with entirely different  subject matter (what is not legitimate is a load of posts in a short period all saying thinks like just "I Agree" and "A Good Point").  I must say I had no idea that it was so important to you to be near the top of the tree in terms of numbers of postings in the forum as this was never my goal at the outset and is merely a bi-product of my interest in this subject and having the time available to make the posts.  Also clearly some of our longest and most informed members like Tanllan have never targetted being judged by the number of their posts they make and have preferred instead to make just one or two well placed contributions a day.

I do know of a forum member who joined some months ago who was quite clearly targetting becoming the top forum poster given the brevity and frequency of the posts made.   However it appears that the individual concerned may latterly have found some other interest that has sidetracked them from this quest as in recent months their posting tally has fallen off most remarkably.  But you will note who it was who in a tongue in cheek manner started the thread to congratulate me on reaching 1000 posts in the forum. Wink Smiley

I believe some other forums have terms such as Guru and Forum Deity for those with the greatest number of posts but this is really all too childish and what is most important is the value of the arguments that one puts forward.  For instance Juby clearly does not believe in joining the race to be top of the posting league but his posts always count and are some of the most memorable in the forum.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Nov 15th, 2005 at 2:38pm by N/A »  
 
IP Logged
 
dorf
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


I hate Qs on Premium NGNs

Posts: 575
UK
Gender: male
Re: OFCOM - FUTURE OF 0870 NUMBERS - CONSULTATION
Reply #242 - Nov 15th, 2005 at 2:31pm
 
Come-come NGM. Are you seriously suggesting that I would have more than one forum user name currently in use? How on earth could that be and why would it be likely? I think we must separate fantasy from fact surely?

You aren't starting to stalk me like someone else did you, or trying to expose me are you? Shame on you! Smiley 

I do admit however, that 3 previous user names which I used on this forum I had to abandon, because my auto log-in became corrupted in all 3 cases successively and I had not noted the passwords. The e-mail addresses which I had registered with became defunct because I changed my isps. I was therefore unable to retrieve my password on each occasion due to this via the forum auto function. However, I paid the price dearly, since I ALSO LOST THE COUNT OF ALL MY PREVIOUS POSTINGS towards my membership grade! So if it had not been for that I would at the moment be a "Supreme Member" up there with you!  Cry

So don't chastise me too greatly for my oversight. I have indeed already paid a great price for it. The punishment has indeed made me repentant and I now do not forget my password. Mind you it was a near thing when I got ejected!  Sad
Back to top
« Last Edit: Nov 15th, 2005 at 7:05pm by dorf »  

Ofcom are completely ineffectual
 
IP Logged
 
NonGeographicalMan
Ex Member


Re: OFCOM - FUTURE OF 0870 NUMBERS - CONSULTATION
Reply #243 - Nov 15th, 2005 at 2:49pm
 
Dorf I feel your last post would possibly be enhanced in tone by the use of a number of our exciting new forum Smilies.  Smiley

As to your other forum names that you had to abandon it is always a mistake to ask an ISP to close one's account completely if one can avoid doing so without paying.  In fact apart from AOL and Compuserve and BT most ISPs let you go on collecting mail on your old ISP account by just downgrading to pay as you go dialup as I did with Plusnet.  AOL and Compurserve (two sides of the same Bertelsman coin) have always had an evil policy of using propietary mail systems and refuisng to let you go on collecting mail unless you continue to pay them.  But Freeserve/Wanadoo merely require that you reactivate the account every 3 months if you continue to collect mail through your broadband connection with another provider.  But they do not wipe out your mail when your account with them becomes temporarily dormant due to not having collected mail on one of their dialup or broadband connections.

As to your other forum identies I do note that three letters in your own current user name may perhaps also have featured in some of those other accounts on a possibly somewhat repetitious basis. Wink

The difference between me and andy9 though is that I am a friendly poster despite perhaps occasionally pulling your leg.  Whereas andy9's motivations stem from a poison pen of the most acidic kind.  If of course you start calling me Cllr instead of NGM the fact is that I won't really mind.  But to give more than an actual clue to those other forum members who care and to actually name names would naturally be going too far.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Nov 15th, 2005 at 2:49pm by N/A »  
 
IP Logged
 
dorf
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


I hate Qs on Premium NGNs

Posts: 575
UK
Gender: male
Re: OFCOM - FUTURE OF 0870 NUMBERS - CONSULTATION
Reply #244 - Nov 15th, 2005 at 3:14pm
 
NGM,

I was not suggesting that it was of any concern to me to make posts so to get to the top level of this or any forum. It certainly is not. However what is of a concern to me is when rules are suddenly changed and one is precipitously with no warning nor any explanation downgraded, as if one's previous contributions were no longer so important. So when you state "I must say I had no idea that it was so important to you to be near the top of the tree in terms of numbers of postings in the forum as this ...." that is not so and the idea which you had was slightly askew to the truth, from my point of view.

