idb wrote on Aug 18
th, 2007 at 1:14am:
Letter from Lesley Strathie, dated 11 July 2007:
The Secretary of State has asked me to respond to your question asking what assessment he has made of the likely effect that the change to the use of the 0845 number for Jobcentre Plus will have on Jobcentre Plus local offices and their customers.
[…]
We recognise that the telephone is not suitable for all customers and for this reason we continue to offer alternative means to contact us and to make benefit claims.
Sounds like a typical DVLA-style reply.
Talking of which:
idb wrote on Aug 18
th, 2007 at 1:11am:
Gillian Merron: The total revenue raised by Department for Transport agencies since the Department was formed in 2002 is as follows:
Total revenue (£)
DVLA
2002-03
656,164
2003-04
874,965
2004-05
1,945,131
2005-06
2,423,517
2006-07
2,894,284
DSA
2002-03
(1)n/a
2003-04
(1)702,326
2004-05
(1)706,399
2005-06
(1)693,254
2006-07
(1)623,284
HA
(2)0
MCA
(2)0
VGA
(3)0
VOSA
2002-03
(1,4)n/a
2003-04
(4)10,386
2004-05
(4)63,407
2005-06
(4)72,397
n/a = not available
(1 )Figures only available since 2003-04
(2 )0870 service is non-revenue generating
(3 )Has no 0870 numbers
(4 )Figures only available from 2003-04. 2005-06 figure is subject to completion of audited accounts
Who's with me in betting that the DVLA makes over £3 million this year (or would have if the changes that are proposed weren't/aren't going to happen)? Full marks to the DVLA for taxing those buy their tax disc via the "new" 0870 number rather than supporting their local Post Office.
Also remember that these figures are the amount paid to the call-recipients. The amount that callers have paid above the price of an 01/02 call will be far higher.
Those with (2) by them apparently let their telecoms provider take all the revenue.