Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
SAYNOTO0870.COM

<---- Back to main website

 
Home Help Search Login Register

Pages: 1 2 3 4
Send Topic Print
Watch Me Admit I'm Wrong (Read 41,408 times)
Mr_Asaboa
Newbie
*
Offline



Posts: 28
Watch Me Admit I'm Wrong
Oct 15th, 2005 at 1:45am
 
Contempt is what I have for most of the people on this site. I'll probably get banned for this, but I will attempt to put my point across in a well thought out manner. For the past day since stumbling across this site I have been attempting to play Devil's Advocate (admitedly very badly).

I don't work for Ofcom, or anyone like that, I'm just an ordinary Joe Blow who happens to dislike people who whinge and have no sense of proportion.

I have been disgusted by some of things people have written on here. I'll list some examples:

1) A major earthquake occurs. People are dying, families are devestated. Think about the actual real-life effects of this. Human tragedy of the highest order. And you people still complain because you have to pay a few more pence a minute in order to donate. Pathetic.

2) Children in Need. I really hope I don't have to go into why this charity does such an important job, please I hope you guys can work it out. And still you people whinge about the numbers. Pathetic.

3) July 7th. 56 people were killed and hundreds more maimed in dispicable attacks on London. And still you say things like if it was Ofcom people wouldn't have cared. Now I don't know nyone at Ofcom, but they are regular people like you and me. People with families. You should be ashamed.

4) Somebody complaining because Watchdog don't have a freepost address and have the audacity to charge  for calls!! I mean FFS, if you're that bothered about whinging then pay the fecking postage fee, or pay the 40p it would cost you to make the call. Don't expect organisations to pay so that you can whinge about your pedantry complaints for free.

Honestly, my God. I'm almost (but not quite) speechless. I will be honest and say I know very little about Ofcom, Oftel or any of the other bits and bobs (as NGM to his credit pointed out). I do know about the numbers, but I also have something I don't think you guys have: perspective.

Is it really worth saying some of the disgraceful things you lot have been saying? Honestly, no.

So there, I've said my piece. Ban me if you wish, or try to argue against me. However much I agree with the underlying principle of what you're doing I can't help but feel sad at the pedantry of it all.

Now in all honesty I agree with some of what you guys are saying. But honestly, you have
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 16th, 2005 at 5:03pm by Mr_Asaboa »  
 
IP Logged
 
firestop
Full Member
***
Offline


Do unto others, before
they get a chance to
do....

Posts: 164
Re: Contempt...
Reply #1 - Oct 15th, 2005 at 8:06am
 
I am sad that you have contempt for me - such a strong emotion when you know nothing about me, or what I do or what I give to whom.  I can hold my head up when my day of reckoning comes.

My reason for objecting to 0870 so strongly is simply because I hate to see 'freeloaders' making advantage from these calls - especially when human tragedies occur.  If you cannot accept this then you would be advised not to visit this site, which has a very clear title!

To give to charities is commendable and I'm sure I speak for most site contributors when I say we give as much as anyone else, but I won't give by phoning 0870.

A list of organisations was on the TV screen last night and only the DEC had an 0870!!  So my cash goes through the alternatives.

So, MR A, you are not held in contempt by me, life is too short for such overblown predjudices against persons unknown.  Have a good life.


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
PeDaSp
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 111
Re: Contempt...
Reply #2 - Oct 15th, 2005 at 12:07pm
 
This guy is a classic TROLL.

I suggest we exercise our democratic right to not reply to his  postings!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mc661
Senior Member
****
Offline


Habitual FOI requester.

Posts: 432
West-Norfolk
Gender: male
Re: Contempt...
Reply #3 - Oct 15th, 2005 at 12:18pm
 
wow you have contempt for me. Im so Honoured you have time to have feelings like that for me. Im also an "ordinary Joe Blow".

Now I dont have to explain myself to you... but as for July 7th, people from abroad couldnt ring those 0870's.
"regular people like you and me" yep just people being paid 6 figure salaries and who are ex teclo anyway.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
juby
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 203
Gloucestershire
Gender: male
Re: Contempt...
Reply #4 - Oct 15th, 2005 at 12:42pm
 
Quote:
I suggest we exercise our democratic right to not reply to his  postings!


