Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
SAYNOTO0870.COM

<---- Back to main website

 
Home Help Search Login Register

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
AN Additional Solution (Read 18,482 times)
frankenfurter
Newbie
*
Offline



Posts: 4
AN Additional Solution
Nov 7th, 2005 at 1:53pm
 
The technology exists to have a fair queueing system when calling a number, before accepting to be placed in a queue you are given your position in that queue.
"You are being placed in a queue there are ## people before you". then every so often a message saying how our place is progressing.
Its in use in Holland and voluntarily by some companies in UK.
I think companies with queuing systems should be forced to use it then its our decision if we wait on or not or try later.
No more endless waiting in the unknown
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
AJR
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 107
Re: AN Additional Solution
Reply #1 - Nov 7th, 2005 at 2:09pm
 
Not only that, but charging should be stopped when you are put on hold, just as if the phone had not been answered. It's not your fault that you have to wait in a queue, so why should you be charged to do so?

Call charges should only apply when a real person answers the phone, not when you are listening to music or doing the job of routing the call to its destination by choosing from menu options (press one for sales, press two for technical support etc.)
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
dorf
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


I hate Qs on Premium NGNs

Posts: 575
UK
Gender: male
Re: AN Additional Solution
Reply #2 - Nov 7th, 2005 at 5:58pm
 
Hi AJR,

I am afraid that I do not agree at all! Why should a Premium be charged to speak to a real Human Being? That is what the telephone was originally invented for!

Ordinary conversation on the telephone is not an added value service. It is a normal telephone call. I do not accept that a Premium should be charged unless there is a true added-value service provided, which the caller actually wants to purchase; and even then it should not be permissible for a Premium to be charged until the receiving subscriber has specifically confirmed that they wish to pay for it, by means of a PIN or something like that, which would stop the scams with reverse charge calls, unwanted Premium text messages and Trojan Diallers etc. That is the normal legal basis of purchase.

You would not accept being charged for goods just because you entered a shop and browsed them - would you? The current situation with telephone scams is identical to that absurdity, but most people have been hoodwinked into not seeing it for what it is.
Back to top
 

Ofcom are completely ineffectual
 
IP Logged
 
mc661
Senior Member
****
Offline


Habitual FOI requester.

Posts: 432
West-Norfolk
Gender: male
Re: AN Additional Solution
Reply #3 - Nov 8th, 2005 at 6:22am
 
My local council uses one of these "you are in postion number X" systems. But they use it on a standard 01553 number.

However I have called many times on behalf of people and have been told I was in postion number 1 for about 35 mins.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
firestop
Full Member
***
Offline


Do unto others, before
they get a chance to
do....

Posts: 164
Re: AN Additional Solution
Reply #4 - Nov 8th, 2005 at 8:01am
 
I'm with dorf on this one - a telephone call to another person has no 'added value' in the vast majority of cases, so why should we all pay this extra premium?
As my submission to Ofcom said, only the total removal of 0870/0845 with all premium calls going to 09 will be satisfactory.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
AJR
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 107
Re: AN Additional Solution
Reply #5 - Nov 8th, 2005 at 9:17am
 
I'm confused by the comments on this thread about call queuing. Maybe what I said wasn't very clear. My apologies if that's the case.

I didn't say or mean to imply that a premium should be charged for talking to a person. What I said was almost the opposite of that. I just said that when there is call queuing there should be no charge at all until you're actually connected to the person you want to talk to.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
firestop
Full Member
***
Offline


Do unto others, before
they get a chance to
do....

Posts: 164
Re: AN Additional Solution
Reply #6 - Nov 8th, 2005 at 10:10am
 
I think, AJR, that dorf was meaning the 0870 rate is a Premium charge rate, so when you are connected to the human you are still going to be charged the covert premium rate of 8p or more per min).
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
dorf
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


I hate Qs on Premium NGNs

Posts: 575
UK
Gender: male
Re: AN Additional Solution
Reply #7 - Nov 8th, 2005 at 10:48am
 
Yes that is the basis on which I was thinking. Perhaps I misunderstood what you meant AJR.

If you are suggesting that no Premium should be charged for speaking to a normal person, and no Premium should be charged whilst queuing, then surely there is an easier and clearer way to state that. That is: all normal calls where you will end up speaking to a person, without any added value which you wish to and have agreed to purchase, should be charged at Geographic rates both for call queuing and the actual conversation.

