Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
SAYNOTO0870.COM

<---- Back to main website

 
Home Help Search Login Register

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 ... 19
Send Topic Print
Responses to Ofcom consultation hit 1,159 (Read 235,890 times)
beginner
Newbie
*
Offline



Posts: 41
Re: Read the public's 422 comments to Ofcom here..
Reply #120 - Nov 18th, 2005 at 8:00am
 
Seems the public responses are 'drying up'.
The promised campaign emails from Daniel (& martin MSE!!) seem to evapourated, what can now be done?
This is all very disappointing from the 'powers that be' on site.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
NonGeographicalMan
Ex Member


Re: Read the public's 422 comments to Ofcom here..
Reply #121 - Nov 18th, 2005 at 8:41am
 
AJR wrote on Nov 18th, 2005 at 7:47am:
No new submissions on the Ofcom website since Nov 15.


Perhaps they are trying to think of a new strategy for displaying another 500?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
AJR
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 107
Re: Read the public's 422 comments to Ofcom here..
Reply #122 - Nov 21st, 2005 at 4:25pm
 
There were 468 submissions to the 0870 debate on the Ofcom website today at 4pm, an increase of 46 (I don't think the new ones were there on Friday).

(And here's a reminder of where you can read the comments: http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/nts_forward/responses/)

These are the new ones added today.

Barnes D
Botibol D
Caves F
Crisp K D
Davani S
Digby J
Edgar I
Fisher M
Gorman-Charlton J
Healey D
Heather C
Horswill A
MacCallum I
Marchant H
McAsey A
Milson A
Name Withheld 1
Name Withheld 33
Name Withheld 34
Name Withheld 35
Name Withheld 36
Name Withheld 37
Name Withheld 38
Name Withheld 39
Name Withheld 40
Newbery P
Nixon R
Novacaster Ltd
Potter C
Read M R
Rowland S
Salaman B
Shepherd C
Simpson K A
Sweetman J
Teall K
Thorpe R
Timewell S
van Blankenstein M
Vincent R A
Wadsworth A
Whitfield M
Williams G
Williamson J
Woolf A
Ye A
Back to top
« Last Edit: Nov 21st, 2005 at 4:28pm by AJR »  
 
IP Logged
 
omy
Full Member
***
Offline


I came - I saw - I went
home.

Posts: 129
Re: Read the public's 468 comments to Ofcom here..
Reply #123 - Nov 22nd, 2005 at 5:46am
 
Reading through the new posts, it certainly seems that about 90% (of those who give names) are calling for 0870/0845 to be included in the 'free call' packages. Pity more weren't suggesting that 0870/0845 simply be moved onto 09 premium .
However surely Ofcom will need to heed this large opinion and act? (sorry, porkers flying overhead disturbed my logic, there!!). Cry
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
AJR
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 107
Re: Read the public's 468 comments to Ofcom here..
Reply #124 - Nov 22nd, 2005 at 10:27pm
 
There were 503 submissions to the 0870 debate on the Ofcom website today (Nov 22) at 6pm, a net increase of 35 since 4pm on Nov 21.

There were 41 new comments today but mysteriously, as far as I can see, six were dropped. (My apologies if I've missed these somehow.)

(Here's a reminder of where you can read the comments: http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/nts_forward/responses/)

These are the 41 new ones added today.

Calascione J
Cassini M
Cordell R
Cushing R
Doshi C
Farnham D
Forrest L
Goddard P
Harris N
Ho'Vell B
Hohler R
Holland D
Huggons S
Kronfli G
Lawrence B
Name Withheld 41
Name Withheld 42
Name Withheld 43
Name Withheld 44
Name Withheld 45
Name Withheld 46
Name Withheld 47
Name Withheld 48
Name Withheld 49
Name Withheld 50
Name Withheld 51
Name Withheld 52
Name Withheld 53
Name Withheld 54
Neve D
Parker A
Perrins L
Pochin C W D
Ritchie W
Robson A
Southampton Football Club
Steele T
Struck A
Strugnell L
Wellham M
Williams J

