Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
SAYNOTO0870.COM

<---- Back to main website

 
Home Help Search Login Register

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
0870 vs. 0871 (Read 23,241 times)
lucaltmann
Newbie
*
Offline



Posts: 25
London
Gender: male
Re: 0870 vs. 0871
Reply #15 - Jan 31st, 2007 at 10:02am
 
Yeah that's but I still genuinely never use 08xx numbers usually use internet for that stuff.

Anyway thanks again for your help

Luc
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
NGMsGhost
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


The Forum Ghost of NonGeographicalMan<b
r />

Posts: 2,720
Surrey, United Kingdom
Gender: male
Re: 0870 vs. 0871
Reply #16 - Jan 31st, 2007 at 10:19am
 
lucaltmann wrote on Jan 31st, 2007 at 9:58am:
LMAO.  Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

Im getting opnion from various sources thanks and the ones at saynoto0870 have been very interesting and informed. I am aware of the tariff structure and the consultations.


Perhaps you shouldn't take our righteous anger on this topic too personally.

Our anger is mainly with Ofcom who many of us took long hours responding to the several consultations of on this subject only to be resoundingly ignored.

The point about 084/7 calls is not just that the calls cost extra but that it is an industry built on blatant and straightforward consumer deception and deceit about the costs of the calls and claiming that lower rate premium rate revenue share calls are "local" or "lo-call" rate and "national rate" when they are no such thing.  Our anger is about the failure of the regulator to put these services on the 09 prefix code which the public clearly identify as premium rate.  That is what happens in the USA for all such calls.

Ofcom has unfortunately been given the normal powers of the Office of Fair Trading and the Competition Commission for telecoms and broadcasting issues but it blatantly isn't enforcing them in respect of ensuring the public understand that these calls are not standard rate calls and are not misdescribed.  Also under Part 3 (i) of the Communications Act 2003 Ofcom's principal duty is supposed to be the protection of the citizen consumer  (See www.ofcom.org.uk/about/sdrp/). ; But under Stephen Carter Ofcom completely failed to act against his old mates at NTL (where he used to work) and other telcos ripping off consumers over 084/7 calls despite endless consumer pressure to do so.  084/7 calls are worth over £1 billion a year and are over 25% of UK call values, which is why the senior telco executives who have infiltrated Ofcom to stop their industry being closed down have refused to let it die.  Ofcom acts against things which don't cost companies serious money but look exciting presentationally (eg junk food adverts to kids) but it refuses to tackle the big scams worth billions to the telecoms industry.  It even has a regular Focus Group with the telecoms industry to  discuss how to minimise the impact of any changes to 084/7 call charge structures from which consumer interests are excluded:-

See www.ofcom.org.uk/telecoms/groups/nts_focus/notes/

See also these references as to why 084/7 are not Local/National Rate including the very interesting comments of Ian Livingston, CEO of BT Retail:-

The view of a county council trading standards department

Para 1.3 Page 1 of http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/oftel_0845/responses/leicester_cc.pdf

and
the view of the CEO of BT Retail, Ian Livingston

http://business.scotsman.com/banking.cfm?id=764772005

and

two recent guidances from the Advertising Standards Authority

www.asa.org.uk/cap/news_events/news/2005/Hanging+on+the+telephone+on+and+on+and+...

www.asa.org.uk/cap/news_events/news/2005/Stop+the+call+confusion.htm

and

the Parliamentary Early Day motion deploring the use of 0870 telephone numbers by government departments

http://edmi.parliament.uk/EDMi/EDMDetails.aspx?EDMID=28872%09%09%09%09%09%09%09&...; amp;SESSION=875

and

Another guidance from the Committee of Advertising Practice of the Advertising Standards Authority

www.cap.org.uk/cap/news_events/news/2005/CAP+rings+the+changes+for+telecoms+prov...

and Pages 5 and 6 of the below minutes from my own district council where we agreed policy to stop the future use of 0845 and 0870 numbers.

www.molevalley.gov.uk/media/pdf/1/s/Council_Minutes_190705.pdf

And the most recent ASA guidance saying that Inclusive call packages must not fail to disclose that 084/7 calls are excluded from them.

www.cap.org.uk/cap/news_events/news/2006/Ringing+the+Changes.htm
Back to top
 

<div style=
 
IP Logged
 
NGMsGhost
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


The Forum Ghost of NonGeographicalMan<b
r />

Posts: 2,720
Surrey, United Kingdom
Gender: male
Re: 0870 vs. 0871
Reply #17 - Jan 31st, 2007 at 10:24am
 
lucaltmann wrote on Jan 31st, 2007 at 10:02am:
Yeah that's but I still genuinely never use 08xx numbers usually use internet for that stuff.