Where calls are queued on a normal Geographic number if you are using a low-cost provider like 1889 it really does not usually matter if you are charged whilst queuing. The call will cost you 3 p for up to 2 hours. That is what we are so angry about in these NGN abuses.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Nov 8th, 2005 at 10:52am by dorf »  

Ofcom are completely ineffectual
 
IP Logged
 
andy9
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 505
Re: AN Additional Solution
Reply #8 - Nov 8th, 2005 at 2:00pm
 
I thought it looked pretty clear that AJR was suggesting time spent in the queue was not chargeable to the caller, and once answered they were paying for the call.

No mention was made of premium rate or not, or what type of number might be used.

Perhaps if a new 08 prefix was used, and once connected, calls cost 1 or 2p per minute, few people would complain (only 18866 etc customers?)
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Shiggaddi
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 411
Saltash, Cornwall
Gender: male
Re: AN Additional Solution
Reply #9 - Nov 8th, 2005 at 3:22pm
 
In the dark ages of the telephone, when the GPO and later BT, they had an excellent system of not charing for waiting for someone to answer.

I seem to vaguely remember that before answerphones, 1571, voicemail, call centres, call queueing etc were invented, we used to have this brilliant system whereby you phoned someone, and listened to the ringing.  If nobody answered within a reasonable amount of time, then the caller assumes the person is unavailable and tries again later, and is only charged for the call, if the caller answers.

I do believe that some people still use this service to this day!!
Back to top
 

I realy hait itt wen peeple canot spel proply. Itt getts onn mye nervs sew mutch annd streses mee owt. Knot onley iz itt vary bade speling butt allso bade gramer.
 
IP Logged
 
firestop
Full Member
***
Offline


Do unto others, before
they get a chance to
do....

Posts: 164
Re: AN Additional Solution
Reply #10 - Nov 8th, 2005 at 3:31pm
 
Yes, Shiggaddi, I remember them well! Button A and B in call boxes - bring it all back. Calls were 2d each for 3mins and this was MUCH more expensive, comparatively, than now, so maybe I don't want to go back!!

Andy9, I used the term 'premium' in my first post as 'premium rate' is how BT refers to 0870 call charges.

I would be OK with your idea of no charge for waiting then 1p/2p once speaking to someone - but pigs might fly as well Wink
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
andy9
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 505
Re: AN Additional Solution
Reply #11 - Nov 8th, 2005 at 6:14pm
 
Quote:
I would be OK with your idea of no charge for waiting then 1p/2p once speaking to someone - but pigs might fly as well Wink
I've just been looking at an 0800 number provider that charges the receiver 2p/min; wholesale must be a lot cheaper. So split the cost - roll on a new 0815 or similar
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
frankenfurter
Newbie
*
Offline



Posts: 4
Re: AN Additional Solution
Reply #12 - Nov 8th, 2005 at 6:28pm
 
Looking back I think I should have placed this original post in a different category.
My idea of a fair queueing system should be for all queues. Not just 0870 or 0845 numbers.
I think that where ever we are paying for a call we should have a right to know our place in the queue so we can make an informed decision as to wether we are willing to wait that long or not.
AngryI've waited 30 minutes without a connection before now with the dillema of should I stay, maybe it will answer soon or shall I quit and accept the loss I already made.
My god thats soo frustrating and so very wrong Angry
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
frankenfurter
Newbie
*
Offline



Posts: 4
Re: AN Additional Solution
Reply #13 - Nov 8th, 2005 at 6:31pm
 
Quote:
Yes, Shiggaddi, I remember them well! Button A and B in call boxes - bring it all back. Calls were 2d each for 3mins and this was MUCH more expensive, comparatively, than now, so maybe I don't want to go back!!

Andy9, I used the term 'premium' in my first post as 'premium rate' is how BT refers to 0870 call charges.

I would be OK with your idea of no charge for waiting then 1p/2p once speaking to someone - but pigs might fly as well Wink


And I thought I was getting old  Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
andy9
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 505
Re: AN Additional Solution
Reply #14 - Nov 8th, 2005 at 7:49pm
 
Quote:
Looking back I think I should have placed this original post in a different category.
My idea of a fair queueing system should be for all queues. Not just 0870 or 0845 numbers.
(

I hope we realised that. In fact my ISP has been doing this as long as I can remember - certainly on its present phone company anyway - whether you ring on 0845 or 0207
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
(Moderators: CJT-80, DaveM, bbb_uk, Dave, Forum Admin)

Website and Content © 1999-2024 SAYNOTO0870.COM. All Rights Reserved. (DE)
Written permission is required to duplicate any of the content within this site.

WARNING: This is an open forum, posts are NOT endorsed by SAYNOTO0870.COM,
please exercise due caution when acting on any info from here.


SAYNOTO0870.COM » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved.


Valid RSS Valid XHTML Valid CSS Powered by Perl Source Forge