And these are the six that have disappeared:

Etherington B
Gupta S
Murphy W
Sim N
Wadsworth A
West H

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
NonGeographicalMan
Ex Member


Re: Read the public's 503 comments to Ofcom here..
Reply #125 - Nov 22nd, 2005 at 10:31pm
 
The disappearance of these documents just reflects standard Ofcom ineptitude.  Who knows how many more responses they have received that they have lost. Roll Eyes

They still haven't published the response on the 070 consultation despite my demands for them to do so, and despite them only allowing 2 weeks for that consultation the lady responsible for it then immediately pushed off on holiday for a week or more.  So how was it they could only allow 2 weeks for that consultation. Shocked Angry
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
idb
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1,499
Miami, Florida, United States
Gender: male
Re: Read the public's 468 comments to Ofcom here..
Reply #126 - Nov 22nd, 2005 at 10:47pm
 
AJR wrote on Nov 22nd, 2005 at 10:27pm:
Southampton Football Club
This one is interesting. This is indicative of just how precious the revenue share really is and demonstrates what many of us have thought for a long time.
Back to top
 

As from November 21, 2013, I no longer participate in the forum and am unable to receive private messages.
 
IP Logged
 
beginner
Newbie
*
Offline



Posts: 41
Re: Read the public's 503 comments to Ofcom here..
Reply #127 - Nov 23rd, 2005 at 1:37pm
 
Thanks,AJR, for keeping the updates going.
I must say I found 'Witheld 54' gave a very interesting answer to Q7:-
YES I agree that the package of measures we propose to introduce will tackle
most of the problems

My italics!!
Surely Ofcom don't employ people so dim they cannot follow simple instructions?? Now let me think about that for a moment.....
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
NonGeographicalMan
Ex Member


Re: Read the public's 503 comments to Ofcom here..
Reply #128 - Nov 23rd, 2005 at 2:03pm
 
beginner wrote on Nov 23rd, 2005 at 1:37pm:
Thanks,AJR, for keeping the updates going.
I must say I found 'Witheld 54' gave a very interesting answer to Q7:-
YES I agree that the package of measures we propose to introduce will tackle
most of the problems

My italics!!
Surely Ofcom don't employ people so dim they cannot follow simple instructions?? Now let me think about that for a moment.....


I think we should submit an FOI request asking whether any of the people who have responded to the consultation are also employees of Ofcom.  The alternative would be to ask for a list of all their employees but I am sure they will refuse to release that on confidentiality grounds.

Obviously this request needs to be submitted after the consultation has closed.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
beginner
Newbie
*
Offline



Posts: 41
Re: Read the public's 503 comments to Ofcom here..
Reply #129 - Nov 23rd, 2005 at 2:42pm
 
Completely agree, NGM, I've long suspected not all is as it seems with the responses, in particular those not willing to be named (and shamed!! perhaps?)
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
NonGeographicalMan
Ex Member


Re: Read the public's 503 comments to Ofcom here..
Reply #130 - Nov 23rd, 2005 at 3:22pm
 
beginner wrote on Nov 23rd, 2005 at 2:42pm:
Completely agree, NGM, I've long suspected not all is as it seems with the responses, in particular those not willing to be named (and shamed!! perhaps?)


I'm also concerned about a large number of the named ones that just say Yes, Yes, Yes and just send back the questionnaire form.  I suppose a call to the Ofcom switchboard to be asked to be put through to some of those people could be illuminating.

By the way beginner you're not available for this forum at Ofcom in London tomorrow afternoon between 3pm and 5pm are you?

