Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
SAYNOTO0870.COM

<---- Back to main website

 
Home Help Search Login Register

Pages: 1 ... 21 22 23 24 25 ... 50
Send Topic Print
NEG propaganda (Read 752,954 times)
derrick
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1,124
Re: NEG propaganda
Reply #330 - Sep 7th, 2007 at 4:44pm
 
I have received a response from the Ashton Health Centre, nothing more that you would expect:-

Main Surgery
Ashton Health Centre
Pedders Lane
Ashton
Preston
PR21HR

Tel:0844 4720001
Fax:0-1772768138
30th August 2007

Dear Mr Lawton,

Thank you for your letter regarding the telephone system that the three
practices use here at the health centre and I am sorry that you feel that are
communications network is unacceptable.

I can confirm however that the practice operates a Centrex Switchboard
system which is approved by the NHS bodies. The call charges to the
practice are that in line with the Telewest tariff for local call charges and are
4pence per minute which is the same as a BT network. The call charge could
be a maximum of 8pence per minute if being accessed via a mobile phone
network which again is line with BT charges.

The practice has not received a free switchboard or hardware from any
supplier, indeed the practices pay a monthly charge to the supplier to support
the facilities offered by a Centrex system.

I acknowledge your comments regarding queuing systems however previous
patient questionnaires and surveys heavily condemned the old system that
the practice employed and found constant engaged tones frustrating. The
telecommunications system which has been in place now for over 18 months
allows patients the option to select and access the most appropriate person
within the organisation without having to listen to an engaged tone. The
system also allows us to monitor our busiest times and therefore ensure
appropriate staff are in place to answer calls at the peak times. The queuing
system allows patients the option to either hold in a queue or call back if they
do not wish to hold. Although acknowledging your comments and concerns
the practice has received positive feedback in its recent patient satisfaction
surveys regarding the improved telephone access. Please also note that
patients can still call the old practice numbers if they so wish.

I have reviewed the Downing Street web-site and shall await with interest the
outcome of the petition in February 2008.

Thank you for raising your concerns with me and I will raise your specific
issues both with the practice user group and at the next internal review
meeting. I have also asked the Telewest Healthcare Manager to formally
review our contract and services offered to patients.

I have copied a copy of this response to the complaints team at Central
Lancashire PCT Should you still remain unsatisfied with the outcome of the
investigation you are able to contact the Healthcare commission for an
independent review of your case. The healthcare commission will review your
complaint within two months of the date of the final formal written response.
The Healthcare commission can be contacted at~:

Healthcare Commission
FREEPOST NAT 18958
Complaints Investigation Team
Manchester M1 9XZ
Telephone: 0845 6013012

Once again my sincere apologies and in the meantime if you would like to
discuss any aspect of this letter or meet with me please do not hesitate to
contact me.

Kind regards
Mrs L.A.Powler
Practice Manager
cc. Carol Hannon, Central Lancashire PCT

INVESTOR IN PEOPLE


Notice the bit that is at the bottom of the letter, that I have highlighted in red!

She is having a meeting next Wednesday, 12th September with Telewest and someone from the health board? not sure who that is , but then she is on leave so I do not expect any further correspondence for about 2 weeks when she has said she will get back to me.

I( have just spoken to Louise Fowler pointing out the errors in her letter re call charges, she tells me that 
Telewest Communications Plc. provides the number and the service and that Ashton Health Centre has no contract with NEG Surgeryline! I find that hard to believe, and that is where she has got her pricing from, I have explained that the practice should supply the geo number alongside the 0844 number and she has said that all the old 01772 numbers still work, but after the meeting next week she will need to have a "business meeting" within the practice to discuss the issues that I have raised


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
loddon
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 599
Reading  UK
Gender: male
Re: NEG propaganda
Reply #331 - Sep 7th, 2007 at 5:42pm
 
derrick wrote on Sep 7th, 2007 at 4:44pm:
Please also note that
patients can still call the old practice numbers if they so wish.


What's the problem?    Surely this is OK?   You can carry on using the old number if you prefer.    I wish my surgery would offer the same facility -- that is all I ask.

Have you tested to make sure the old numbers still work?
Back to top
« Last Edit: Sep 7th, 2007 at 5:44pm by loddon »  
Campaignagainstripofftelecoms  
IP Logged
 
Tanllan
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 797
Gender: male
Re: NEG propaganda
Reply #332 - Sep 7th, 2007 at 9:05pm
 
If it is centrex then all the facilities are there, 084 is being greedy.
But retaining the 01xxx is also good if confusing; why not just use normal, non revenue share number?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
SilentCallsVictim
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


aka NHS.Patient, DH_fairtelecoms

Posts: 2,494
Re: NEG propaganda
Reply #333 - Sep 7th, 2007 at 10:36pm
 
Tanllan wrote on Sep 7th, 2007 at 9:05pm:
If it is centrex then all the facilities are there, 084 is being greedy.
But retaining the 01xxx is also good if confusing; why not just use normal, non revenue share number?

