lompos wrote on Sep 3
rd, 2006 at 8:54am:
Quote:A freephone number would have cost too much
Too much for the UK Government? What is the actual cost of a freephone number for, say, one week which is all that is required here.
Well for some unknown reason government bodies generally choose BT most likely because they have contract with BT.
If you take a look
here then it would cost around 5ppm for every minute us citizens are on the phone to them, with a £11.75 additional linerental for the number. I assume there is also a minimum period of about a month if not longer knowing how BT generally work.
There are other 080x providers out there but government bodies generally choose BT probably expecting a good service when in fact they will be getting ripped off compared to other providers.
I would love to see more use of freephone numbers but in the UK the use of these numbers is still expensive I believe.
MoD, like many other government departments, companies and citizens, probably think 0845 is local rate so therefore MoD probably think their use of this number is not expensive because its charged at so-called "local rates." They probably don't realise this isn't true, and that 0845 can cost upto 40ppm from some mobiles and that they are generally excluded from any inclusive price plans us citizens may have.