Welcome.

I've removed your post in the Geographical section as you had posted here as well.

The most effective method appears to be MP's and EU law, etc and there are a few threads in this section which may help.

BobbyBoy here started a thread which may help you join the campaign.

Richmond upon Thames Council have a geographical number according to their Contact Us page on their website.

Jimmy S wrote on Oct 24^th, 2006 at 5:51am:

Local call catchment area?  What's that then?

Residential customers have not had such a thing since 1st July 2004 - when BT forced everyone to move onto one of the BT Together packages (most went onto BT Together Option 1) and made calls to all 01 or 02 numbers the same price (3p/minute weekdays and 5.5p for up to an hour evenings and weekends) regardless of where in the UK you are calling from.

bbb_uk wrote on Oct 24^th, 2006 at 9:29am:

That's what I thought until I clicked the Council Tax link and then the link to pay your council tax.

Quote:

So they are either complete liars or clueless about telecoms matters. 

The prefix 0870 389 is allocated to Opal Telecom, a part of the Carphone Warehouse Group. The change date on this number is 09/2006, so probably a new number range.

I think that this page tells the story really. It can be found be clicking on this graphic on Opal's website:


The above graphic cycles through the different numbers as follows:

• 0800 Calls free to your customers
• 0845 Appear local to everyone
• 0870 National number - no location
• 0871 National number - with earning potential
• 090 Premium rate number

Jimmy S, perhaps you can contact the local press about this. Other examples of media reports can be found on here. Doctor's surgeries are prime examples of these such press reports, along with the infamous and quite sick exploitation of the victims and their relatives of the London transport bombings.

You might like contacting Dee Doocey, local London Assembly member. It was her I contacted when I joined this site after the disgrace of the use of 0870 numbers during the London Bombings. She followed it up with the Police (she is/was on the Met Police Authority).

She might rattle some cages with local Lib Dem councillors.

bbb_uk wrote on Oct 26^th, 2006 at 6:44pm:

I think that people are believing that by saying that local and national rate are the same, that 0870 will also have fallen. The point (that I feel that you have to make) is that calling London to Glasgow, for example, is cheaper than calling 0870.

The rate we pay for 0870 now is, roughly speaking, likeable to the old BT national rate. The vast majority of providers charge round about the same, and usually no less than BT. Why is it acceptable for this public sector organisation to cling to this pre-competition rate?

Jimmy S wrote on Oct 24^th, 2006 at 5:51am:


Quite a few backbench MPs from have been active in asking Parliamentary questions over which government departments are using 084 and 087 numbers and over 50 signed the Parliamentary Early Day Motion condemning government department use of 0870 numbers.  This can be found at:-

http://edmi.parliament.uk/EDMi/EDMDetails.aspx?EDMID=28872%09%09%09%09%09%09%09&...

Known Parliamentary very active parliamentary opponents of 084/7 numbers include:-

Lord Tyler (formerly Paul Tyler the Lib Dem MP until the General Election)
Vince Cable MP
John Randall MP
Andrew Rosindell MP
Peter Bottomley MP
Anne Milton MP

This thread started by idb on the Parliamentary questions asked by Paul Tyler, Vince Cable, Andrew Rosindell and Anne Milton makes for interesting reading:-

www.saynoto0870.com/cgi-bin/forum/YaBB.cgi?num=1130983483/0

You have to realise though that there is a hidden New Labour agenda of stealth taxes behind the whole massive introduction of 084/7 numbers by government agencies like the DVLA, Passport Agency, Job Centres, Inland Revenue etc, etc and of course by the BBC.

Also those who run some of the largest 0870 call centre operations have been important financial contributors to New Labour coffers on the donations front and at least one of them has received a peerage.

Ofcom the telecoms regulatory body which is supposed to stamp out this scam and its predecessor OFTEL has been involved in an elaborate and prolonged scheme of avoidance of closing down these scam numbers (by endlessly consulting and then consulting again and then ignoring the responses to the consultations from the public it didn't like) despite public disquiet expressed over many years.  This seems to be because it has been heavily infiltrated by former senior communciations industry employees like Stephen Carter formerly of NTL and/or New Labour Cronies like Ed Richards, its new CEO.

See www.newlabourscandals.co.uk/bodies.htm and the section on Ofcom.