Could one could assume that private patients (those who pay the doctor by calling the 0844 number) are given priority bookings!
Is this what is meant by NHS Choices - better services for those who choose to pay more?

Alternative numbers may help to build pressure to get premium rate numbers removed in the commercial sector, but - no, Loddon (#331) - some of us ask for more. No NHS patient should be penalised for their failure to discover a cheaper geographic alternative to the published 0844 number. Neither should other patients benefit from this additional improper contribution to the running costs of the surgery.

I hope, and believe, that I am not alone in fighting to defend the principles of the NHS for the sake of all, not simply seeking to protect my own position or attacking just one of a number of companies responsible for misleading doctors - [url]see http://www.davidhowarth.org.uk/?page=239&group=2[/url]

David
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
idb
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1,499
Miami, Florida, United States
Gender: male
Re: NEG propaganda
Reply #334 - Sep 7th, 2007 at 10:48pm
 
http://www.blackburncitizen.co.uk/display.var.1673932.0.row_over_health_centre_p...

Row over health centre phone lines
By Pete Magill

<<
HEALTH chiefs have been condemned for putting wealth before health' in a row over phone systems at a number of East Lancashire medical centres.

Patients at medical centres in Padiham, Burnley Wood and Clayton-le-Moors must dial an 0844 number to make appointments or order a repeat prescription.

The lines are thought to be four pence more per minute than a BT landline - and mobile phone users face call charges of up to 35 pence per minute.

NHS bosses say the system is more efficient though - as it can provide a number of phone lines via a single number and costs the same to call from anywhere in the UK.

All three centres come under East Lancashire Primary Care NHS Trust. None in Blackburn and Darwen are believed to operate the system.

"People have been complaining about this in Padiham and I think it is a bit of a disgrace," said Granville Lord, a former councillor and mayor of Padiham.

"This is all about accessibility and availability. If people can receive health advice over the phone or pick up a prescription, rather than making an appointment, then that is what most health centres tend to want these days.

"It is sad in this day and age that surgeries are putting wealth before health. If the system is not broken then why fix it?"

A spokesman from East Lancashire PCT said : "The 0844 numbers have been suggested to use by the Department of Health to assist in accessing GPs, given that the patient can ring anywhere in the country and it would still be a local call rate.

"In trying to streamline the GP practice answering service and to cut down waiting times on phone calls, the health centre turned to a new digital system that could give various options to patients when they phoned in.

"This has speeded up the service considerably, by reducing the time spent on the phone for patients, and helping to cut down on long and frustrating engaged' waiting times before a patient gets through, particularly at busy times.

"The evidence indicates that the majority of people use landlines to contact their GP and the number of patients affected because they are using a mobile is small.

"It is worth noting that the move to an efficient telephone system is anticipated to reduce the connection time for people making an appointment and of the few who use a mobile, fewer still will spend less than a minute on the phone."

The 0844 prefix has also been adopted by a number of surgeries in the Preston area.
>>
Back to top
 

As from November 21, 2013, I no longer participate in the forum and am unable to receive private messages.
 
IP Logged
 
derrick
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1,124
Re: NEG propaganda
Reply #335 - Sep 8th, 2007 at 7:01am
 
loddon wrote on Sep 7th, 2007 at 5:42pm:
derrick wrote on Sep 7th, 2007 at 4:44pm:
Please also note that
patients can still call the old practice numbers if they so wish.


What's the problem?    Surely this is OK?   You can carry on using the old number if you prefer.    I wish my surgery would offer the same facility -- that is all I ask.

Have you tested to make sure the old numbers still work?



The problem is that the geo numbers are not published,(look at the letter from the practice, there is only the 0844 number on it, although the fax number is geo), and unless you know about the geo number you will not be able to use it, also we do not know if/when these numbers will be withdrawn and it is not just.

It is not just about my practice as we need to stop ALL practices using these covert revenue sharing.

I did use one of the geo numbers to call the practice and yes it is working, but for how long?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
jgxenite
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


Help us to help you -
read the instructions!!

Posts: 1,454
Gender: male
Re: NEG propaganda
Reply #336 - Sep 8th, 2007 at 12:04pm
 
derrick wrote on Sep 7th, 2007 at 4:44pm:
The call charges to the practice are that in line with the Telewest tariff for local call charges and are
4pence per minute which is the same as a BT network. The call charge could
be a maximum of 8pence per minute if being accessed via a mobile phone
network which again is line with BT charges.