Agree,

juby
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Shiggaddi
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 411
Saltash, Cornwall
Gender: male
Re: Contempt...
Reply #5 - Oct 15th, 2005 at 2:05pm
 
Somebody complaining because Watchdog don't have a freepost address and have the audacity to charge  for calls!! I mean FFS, if you're that bothered about whinging then pay the fecking postage fee, or pay the 40p it would cost you to make the call. Don't expect organisations to pay so that you can whinge about your pedantry complaints for free.



I recently had bad service from NTL, and if it wasn't for this site, I would have had to pay 0870 rates for holding on for half an hour.  Instead I called their freephone number.

Why should we have to pay to complain.  I would much rather have had internet access with no problems, but instead I had a message saying that the number cannot be recognised.

However NTL's attitude was that I should be paying 25p per minute to report this to technical support.  So next time you have a problem with bad service, if goods you order don't arrive, if your ISP won't let you connect to the net, if your brand new cooker or washing machine breaks down, I take it you're more than happy to call a premium rate number to make your complaint, and of course be left on hold whilst waiting for the call to be answered.

Or maybe you'd prefer not to whinge, and upset these lovely companies who are so worthy of our hard earned cash, and to show your appreciation, let's order some more goods from these companies, and if they don't arrive, we'll reward them with our custom again!!

Alternatively, if you send some money to my paypal account, I will send you a mystery gift, and if it doesn't arrive, then I take it you won't whinge, but if you do want to whinge, I'm happy to provide an 090 number for you to do so!!
Back to top
 

I realy hait itt wen peeple canot spel proply. Itt getts onn mye nervs sew mutch annd streses mee owt. Knot onley iz itt vary bade speling butt allso bade gramer.
 
IP Logged
 
Keith
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 378
Surrey
Gender: male
Re: Contempt...
Reply #6 - Oct 15th, 2005 at 3:52pm
 
Quote:
...3) July 7th. 56 people were killed and hundreds more maimed in dispicable attacks on London. And still you say things like if it was Ofcom people wouldn't have cared. Now I don't know nyone at Ofcom, but they are regular people like you and me. People with families. You should be ashamed.



I joined this site after the London Bombing because I was so outraged that an 0870 number was used for the helpline. I was angry that people who were desperate to know what had happened to relatives were being exploited, that people calling from abroad could not use the number and that people calling from pay as you go mobiles would run out of credits very quickly and before they could get through and be sick with worry.

I complained to OFCOM. It was a complete waste of time. I was told it was not their problem and to call the Home Office and that there was nothing they could do. When asked I was alos told that other people had phoned in to complain, although interestingly later we found out this tolta was unbelieveably only 5 I believe. I also found out that my call was almost certainly not registered as a complaint because I hadn't requested  it to be so and I wasn't asked if I wanted it to be so. I would have thought that that my outrage on the call would have made it obvious and like most I would not have known that I  needed to give some 'secret code' to make it obvious - hence the fantastic low total of 5 I presume.

Low and behold a few days later when the sh*t hits the fan' OFCOM take credit for raising this issue with the authorities.

A rather different message than what they put out a few days before when any idiot could see it was an immoral thing to be doing.

I'm sure individually OFCOM people cared, but I would have liked to see them being a hell of a lot more proactive. Although I'm sure that nobody actually thought 'Lets use an 0870 to make money of a tradegy' the crass incompetence and lack of immediate action on this was appalling.

I work from home and saw the number displayed on the TV screen very early on in the tradegy. I registered for this site immediately. I was however beaten to my outrage by many others. Why weren't OFCOM for whom this is their business still not on the ball even days later.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
bbb_uk
Global Moderator
*****
Offline



Posts: 2,041
Re: Contempt...
Reply #7 - Oct 15th, 2005 at 3:54pm
 
I like to think of myself as having an open mind.