Do you not find that many companies fail to respond to emails or online enquiry forms and the only way to get them to take any action is to telephone them?  Its either that or an email to the CEO and the main board directors if the customer call centre fails to  take the appropriate action I usually find.  But perhaps you have a wife or girlfriend to resolve all these domestic problems for you.

But many companies now have 084/7 numbers for normal business to business contact too.  They aren't just used for call centres.

I think you must be numerically dyslexic (whereas I am highly numerically literate and have a very good memory) and never notice what numbers you are dialling and never check your phone bill because you are so well paid it doesn't matter what the cost of the calls is to you.  I can't imagine a more inappropriate person therefore to be writing this report.

By the way I have no idea what LMAO means.  The fact that you are a text speaker and I am not probably says what different kinds of people we are.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jan 31st, 2007 at 10:26am by NGMsGhost »  

<div style=
 
IP Logged
 
derrick
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1,124
Re: 0870 vs. 0871
Reply #18 - Jan 31st, 2007 at 10:33am
 
NGMsGhost, LMAO =  Laughs My A***e Off  Wink
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lucaltmann
Newbie
*
Offline



Posts: 25
London
Gender: male
Re: 0870 vs. 0871
Reply #19 - Jan 31st, 2007 at 10:33am
 
Indeed NGN revenues do account for 29% of UK call revenues though the 084/7 share is less than 25% its GBP900 million out of a GBP5.6 billion  industry, i.e. 16%.

I do agree 0870/1 are overpriced, there does need to be some premium however to pay for the value added services for these numbers.

Interesting you mention the US do you see that as an exmaple of best practice and where else in Europe would you highlight as good practice on this issue.




Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
NGMsGhost
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


The Forum Ghost of NonGeographicalMan<b
r />

Posts: 2,720
Surrey, United Kingdom
Gender: male
Re: 0870 vs. 0871
Reply #20 - Jan 31st, 2007 at 10:55am
 
lucaltmann wrote on Jan 31st, 2007 at 10:33am:
I do agree 0870/1 are overpriced, there does need to be some premium however to pay for the value added services for these numbers.


But there aren't any voice value added services on 084/7 numbers that is the whole point.  They are just normal call centres and company switchboards formerly on 01/02  numbers.  The value added services are things like quiz tv prize lines, legal advice lines and sex chat lines (which no one has to call and there is lots of competition on) are all on 09 numbers.

Dial up is the only value added part of 0844/0845 but they could all be easily shunted on to another range without any issue.  Ofcom uses fast collapsing dialup as an excuse to hang on to 0844/5 revenue share for several years more to shore up this whole sad and deceitful industry.  Tell people it is an 09 call with a call price announcement that it is a higher rate with a payment to the company you are calling and no one running these lines will be able to get away with it any more.

Quote:
Interesting you mention the US do you see that as an exmaple of best practice and where else in Europe would you highlight as good practice on this issue.


Yes I do.

The odd American company operating in the UK, like MBNA the credit card operator, still sticks to the universal practice of offering 0800/800 numbers for all their UK points  of contact and organisations like John Lewis and Nationwide actively shun the use of 084/7 as much as possible because of their more consumer rights minded customer base.  The camera company Olympus even offers an 00 800 customer support line that can be called free from anywhere in the western world.

If 084/7 had not been missold on the deception of being normally priced calls due to a weak and corrupt regulator this scam industry would never have taken off.

09 calls clearly revealed as premium rate are a quite different consumer issue as they do not involve deception and misselling.