Sorry - local call charges are 4ppm? Since when? Also, a maximum of 8ppm from a mobile phone?! According to my phone provider, O2, calls to 0844 numbers are charged at 20-25ppm. That is hardly 8ppm!! What planet is Mrs Powler living on?!?!
Back to top
 

I don't mind helping you with your request as long as you read the instructions!
 
IP Logged
 
derrick
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1,124
Re: NEG propaganda
Reply #337 - Sep 8th, 2007 at 1:10pm
 
jgxenite wrote on Sep 8th, 2007 at 12:04pm:
derrick wrote on Sep 7th, 2007 at 4:44pm:
The call charges to the practice are that in line with the Telewest tariff for local call charges and are
4pence per minute which is the same as a BT network. The call charge could
be a maximum of 8pence per minute if being accessed via a mobile phone
network which again is line with BT charges.


Sorry - local call charges are 4ppm? Since when? Also, a maximum of 8ppm from a mobile phone?! According to my phone provider, O2, calls to 0844 numbers are charged at 20-25ppm. That is hardly 8ppm!! What planet is Mrs Powler living on?!?!



I have explained this to her re my post above, #338, at the bottom.

p s her name is Fowler, not Powler , that is my OCR not working correctly and me not picking it up  Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
derrick
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1,124
Re: NEG propaganda
Reply #338 - Sep 8th, 2007 at 2:42pm
 
Is this a glitch in the campaign re 0844 being revenue sharing? or am I missing something?

From BTs page, http://www.productsandservices.bt.com/btbusinessProducts/displayProduct.do?produ...

Under the heading "COSTS"

"Revenue share          No revenue share with this number"
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dave
Global Moderator
*****
Offline



Posts: 9,902
Yorkshire
Gender: male
Re: NEG propaganda
Reply #339 - Sep 8th, 2007 at 2:54pm
 
derrick wrote on Sep 8th, 2007 at 2:42pm:
Is this a glitch in the campaign re 0844 being revenue sharing? or am I missing something?

From BTs page, http://www.productsandservices.bt.com/btbusinessProducts/displayProduct.do?produ...

Under the heading "COSTS"

"Revenue share          No revenue share with this number"

It's up to the telco what revenue it pays.

For example, you doctor's surgery number starts 0844 472 which is a Telewest number. Let's assume that they get their 0844 number from ntl:Telewest. See this page which explains that subject to call volumes, revenue can be 'earned'.

Think about lower rate 0844s which are used for dial-up internet. They must generate enough revenue to pay for the service. They will also have high call volumes.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
derrick
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1,124
Re: NEG propaganda
Reply #340 - Sep 8th, 2007 at 3:12pm
 
Dave wrote on Sep 8th, 2007 at 2:54pm:
derrick wrote on Sep 8th, 2007 at 2:42pm:
Is this a glitch in the campaign re 0844 being revenue sharing? or am I missing something?

From BTs page, http://www.productsandservices.bt.com/btbusinessProducts/displayProduct.do?produ...

Under the heading "COSTS"

"Revenue share          No revenue share with this number"

It's up to the telco what revenue it pays.

For example, you doctor's surgery number starts 0844 472 which is a Telewest number. Let's assume that they get their 0844 number from ntl:Telewest. See this page which explains that subject to call volumes, revenue can be 'earned'.

Think about lower rate 0844s which are used for dial-up internet. They must generate enough revenue to pay for the service. They will also have high call volumes.



Yes I understand that, but why does BT say "No revenue share with this number"?

If I want to quote that page re the name for 0844 numbers being Contactcall, I might shoot myself in the foot because the organisation I am complaining to could just say, that page says "no revenue sharing with this number" and I can't get out of it!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dave
Global Moderator
*****
Offline



Posts: 9,902
Yorkshire
Gender: male
Re: NEG propaganda
Reply #341 - Sep 8th, 2007 at 3:14pm
 
derrick wrote on Sep 8th, 2007 at 3:12pm:
Yes I understand that, but why does BT say "No revenue share with this number"?

Because, evidently, BT does not pay revenue on its 0844 numbers.

derrick wrote on Sep 8th, 2007 at 3:12pm:
If I want to quote that page re the name for 0844 numbers being Contactcall, I might shoot myself in the foot because the organisation I am complaining to could just say, that page says "no revenue sharing with this number" and I can't get out of it!

But "Contactcall" is its brand name for 0844 and not what they are defined as throughout the industry.

You have evidence that your doctor's number is a Telewest one, so you could quote the page I pointed to.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Sep 8th, 2007 at 3:15pm by Dave »  
 
IP Logged
 
irrelevant
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 409
Re: NEG propaganda
Reply #342 - Sep 8th, 2007 at 6:06pm
 
There are lots of providers of 0844 numbers, just because BT doesn't provide revenue from them doesn't mean the rest don't - BT have traditionally been viewed as the expensive people to get service from.