So my point is that the level of achieving the level of what you previously referred to as the "glass-ceiling" is not of any importance; after all there is no reward nor any physical recognition of any sort for it. However, to be suddenly downgraded for no stated reason without prior warning is one thing only - a snub, whichever way you look at. Anyone with even a modicum of intelligence will interpret it as such if it is perpetrated on them.

To attempt to illustrate the point - many years ago, when I was promoted into my first management role I subsequently experienced a snub. After about 6 months the previous encumbent of the role which I then held decided that he wanted to return to the company. The company re-employed him, did not inform me and then slily gradually began to pass my responsibilities one by one back to him. I left shortly afterwards and found myself a better job!

In my opinion, if it was decided to increase the number of postings required as the threshold for each particular level of membership, which was a good idea since many of them were too low, members should have kept their previous status, regardless of whether or not they had met the newly imposed thresholds. It is that which concerns me - not reaching any particular coined or designated level.  Shocked
Back to top
« Last Edit: Nov 15th, 2005 at 7:03pm by dorf »  

Ofcom are completely ineffectual
 
IP Logged
 
dorf
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


I hate Qs on Premium NGNs

Posts: 575
UK
Gender: male
Re: OFCOM - FUTURE OF 0870 NUMBERS - CONSULTATION
Reply #245 - Nov 15th, 2005 at 3:44pm
 
Sorry we have gone wildly off topic here. It was all the Clr's fault!  Cheesy

So the future of 0870 numbers - if, as has been indicated earlier before we went off topic, the real culprit is BT and to a lesser extent other telcos, then what can we do to address the problem effectively? Ofcom are likely to go along with what they demand, just as they always have. So do we have to face the fact that there is, as the Clr has suggested I seem to recall, likely to be a last minute influx of fake responses from cronies, associates and "volunteered" employees of telcos, stating how they are happy with what Ofcom propose and what good fellows they are.

Surely we need to be objective and now consider what, when the inevitable occurs, we can do next? Would it be more effective to target the telcos, MPs and MEPs and ignore Ofcom? (Most of all those MPs who have already expressed their objections to the scams.)
Back to top
 

Ofcom are completely ineffectual
 
IP Logged
 
NonGeographicalMan
Ex Member


Re: OFCOM - FUTURE OF 0870 NUMBERS - CONSULTATION
Reply #246 - Nov 15th, 2005 at 3:50pm
 
dorf wrote on Nov 15th, 2005 at 3:14pm:
In my opinion, if it was decided to increase the number of postings required as the threshold for each particular level of membership, which was a good idea since many of them were too low, members should have kept their previous status, regardless of whether or not they had met the newly imposed thresholds. It is that which concerns me - not reaching any particular coined or designated level.  Shocked


Dorf,

I do not think most forum software, especially the Freeware YaBB forum software, is clever enough to do what you would like it to.  Namely impose a new hurdle to pass to graduate to the next level for all forum members who have not yet got there whilst still allowing those who had got there under the old targets to retain their position.  Also if one takes an analogous but reverse situation such as as New Labour moving the goalposts so 50% of GCSE and A level students get an A it is true they do not then uprate my old C grades at O level to the A grades they would now undoubtedly be worth if they were to review the matter retrospectively.  But in my opinion this would in fact be a fairer situation were it to happen as it would also if my 1985 university degree grade was increased from a borderline 2:2 (about 1 mark short of 2:1) to the high 2:1 it would now be worth in modern currency.

Clearly what has happened here is that Daniel has changed the name of the top class of ordinary forum membership from Superior Member to Supreme Member and also changed the number of posts required.  But perhaps Daniel didn't even do this and it was in fact Carsten, Spike and co over at www.yabbforum.com who have made these changes in YaBB v2.1  And perhaps Daniel has not chosen to or is in fact unable to change where the bar has now been set to qualify for these various classes of membership.

Assuming that there may not be an option to add extra classes of membership then as the posts total grows the only option is to raise the level of posts required before a particular membership level is granted.  Now of course in a school exam scenario you would still have the old qualification in your file but in this web environment, which does not repspect history or yesteryear, if a new pass level is required then we must all fall into line with it.

