andy9 wrote on Nov 10
th, 2005 at 3:54pm:
I don't think we are entitled to prejudge what Ofcom's conclusions and actions will be. Perhaps there will be some overdue rather more widespread reconstruction of numbering systems, that lead to clearer understanding of charges.
As for Martin, he has informed all his email subscribers; it is prominently featured on a number of threads on his forum, including links to here by people who are members of both.
He is obviously very busy all the time, and as some people suggested to me after certain events, perhaps has become a victim of his own success and doesn't have enough time to devote to everything.
Certainly I thought his article about roaming abroad with your mobile would have benefitted from more research time; he did modify it with more information from some members, but not as much as suggested; you can save much more.
Perhaps he thinks he has done enough; or perhaps he too thinks that his average subscriber is of the low intelligence that people here have cliquishly suggested, and would not cope with the issues; perhaps he remembers other remarks ...
Or perhaps after bringing it back to attention in this newsletter, he will develop the issue more in the near future.
The key point which most people in this thread seems to miss is that Ofcom now propose to retain 0845 numbers, which Ofcom encouraged the COI to get government departments to switch to from 0870, as a revenue share number excluded from BT Option 3 etc for about the next 3 to 4 years (i.e. at least 2 years longer than 0870 which are not themselves going to change for at least 21 months - that's 1 year from the date when Ofcom announces the clock starts ticking which is sure to be way into 2006). Also Ofcom proposals do not stop the ever increasing percentage of calls made from mobile numbers to 0845 and 0870 continuing to charge them as a premium rate call class. Of course if revenue share is ended then there should be no incentive at all for them to go on doing this but as the mobile phone companies operate in a cartel like manner, in respect of many business practices, the fact is that they will do it if they think they can get away with it and Ofcom allows them to.
So Ofcom's proposals are wholly deficient as most people in this forum well know (also allowing 0871 and 0844 to not be forced to move to 09 is a wholly deficient proposal) but Martin Lewis now portrays Ofcom as the heroes who have decided off their own bat to do sometihing. Whereas they and their predecessor siblings OFTEL are in fact the villains who have allowed this scam to continue for years longer than it needed to and only virtually at the point of a gun are Ofcom now actually doing the minimum they think they can possibly get away with so as not to upset all their telco friends too much.