Not related to this, but handy for general argument, I was doing some digging and came across this file:
http://www.flextel.co.uk/ofcom/20051206_ngn_cost_comparison.pdf

It's a handy list of call costs to various NGN prefixes from each of the mobile operators - I didn't know the range was so huge.. (£1.20/min to call an 0800??)  

It's 18months old now unfotunately, but gives it's sources so a new one could be compiled.  (Just checked t-mobile site here- up to £2.50/min to call "other 08")
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
SilentCallsVictim
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


aka NHS.Patient, DH_fairtelecoms

Posts: 2,494
Re: NEG propaganda
Reply #343 - Sep 8th, 2007 at 9:43pm
 
We know that 0844 numbers in general are revenue sharing. That is the basis of the NEG proposition, as declared in its published marketing literature. It is also the basis for campaigning efforts to enforce prohibition of their use by those who may not receive remuneration from callers - e.g. NHS GPs. It has been accepted by a GP who charges fees to patients who are constituents of the Home Secretary.

I am happy to campaign on that basis and will continue to do so.

There are doubtless many quirks and exceptional situations. If someone has clear evidence that seriously undermines the general understanding, then this must be brought forward. The evidence could be challenged, or we may have to give up campaigning on this basis. If there is simply some doubt, then it may be better to resolve this in private, rather than by questioning the basis of campaigning efforts in this public forum.

David
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
simond001
Newbie
*
Offline



Posts: 28
Re: NEG propaganda
Reply #344 - Sep 9th, 2007 at 8:08am
 
loddon wrote on Aug 30th, 2007 at 12:48pm:
simond001 wrote on Aug 30th, 2007 at 8:08am:
loddon wrote on Aug 30th, 2007 at 7:54am:
simond001 wrote on Aug 30th, 2007 at 7:46am:
[quote author=NGMsGhost link=1160182005/270#280 date=1188130721

If this campaign is for the benefit of the patient, you also need to address the implications if the 0844 is repalced with a geo number.  Do you remove the system and revert to a single person answering the phones, with the time and cost implications of that (no auto appointment bookings, no out of hours forwarding, no automatic signingin at the surgery etc..) or do you keep the system and its benefits and fund it from another source?



Simond001, could you please explain why all these things cannot be done, when using the telephone swithboard and associated equipment which you supply, together with a geographic number???


Lodden, I dont supply this equiptment.


As you won't answer my question I will give you my understanding.    All these functions can equally well be performed when using a geographic number.   These functions are provided by the equipment and not the 0844 number.  

It is apparently one of the many falsehoods given by NEG when selling their systems to doctors that they need to use 0844 in order to get these functions.    This is not true.

What doctors should be doing is preparing a specification of their requirements and then inviting competitive tenders from suppliers and comparing compliance and price before selecting their supplier and equipment.    One of the requirements should be that call costs to patients are no greater than standard 01/02 charges.    How many are actually comparing competitive proposals before selecting NEGs solution?


Lodden, apologies but i dont read this post frequently.

The acronyms I have used are as fllows.
mcc Minimum call charge. The minimum cost that is charged by the calling parties telecom provider for a call regardless of duration (BT 3pence to 5pence, BT payphone 40pence etc.)

IVR/ICR Interactive Voice / Call Response.This is the software that allows calls to be answered, and then directed to the correct extension when the user either speaks, or pressesbuttons on their handset. (Allows calls to be answered automatically, reducing the number of telephone operators who frequently take a call, and pas it straight to a different extension).

IN Intelligent network. The hardware and software that is used by Telco's to direct the NGN call to a specific nuber, and then reroute if certain parameters are met (out of hours, no answer, call volume exceed capacity of surgery etc.)

You are correct that all of these facilities can be achieved using a Geographic number. It would be a simple procedure to use a Local STD number that terminates at the IN, and is then delivered to either a surgery or other number as per the individual requirements. This is not an inexpensive option however as every call is counted as two calls (one from BT - the Geo provider and another rom the Geo provider to the surgery).

As i have no working history with NEG, i cannot offer an answer to whether Surgeries get alternative proposals for the services.

If you require any furthers answers from me directly, please email me to advise as I do not wish to appear rude by not responding in a timely manner.

Best regards. Simond
Back to top
« Last Edit: Sep 9th, 2007 at 8:09am by simond001 »  
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 21 22 23 24 25 ... 50
Send Topic Print
(Moderators: DaveM, bbb_uk, Dave, Forum Admin, CJT-80)

Website and Content © 1999-2024 SAYNOTO0870.COM. All Rights Reserved. (DE)
Written permission is required to duplicate any of the content within this site.

WARNING: This is an open forum, posts are NOT endorsed by SAYNOTO0870.COM,
please exercise due caution when acting on any info from here.


SAYNOTO0870.COM » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved.


Valid RSS Valid XHTML Valid CSS Powered by Perl Source Forge