If you do not like it I suggest you make an On Topic post on the matter over in Site Related as I fear that if we continue the discussion here it will not be long before Dave and/or DaveM appear in this thread blowing their moderator's whistle and demanding that we continue this discussion elsewhere and not in the Future of 0870 thead.

Being a Supreme Member I can honestly say it is no different a feeling from being a Superior Member or even a Senior Member was.  The only matter which I do probably derive some small satisfaction from is having the most posts in the forum.  But as I said before I do hope that other forum members would not hope to takeover that mantle by cheating with short posts and would only get there because they have even more than I to say than I do about all matters related to legitimate discussion in this web forum.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Nov 15th, 2005 at 3:52pm by N/A »  
 
IP Logged
 
NonGeographicalMan
Ex Member


Re: OFCOM - FUTURE OF 0870 NUMBERS - CONSULTATION
Reply #247 - Nov 15th, 2005 at 3:54pm
 
dorf wrote on Nov 15th, 2005 at 3:44pm:
Surely we need to be objective and now consider what, when the inevitable occurs, we can do next? Would it be more effective to target the telcos, MPs and MEPs and ignore Ofcom? (Most of all those MPs who have already expressed their objections to the scams.)


I concur with the learned holder of a PhD in respect of his latest opinions.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Nov 15th, 2005 at 3:55pm by N/A »  
 
IP Logged
 
dorf
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


I hate Qs on Premium NGNs

Posts: 575
UK
Gender: male
Re: OFCOM - FUTURE OF 0870 NUMBERS - CONSULTATION
Reply #248 - Nov 15th, 2005 at 6:58pm
 
I also concur with the Clr with respect to the lowering of educational standards and thresholds which has occured. I can give him an even better example: I took a DMS when was at a standard which required either 3 years part time or one complete year full time. They have now reduced the same qualification to 1 year part time and 4 months full time and abolished the two stage examination hurdle which previously existed, so that there are now no examinations at all. They then claim that standards have not been lowered!

However, I still do not feel that the issue of downgrading on this forum is the same as that with educational standards.

Nevertheless even though the Clr may concur with my point about future strategy for fighting the NGN scams, my post was also initially a question:  " Surely we need to be objective and now consider what, when the inevitable occurs, we can do next?"

So what suggestions are there for what we can do next, when as sadly anticipated Ofcom will again fail to perform their principal duty, being to protect the Citizen Consumer, and will again cave in to the requirements of the telcos, ensuring that all the scams can continue in a slightly different but unfettered form, to the continued detrement of the Citizen Consumer?
Back to top
« Last Edit: Nov 15th, 2005 at 7:01pm by dorf »  

Ofcom are completely ineffectual
 
IP Logged
 
NonGeographicalMan
Ex Member


Re: OFCOM - FUTURE OF 0870 NUMBERS - CONSULTATION
Reply #249 - Nov 15th, 2005 at 7:38pm
 
Well Mr Matt Peacock their Communications Director suggests that Ofcom will be most likely to listen to us and do something if we only say nice things to Ofcom and are friendly to them but I regret to say that he and I are not at all of like minds with regard to the said suggestion.

My own suggestion is that if Ofcom do not listen to us that more aggressive means of campaigning must be engaged that involve making formal complaints to outside bodies and Parliament about the failure of Ofcom to fulfil its duties to uk citizens and consumers under the Communications Act 2003.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
bbb_uk
Global Moderator
*****
Offline



Posts: 2,041
Re: OFCOM - FUTURE OF 0870 NUMBERS - CONSULTATION
Reply #250 - Nov 15th, 2005 at 8:09pm
 
Quote:
Well Mr Matt Peacock their Communications Director suggests that Ofcom will be most likely to listen to us and do something if we only say nice things to Ofcom and are friendly to them
If they started listening to us consumers more and actually started doing something about it rather than have consultation after consultation and only coming up with very, very short term answers to our concerns then we would have nicer words to say to them
Smiley
Back to top
« Last Edit: Nov 15th, 2005 at 8:10pm by bbb_uk »  
 
IP Logged
 
dorf
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


I hate Qs on Premium NGNs

Posts: 575
UK
Gender: male
Re: OFCOM - FUTURE OF 0870 NUMBERS - CONSULTATION
Reply #251 - Nov 15th, 2005 at 9:18pm
 
Here, here bbb_uk, they seem to think that having consultation after consultation is the best way now to prevaricate and procrastinate further. Most of us can see through this smoke screen though, and some of us begin to see that responding to their continuous consultations perhaps plays into their hands and supports their position of parrying and delay. It will probably never convince them to change their position of doing the opposite of their statutory duty no matter how long we continued to respond to their successive consultations. Particularly if they have now stooped to resorting to intiating and encouraging fraudulent responses giving the opposite views of the only real citizen consumer responses which they receive!