You seem to have very sensible views and we still have two places out of five left to take up at the forum.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
beginner
Newbie
*
Offline



Posts: 41
Re: Read the public's 503 comments to Ofcom here..
Reply #131 - Nov 23rd, 2005 at 3:33pm
 
Sorry, not possible to be there this time, but I hope you all do well and I would certainly be grateful for any feedback from the meet.  Maybe you could ask to be 'minutes secretary' !!!
Best wishes (from us all, I suspect).
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
AJR
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 107
Re: Read the public's 503 comments to Ofcom here..
Reply #132 - Nov 23rd, 2005 at 11:11pm
 
There were 594 submissions to the 0870 debate on the Ofcom website today (Nov 23) at 6pm, an increase of 91 since 6pm on Nov 22.

(Here's a reminder of where you can read the comments: http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/nts_forward/responses/)

These are the new ones added today.

Anderson J
Baldwin J
Barnes M
Barrett A
Bird C
Brooke D
Brown J D
Butt Dr. A
Callen A
Chaffey D
Chaikin Linekar Z A
Clements M
Cooper B
Cradock J
Dalal V C
Davey S C
Douglas-Jones R
Dunning D
Dyson L S
Ellawala M
Fairweather I
Fenton N
Fleet J
Galley R
Gatling A D
Gavine I B
George G
Gill D
Goodliffe P
Goodwin J
Hammersley N
Haverty D
Heneker S
Hicks G
Huntley Rev. D A
Hutchinson K D
James M
Jones D H
Jones J I
Kawalec K
Kelly S
Kelsey A
Kelsey D
Khan R
Leigh J R
Loxton J
Lumb D
Matalia A
Moore C
Name Withheld 55
Name Withheld 56
Name Withheld 57
Name Withheld 58
Name Withheld 59
Name Withheld 60
Name Withheld 61
Name Withheld 62
Name Withheld 63
Name Withheld 64
Name Withheld 66
Name Withheld 67
Name Withheld 68
Name Withheld 69
Name withheld 70
Name Withheld 71
Parker D
Peak M
Perry H G O
Phee M
Phillips P
Pickles W
Porley R
Pritchard B
Pugh D
Redpath J
Rogers G
Rollison M F
Samson W
Semmens G
Smith P M
Smith V
Spooner J
Spooner R
Stop Silent Calls Campaign
Sunley R
Tuck D W
Vestey D
Waylett R
Whitham M
Wilson R
Woodhams T
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
idb
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1,499
Miami, Florida, United States
Gender: male
Re: Read the public's 594 comments to Ofcom here..
Reply #133 - Nov 23rd, 2005 at 11:16pm
 
I congratulate you on keeping track of these responses as, once again, Ofcom has seen fit to reorganize the list. Just what have they done to, for example, http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/nts_forward/responses/af/ ? Is this ordering solely designed to confuse? Why can't this shambolic organization employ some competent staff?
Back to top
 

As from November 21, 2013, I no longer participate in the forum and am unable to receive private messages.
 
IP Logged
 
AJR
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 107
Re: Read the public's 503 comments to Ofcom here..
Reply #134 - Nov 23rd, 2005 at 11:21pm
 
Quote:
I'm also concerned about a large number of the named ones that just say Yes, Yes, Yes and just send back the questionnaire form.  I suppose a call to the Ofcom switchboard to be asked to be put through to some of those people could be illuminating.


Has anyone checked how many of these there are? It would be interesting to know. I don't think I can check on this while keeping track of new submissions but maybe someone else would like to have a look if they can spare the time.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 ... 19
Send Topic Print
(Moderators: Dave, Forum Admin, bbb_uk, DaveM, CJT-80)

Website and Content © 1999-2024 SAYNOTO0870.COM. All Rights Reserved. (DE)
Written permission is required to duplicate any of the content within this site.

WARNING: This is an open forum, posts are NOT endorsed by SAYNOTO0870.COM,
please exercise due caution when acting on any info from here.


SAYNOTO0870.COM » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved.


Valid RSS Valid XHTML Valid CSS Powered by Perl Source Forge