idb wrote on Dec 10
th, 2005 at 12:31pm:
Obviously my main concern is that calls can be made from outside the UK.
Can anyone tell me whether the proposed 101 number will mean that police forces will not publish geographic numbers for the public any longer?
Is the 101 issue actually irrelevant to people like myself that live overseas; ie should I ignore this consultation?
Those all seem to be issues that our press on modernising friends in the Home Office, PITO and the police forces seem not to have thought about. Also since even someone working in London may need to call the West Sussex or Thames Valley Police then the issue of how to call another police force and whether they have a geographic NEN too (as compared to those current horrid 0845 numbers) arises even in the UK. Ditto for councils and so on.
The questions you raise above are all valid points to be made in your response idb as is the issue of the calls not being priced at geographic rates and even costing more than the BT Option 1 5.5p for 60 minutes off peak when many of these NEN calls will actually be made.
I suspect you will find this is worth at least 3 pages of A4 response if not the full 15 pages that you and I both mustered on NTS Way Forward.
Also you must mention why the Police think they need this single NEN number now just when PSTN phone calls are about to die out and when many European countries have had a single NEN for years. Also the non standardisation with the European 3 digit NEN code proposed by the EU and lastly the failure to propose a single NEN true Voip contact address as part of this consultation. This is totally unacceptable in 2005
I hesitate to point out the PRS consultation that is also closing on Dec 22nd too.
I fear there are things in that we should also comment.
Its all one spectrum of people having to pay non standard charges for calls to standard uk landlines and people not being properly informed of the call costs they have to pay for calling these numbers.