Now I, like everyone else, agree that the london bombing was terrible but why should the government, C&W and the mobile companies that charged upto 40ppm make a profit from such tragedy?  And they must have done.  In my opinion, no one should have profited from this tragedy whatsoever.

Due to forum members on this site (and maybe others) the government announced they would use a freephone and a geographical god forbid it should be needed again.  Now I personally don't expect the government to have to fund the 0800 number as this would actually cost the government money which in turn means more tax for us so a geographical is all that I was expecting but the use of an expensive 0870 number was not needed/necessary.

C&W who supplied the number for the london bombing offered cheaper alternatives first but the government chose the 0870 instead.  Why when it didn't need to?

I believe it also shows the lack of knowledge that the government has because as soon as they were aware of the high costs involved they released a geographical number.

And only after it was aware of the excessive call charges did MP Hazel Blears, after investigating it, asked the networks if they would kindly donate the profit they made from those calls for which I believe they did.

My problem is I hate to see people being ripped off and being unaware of it.

Do you watch rogue traders, watchdog, etc?  Specifically those companies that go into houses and claim things are broke when they're not and purposely taking longer than necessary just to rip off people.  They do this because most joe public are unaware.

A similar thing exists about NGN's (especially 087x).  Most people are not aware of the costs involved (ofcom admit this) and this is likely because they are still described as local or national rate which obviously they not.  Now some companies using them are purposely using them to gain revenue without the customer knowing about it.

As mentioned on another thread, Ofcom have been aware of this for ages and their last consultation confirmed the dislike of the public because they had over 100 respondents and took over 9months for a result which turned out to be another consultation.  Basically it is being dragged on and on and on.

Not to go too much off-topic I can see where Ofcom are coming from on some of their points and I don't personally expect them to immediately announce that revenue sharing will end.  I believe this is unfair and for those companies that want to continue to ripping us off then a time scale is appropriate.  I think 1 year is over the top and would say about 6months is fair to allow all those companies time to consider what they want to do and make the necessary amendments like letterheads, business cards, etc.

Now going back on-topic, look at the following scenario:-

You have 2 companies that are in direct competition with each other.  Both operate tel support but one operates an 0870 that unfortunately is generally known as national rate and the other one operates a 09x number but this 09x number is charged at exactly the same rates as that of the 0870.

Which one is going to get more business?  Obviously the 0870 company because people aren't aware of the costs involved in ringing and are definitely not aware that the company they are calling is actually gaining revenue from the call (ofcom admit this).  Whereas most people are aware that an 09x number is premium rate.

Now if 0870 was described as premium rate same as this 09x number then people would be aware that they are paying over the odds for the call and that the company gets a cut of the call charge in return (as happens now).

There is no difference between either the 0870 or the 09x except certain 09x numbers cost more.  The problem is that most consumers are unaware of the real costs involved in these NGN's.

Another example is AOL's decision to use an 0870 number.  AOL aren't cheap compared  to some of the other ISPs and AOL must get more money that most other ISPs simply because their 'content' has adverts all over it.  I know someone who has uses AOL and these adverts are all plastered all over the place when you log-on.

Why didn't AOL use a 09x number that costs the same amount as the 0870?

Same reasons as above and that is everyone would know that 09x is a premium rate number and avoid them whereas using the 0870 number then most people aren't aware of the costs involved and more importingly that AOL gain revenue from the calls they receive.

In fact if I had no choice but to call AOL on their 09x number that costs the same as a 0870 or their 0870 then it would actually be cheaper for us to call the 09x simply because call charging whilst in a queue are not allowed therefore holding for 30mins on an 09x number then I wouldn't get charged until they answered and I spoke with a human being.  Completely different for 0870 and AOL would actually get more money using an 0870 due to the lack of ofcom to admit that they are premium rate numbers albeit not as high as some of the 09x numbers.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 15th, 2005 at 3:59pm by bbb_uk »  
 
IP Logged
 
Keith
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 378
Surrey
Gender: male
Re: Contempt...
Reply #8 - Oct 15th, 2005 at 6:21pm
 


bbb_uk. What can I say other than I agree with every single word.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
NonGeographicalMan
Ex Member


Re: Contempt...
Reply #9 - Oct 15th, 2005 at 10:39pm
 
I still stick to my original theory that Mr Asaboa is a senior employee of Ofcom, even though he now attempts to cover his tracks by pretending he is not.

