Going through the history of Ofcom's consultations, I noticed the one titled,
Regulation on VoIP Services. At the time, I never got around to reading this so therefore didn't reply to the consultation but curious at who had replied I noticed the response from Hazel Blears
here.
I quote from it:-
Quote:I am writing on behalf of the Home Office, the Police Service and other agencies to express concern about the light-touch approach Ofcom is taking to ensuring the availability of access to the emergency services to users of VoIP services, as set out in Ofcom's further consultation on the regulation of VoIP services.
We are dealing here with an important public safety issue, with the possibility of thousands of consumers living and working without immediate means of summoning emergency assistance, and very possibility, without the knowledge that they are in such a situation. That is too important an issue to leave entirely to the marketplace to resolve...
Reading more into, it appears that our infamous Ofcom and what seems their main policy on avoiding any/all regulation, wanted to leave it upto VoIP providers whether they provided access to emergency services or not. Basically, Ofcom were only encouraging VoIP providers to provide access to emergency services but not actually making it so they had no choice.
Hazel Blears and co obviously (and good on them) don't like this at all!
Maybe we should inform Hazel Blears that it isn't just on this occasion that Ofcom have taken a lighter-touch to teleco's instead of using their regulatory powers? As we all know, Ofcom have always shown favourtism towards teleco's even if that means it is a detriment to us consumers!
Come on Ofcom - take note that you are here for us consumers as well, or have you forgotten?