The other key issue is call queuing on 084/7 with people often having to queue for 30 minutest at £2.10 or £3.00 call value with no rules banning queuing (as there are on 09) and no indication of how long the call will be.  This incentivises call centres to understaff them and run them inefficiently to cut costs as much as possible while maximising call revenue.
Back to top
 

<div style=
 
IP Logged
 
kk
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 354
Gender: male
Re: 0870 vs. 0871
Reply #21 - Jan 31st, 2007 at 4:09pm
 
This should come after #22

I have sent a complaint to the FSA againt them (FSA) for doing nothing.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jan 31st, 2007 at 4:29pm by kk »  

KK
 
IP Logged
 
kk
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 354
Gender: male
Re: 0870 vs. 0871
Reply #22 - Jan 31st, 2007 at 4:15pm
 
I agree with all you say NGM, the whole 087x/084x scam is based on deception.

I have just received a 24 page booklet from Barclays Bank entitled “Overdraft Payment Protection”.  On the back cover, and printed in large blue type is the statement:
“Calls to 0870 numbers are charged at your national rate and calls to 0845 are charged at your local rate.”

The booklet appears to have been printed 11/06.

This is once again a clear false statement and is intended to mislead customers that calling 0870 and 0845 will cost customers no more than usual numbers beginning with 01/02.

Daytime calls to 0870 are usually charges between 7p to 10p/min and calls to 0845 cost between 3p to 5p/min.  Daytime calls to 01/02 numbers cost from 0p to 3p/min regardless of UK location or distance.  Calls to 084x/087x from mobiles and pay-phones are astronomical compared with 01/02.  A slice of the extra call cost goes to the Bank. The deception is clear.

If I stole money from the bank by deception I would end up in court.  The Banks steal millions from customers in clandestine telephone revenue, but the regulators do nothing.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jan 31st, 2007 at 4:20pm by kk »  

KK
 
IP Logged
 
NGMsGhost
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


The Forum Ghost of NonGeographicalMan<b
r />

Posts: 2,720
Surrey, United Kingdom
Gender: male
Re: 0870 vs. 0871
Reply #23 - Jan 31st, 2007 at 4:28pm
 
kk wrote on Jan 31st, 2007 at 4:15pm:
I have just received a 24 page booklet from Barclays Bank entitled “Overdraft Payment Protection”.  On the back cover, and printed in large blue type is the statement:
“Calls to 0870 numbers are charged at your national rate and calls to 0845 are charged at your local rate.”

The booklet appears to have been printed 11/06.

This is once again a clear false statement and is intended to mislead customers that calling 0870 and 0845 will cost customers no more than usual numbers beginning with 01/02.

If I stole money from the bank by deception I would end up in court.  The Banks steal millions from customers in clandestine telephone revenue, but the regulators do nothing.


kk

I am about to take NatWest to the Financial Services Ombudsman for their insistence that 0870 is National Rate in a deadlock letter from some cretinous woman in customer relations.

Can I suggest a three pronged attack against Barclays:-

(a) Scan the booklet and upload it along with your complaint at the ASA website.   As this is a marketing booklet for a product it is ASA regulated and Barclays shoud get an adjudication against them.

(b) If you can also pursue Barclays to send you a deadlock letter saying 0845 and 0870 are local rate and national rate and take your complaint to the Financial Services Ombusdman.  Unlike the ASA the FSO can impose financial penalties on companies for misselling.....  Of course Barclays will probably back off at higher level and say they realise there has been a mistake.

(c) Write to your MP and MEP citing this as an example of regulatory failure by Ofcom to exercise its powers under the Communcations Act 2003 to protect the citizien consumer and also its failure to enforce the EU Misleading Advertising Directive. Ideally you want to persuade your MP to have Ofcom's lethargy in this regard investigated by the Parliamentary Ombudsman.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jan 31st, 2007 at 4:29pm by NGMsGhost »  

<div style=
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
(Moderators: DaveM, Dave, Forum Admin, CJT-80, bbb_uk)

Website and Content © 1999-2024 SAYNOTO0870.COM. All Rights Reserved.
Written permission is required to duplicate any of the content within this site.

WARNING: This is an open forum, posts are NOT endorsed by SAYNOTO0870.COM,
please exercise due caution when acting on any info from here.


SAYNOTO0870.COM » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved.


Valid RSS Valid XHTML Valid CSS Powered by Perl Source Forge