Quote:But presumably your point about having geographic alternatives published would be so that you can bypass any charging structure that was "premium" if such a scheme was imposed. I guess the purpose of having 101 as an access number is that it forces a different routing dependant on the called party's location (yes it can work with mobile's too, though cellular transmitter location ID is yet to be used in the uk). My point was that because it depends on your location, you would have to have an alternative geographic number for all potential receiving authorities
No I live in the real world rather than in your theoretical world.
In the real world most citizens live rather dull and predicatable lives where they live in one location and go to work in another.
Therefore they know who their police authority and their local council is and can get the specific geographic number for those bodies from the phone book, from directory enquiries or from the websites for those bodies. These calls will be charged at whatever rate applicable on your call package with your current phone provider. As per 01 and 02 or 0845 and 0870 for that matter.
101 is just a helpful add on overlay in addition to the geographic numbers, so that if you are out of area you call 101 and it costs you no more than on the package you are on because 101 should be charged on just the same basis as calling an 01 or 02 number.
Just because the number is 101 that does not mean it cannot be charged on the same geographic tariff as 01 or 02 numbers. That is just the crazed scheme of Pito (the 0870 casualty bombings number people) and the Home Office who are already high on the abuses of 0845 and 0870 and not in touch with the movement to return everything to geographic call pricing.
Are you sure you shouldn't be called ILoveNumberTranslation?