Quote:DonQuixote wrote on Dec 12
th, 2005 at 12:35am:
If you follow this logic, then mobile phone calls should be charged at local rate and the called party should pay the rest, right? So all mobile phone users would pay for incoming calls...
This is absolutely what should happen since it is the called party and not the caller who derives any advantage from the mobile phone's use. [...]
Whilst I agree that the payment to the mobile network can be seen as a micro-payment, on balance, I don't agree that the receiver should have to pay per minute for receiving calls. I also think that the assertion that it is the receiving party who is benefiting is suspect. What alternative contact methods are there when mobile?
Remember that NTS just routes to a landline. Therefore a normal landline number could be given out instead. It is the receiving party who has put that barrier in the way, as it were.
Quote:Under this system the mobile phone call cost is driven as low as possible because the recipient doesn't want to pay excessive charges. But under a system where a £250 mobile phone is presented as free to the owner and this is in fact recouped through excessive contract charges and ripoff charges to your mobile phone callers uk mobile phone call costs are some of the most expensive in the world. [...]
Whilst this makes sense, my principal objection would be that I would have to pay to receive calls, probably on a
per minute basis, the same as we have to pay for NTS now. I object to paying to receive calls on a telephone because the system works on the principal that the caller pays
to call the recipient subscriber.
All subscribers should have to pay a service charge, and this is known as 'line rental' with a landline telephone. IMO this term is misused with mobile providers because it goes to subsidising a 'free' or reduced price handset and to pay for inclusive minutes. Calls outside inclusive minutes are often as expensive as pay as you go rates.
I would therefore be quite happy to pay a fixed amount in line rental for my mobile connection in return for lower call charges. This would also replace the increased costs that my callers have to pay to call me. After all, mobile calls are
presumably higher rate because of the higher cost of running a mobile network (or so you would think).