The attitude that we are over excited about something that costs only a few pence per minute (when these calls are in fact worth £1.5 billion per year and constitute 25% of all uk calls by value) and is trivial is one I have persistently encountered from certain senior ex telco Ofcom and especially Oftel senior personnel.  It is also to be found throughout their consultation documents.

Mr Asaboa says he simply stumbled across this site but he then went out of his way to attack the integrity and impartiality of several active forum contributors.  He spends long hours studying all the posts.  Comeon pull the other one.  This person is either a senior call centre scamming person, a telco person or an Ofcom person.  And some of the attitudes expressed are a virtual dead ringer for the Mr Angry face of a senior Ofcom employee who tries to play Mr Niceguy until he realises he is not going to ever ensnare you in the Ofcom way of thinking. The vitriolic critcism of us for daring to talk about 0870 when there has been a major earthquake is exactly how that person thinks.  I have already had that person under his own name suggesting that we have a disproportionate interest in what is merely a telecoms tariff and that everything going on in Iraq etc is far more important.

Now that Mr Asaboa (obviously some clever intellectual play name worthy of a Times crossword man and standing for something else when decoded) has been rumbled he strangely seems to have lost his enthusiasm for posting any further.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Shiggaddi
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 411
Saltash, Cornwall
Gender: male
Re: Contempt...
Reply #10 - Oct 15th, 2005 at 11:00pm
 
Now that Mr Asaboa (obviously some clever intellectual play name worthy of a Times crossword man and standing for something else when decoded) has been rumbled he strangely seems to have lost his enthusiasm for posting any further.


He's probably not in his office at the moment.  Whereas genuine contributors to this site are unpaid, and post on the net in our spare time, when not working, Mr Asaboa is carrying out his visits to this site as part of his job, and therefore like any working person is enjoying his weekend break, and probably doesn't want to think about work until Monday morning.
Back to top
 

I realy hait itt wen peeple canot spel proply. Itt getts onn mye nervs sew mutch annd streses mee owt. Knot onley iz itt vary bade speling butt allso bade gramer.
 
IP Logged
 
NonGeographicalMan
Ex Member


Re: Contempt...
Reply #11 - Oct 15th, 2005 at 11:10pm
 
Quote:
He's probably not in his office at the moment.  Whereas genuine contributors to this site are unpaid, and post on the net in our spare time, when not working, Mr Asaboa is carrying out his visits to this site as part of his job, and therefore like any working person is enjoying his weekend break, and probably doesn't want to think about work until Monday morning.


Good point Shiggaddi.  I think you have hit the nail on the head.

Even more reason to believe Mr Asaboa works at senior level for Ofcom, a telco or a major uk call centre.  He did seem strangely angry and upset that we spend so much time pursuing an issue which he still wants us to see as being only a few pence per minute extra on each call instead of a multi billion pound ripoff industry.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 15th, 2005 at 11:11pm by N/A »  
 
IP Logged
 
dorf
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


I hate Qs on Premium NGNs

Posts: 575
UK
Gender: male
Re: Contempt...
Reply #12 - Oct 15th, 2005 at 11:46pm
 
Yes NGM I think you must be correct. In reality, if "Mr. Asaboa" does not think that NGNs scams are anything we should be complaining about and that the regulator is doing a good job, then what is he doing on this forum at all?

He clearly would not want to use saynoto0870 to find an alternative geographic number for any NGN; according to his stated viewpoint he clearly would pay the extortion rate on an NGN call and feel that was great. He clearly does not want to join the campaign against NGN scams. So he has no reason to be on this web site at all  -  unless ...... he is a spy. So I think NGM you must be correct, and he clearly must think we are totally dumb if we cannot see through his motivation!
Back to top
 

Ofcom are completely ineffectual
 
IP Logged
 
Mr_Asaboa
Newbie
*
Offline



Posts: 28
Re: Contempt...
Reply #13 - Oct 16th, 2005 at 12:27am
 
Quote:
I still stick to my original theory that Mr Asaboa is a senior employee of Ofcom, even though he now attempts to cover his tracks by pretending he is not.