So perhaps if these latest consultations produce the results which the most realistic of us expect (in our pessimism) we must in future ignore Ofcom and concentrate our efforts on exposing their failure to exercise their statutory duties and direct our salvos at those responsible for censuring and able to censure Ofcom.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Nov 15th, 2005 at 11:56pm by dorf »  

Ofcom are completely ineffectual
 
IP Logged
 
bbb_uk
Global Moderator
*****
Offline



Posts: 2,041
Re: OFCOM - FUTURE OF 0870 NUMBERS - CONSULTATION
Reply #252 - Nov 17th, 2005 at 7:32pm
 
Can I remind those that haven't already sent in their responses to ask why the ASA guidelines on the issue of 0845/0870 description and not remaining silent on the call cost only applies to non-broadcast adverts and not TV (broadcast) adverts?

This doesn't make sense why guidelines that Ofcom have said they are working with ASA/CAP with should be only adopted by ASA's non-broadcast area and not the TV (broadcast) area.  A TV advert has a much wider coverage than a non-broadcast advert like magazine or paper so if anything it should apply to them more than the non-broadcast side of the ASA.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Nov 17th, 2005 at 7:34pm by bbb_uk »  
 
IP Logged
 
cricketer
Newbie
*
Offline



Posts: 23
Re: OFCOM - FUTURE OF 0870 NUMBERS - CONSULTATION
Reply #253 - Nov 19th, 2005 at 6:10pm
 
Can I just ask three simple questions please - sorry to get back to the point everyone!

I want to send a simple complaining email to every relevant person in OFCOM.

Question 1 - who do I send it to?  A full list of email addresses would be great.

Question 2 - What are all the relevant questions and what are the preferred answers?  I shall obviously put the answers in my own language, but the arguments would be nice.

Question 3 - There seem to be two places (consultation papers).  Does the same answer go to both destinations?  If not, what are the preferred responses to each one.

Once I have this I shall send the complaining email(s) and also show how, and what to do, to as many people as I can.

This will ensure that more people can unravel this complicated issue.

P.S. I have just read this thread from page 1 to 17 to find the simple answer to my questions, and can't, but maybe I am not looking in the right place?  Shocked
Back to top
 

Employ TEENAGERS now! &&Get them whilst they know so much!
 
IP Logged
 
bbb_uk
Global Moderator
*****
Offline



Posts: 2,041
Re: OFCOM - FUTURE OF 0870 NUMBERS - CONSULTATION
Reply #254 - Nov 19th, 2005 at 6:37pm
 
Cricketer,

You can read the brief key points and/or summary of the 'NTS - A Way Forward' Consultation here, and the 'Providing consumers with improved information about Number Translation Services (NTS) and Premium Rate Services (PRS)' Consultation here.

Both links above should provide you with details you require a response questionnaire & coversheet and also the email address.

There is no preferred answers because ofcom may not treat the response seriously because they'll know it's just been copied from this site as they (ofcom) do read/monitor this site.  Basically though, if you are unhappy at paying more than geographical rates for these numbers and in fact in most cases earning the company (and government department in some cases) you are calling a revenue of upto 4p/min from the call, then I'm sure you could put in your own words whether you are happy with this.

I plan on letting ofcom know that I'm not happy with this and want all non-geographical numbers to lose their revenue sharing and any company that does still want to use these "stealth" premium rate numbers should move over to 09x numbers where us consumers get clearer pricing, call queuing is prohibited so you are not paying a fortune to be kept on hold for over 20+ minutes before finally getting to speak to a human being, etc.

If you have any further questions then post here and we'll help you any way we can.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Nov 19th, 2005 at 6:38pm by bbb_uk »  
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 ... 26
Send Topic Print
(Moderators: Forum Admin, CJT-80, bbb_uk, DaveM, Dave)

Website and Content © 1999-2024 SAYNOTO0870.COM. All Rights Reserved. (DE)
Written permission is required to duplicate any of the content within this site.

WARNING: This is an open forum, posts are NOT endorsed by SAYNOTO0870.COM,
please exercise due caution when acting on any info from here.


SAYNOTO0870.COM » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved.


Valid RSS Valid XHTML Valid CSS Powered by Perl Source Forge