The attitude that we are over excited about something that costs only a few pence per minute (when these calls are in fact worth £1.5 billion per year and constitute 25% of all uk calls by value) and is trivial is one I have persistently encountered from certain senior ex telco Ofcom and especially Oftel senior personnel.  It is also to be found throughout their consultation documents.

Mr Asaboa says he simply stumbled across this site but he then went out of his way to attack the integrity and impartiality of several active forum contributors.  He spends long hours studying all the posts.  Comeon pull the other one.  This person is either a senior call centre scamming person, a telco person or an Ofcom person.  And some of the attitudes expressed are a virtual dead ringer for the Mr Angry face of a senior Ofcom employee who tries to play Mr Niceguy until he realises he is not going to ever ensnare you in the Ofcom way of thinking. The vitriolic critcism of us for daring to talk about 0870 when there has been a major earthquake is exactly how that person thinks.  I have already had that person under his own name suggesting that we have a disproportionate interest in what is merely a telecoms tariff and that everything going on in Iraq etc is far more important.

Now that Mr Asaboa (obviously some clever intellectual play name worthy of a Times crossword man and standing for something else when decoded) has been rumbled he strangely seems to have lost his enthusiasm for posting any further.


How wrong can you be?! I'll start by telling the origin of my user name. I'm a Millwall fan and we recently signed a striker called Carl Asaba. But one of my mates thought we'd signed "some bloke called Asaboa", which I thought was funny, hence the user name.

I actually agreed with the principle of your argument, ironically enough until I came on this site and saw the things listed above which p1ssed me off (eg, saying you words to the effect of you wish Ofcom had been blown up in the 7/7 attacks).

Honestly, I'm proud you think that I'm the CEO of Ofcom, but truth be told, I'm 19. So if I can hit CEO level at 19 then I've done pretty well.

Tbh, I think your conspiracy theories are quite hilarious. You are not that important. You are just the sort of people who are never happy unless you are whinging.

So what if you have to pay 40p a minute to donate. So what? It only takes a minute to donate money over one of those helplines.

I'm a barman, and all day I have to put up with people whinging and complaining, and it really makes me laugh to think that some people are never happy unless they're whinging.

But anyway, I'm too busy for this. I've got a regulatory body to run.  Wink
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
bbb_uk
Global Moderator
*****
Offline



Posts: 2,041
Re: Contempt...
Reply #14 - Oct 16th, 2005 at 12:40am
 
Quote:
So what if you have to pay 40p a minute to donate. So what? It only takes a minute to donate money over one of those helplines.
That 40ppm wasn't the donation line. It was the cost that people were paying to ring the helpline because the government chose that number over a geographical even though they didn't really need to. You should not have been expected to pay upto 40ppm to call the helpline (remember there was a queue for obvious reasons and people were on hold in excess of 30mins as reported in the press).  At such time you would ring the helpline regardless of where you were so if you were out and about and not in front of a landline then you were looking at about 40ppm which meant a bill of £12 from a payphone/mobile assuming you were on contract.  Those on PAYG would have easily have run out of credit.  It wouldn't have been that bad had it been a donation line because then people would know that the proceeds were going towards it and like you said it would have only been a very quick call. 

It was only after the government received the complaints did it realise it made a mistake in using a geographical and hence why they will now use a geographical for those ringing from a payphone/mobile or from abroad.

I suggest you read my post again.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Send Topic Print
(Moderators: Forum Admin, Dave, CJT-80, DaveM, bbb_uk)

Website and Content © 1999-2024 SAYNOTO0870.COM. All Rights Reserved.
Written permission is required to duplicate any of the content within this site.

WARNING: This is an open forum, posts are NOT endorsed by SAYNOTO0870.COM,
please exercise due caution when acting on any info from here.


SAYNOTO0870.COM » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved.


Valid RSS Valid XHTML Valid CSS Powered by Perl Source Forge