Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
SAYNOTO0870.COM

<---- Back to main website

 
Home Help Search Login Register

Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
10DowningStreet's Cynical Response to Petition (Read 40,555 times)
NGMsGhost
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


The Forum Ghost of NonGeographicalMan<b
r />

Posts: 2,720
Surrey, United Kingdom
Gender: male
10DowningStreet's Cynical Response to Petition
May 21st, 2007 at 5:05pm
 
I have just received the following claptrap and utter tissue of lies by email from the 10 Downing Street Website in response to my signature to the now closed Petition Asking For an Alternative to all 084 and 087 Numbers.

Note that this response is not signed by Tony Blair, unlike the one giving good news about the Red Arrows, and basically represents the stock propaganda Ofcom line pretending it is doing something, when it is in fact doing everything in its power to make it as easy as possible for the 084/7 scammers to go on scamming.

Here it is in all its disgusting cynicalness.  Meanwhile Messrs Carter, Meek, Williams and Peacock ride off into the sunset to even higher paid salaries elsewhere and are totally unaccountable for their past total failure to serve the best interests of the UK citizen consumer regarding this matter. Shocked Angry Cry

Quote:
-----Original Message-----
From: 10 Downing Street [mailto:team@petitions.pm.gov.uk]
Sent: 21 May 2007 17:19
To: e-petition signatories
Subject: Government response to petition 'saynoto0870'

Government response to petition 'saynoto0870'

The e-petition asking the Prime Minister to "compel all organizations using non-geographic numbers (e.g. 0845, 087* prefixes) to also publicize an equivalent geographic number (e.g. 01* / 02* prefixes) where they can be reached (and which can usually be called more cheaply than an 0845 / 087* number)" has now closed. This is a response from the Government.

Thank you for the epetition about the use of non-geographic telephone numbers.

The first few digits of a UK telephone number are already intended to give a broad indication to the caller of the type of service and/or cost of the call. In general those numbers beginning 0870/0871 are the most expensive, 0844/45 in the middle range and 0800 Freephone free of charge.

There are various reasons why a company may choose to use an 08 number. It is for a company's own commercial judgement to decide what type of telephone number to use.

The independent Office of Communications (Ofcom) which is responsible for numbering policy, cannot dictate to companies what type of numbers they must use. Neither can they demand that they link their non-geographic numbers to a local number.

But Ofcom knows that consumers have concerns that 084 and 087 numbers are increasingly being used by businesses as a higher priced alternative to ordinary geographic telephone numbers. Ofcom undertook a major review of its policy on these numbers and last April published a statement setting out a package of consumer-friendly measures.

These include introducing a new range of 03 non-geographic numbers which will cost no more than geographic rates and restoring the link between the 0870 prefix and the actual rates charged by telecoms companies for national rate calls.

These new measures are being introduced over time so, for instance, the introduction of 03 numbers has already started and the alignment of 0870 costs with national rates will come into effect in January 2008. These measures should result in considerably lower prices for consumers. The website address for the Ofcom document is:

http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/nts_forward/statement

Ofcom is also extending the regulation of Premium Rate Numbers to 0871 numbers because of concerns that companies are increasingly using them and charging the caller much higher rates for services such as weather forecasts and sports' information. Consultation will take place this year but the main aim will be to ensure customers know how much it will cost them to call 0871 numbers.

You might also be re-assured to know that the Government advised two years ago all its departments and agencies against their own use of 0870 numbers.

By no means all Departments did use 0870 numbers, but where they did, they should now have been replaced with either geographical, 0845 (local rate) or 0800 numbers.

Further information
Subscribe to our newsletters
Prime Minister's Office homepage
Petition information
If you would like to opt out of receiving further mail on this or any other petitions you signed, please email optout@petitions.pm.gov.uk
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 21st, 2007 at 5:08pm by NGMsGhost »  

<div style=
 
IP Logged
 
loddon
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 599
Reading  UK
Gender: male
Re: 10 Downing Street Petition is Ofcom Tissue of
Reply #1 - May 21st, 2007 at 5:24pm
 
I wholeheartedly agree with your comments NGM.   This Government response is even more evasive, erroneous, misleading and annoying than we might have expected.

I  urge you now to write an open personal letter to the PM telling him what you think of the Response and what you think of Ofcom in relation to this matter.   I think the use of 087/084 by Government Departments and Agencies truly is immoral and unacceptable and they should certainly be compelled to publish their geographic numbers alongside.  The use of 0844 by Doctors is particularly distasteful and should be stopped immediately.
Back to top
 
Campaignagainstripofftelecoms  
IP Logged
 
NGMsGhost
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


The Forum Ghost of NonGeographicalMan<b
r />

Posts: 2,720
Surrey, United Kingdom
Gender: male
Re: 10 Downing Street Petition is Ofcom Tissue of
Reply #2 - May 21st, 2007 at 5:40pm
 
loddon wrote on May 21st, 2007 at 5:24pm:
 The use of 0844 by Doctors is particularly distasteful and should be stopped immediately.


Not to mention Patientline, which I now have personal experience of my mother unexpectedly being on the other end of in a situation where they were about to wheel her off to the theatre in a few minutes time.  That felt totally like extortion and blackmail and it is really horrible as if you complain about it to the ward sister or whatever you are then made to feel like Scrooge for complaining about a call that may cost £20 when for all you know your 72 year old mother may not come out of the general anaesthesia she is about to undergo for her operation.  Its truly shocking Patientline has not been stopped and the outgoing charges have now been doubled.
Back to top
 

<div style=
 
IP Logged
 
mikeinnc
Full Member
***
Offline


Ofcom - quis custodiet
ipsos custodes?

Posts: 225
Perth Western Australia
Gender: male
Re: 10DowningStreet's Cynical Response to Petition
Reply #3 - May 21st, 2007 at 10:19pm
 
Come on, NGM. be honest. Did you really expect anything else?  Sad

A bunch of oxygen thieves, all of them......
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 21st, 2007 at 10:20pm by mikeinnc »  
 
IP Logged
 
NGMsGhost
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


The Forum Ghost of NonGeographicalMan<b
r />

Posts: 2,720
Surrey, United Kingdom
Gender: male
Re: 10DowningStreet's Cynical Response to Petition
Reply #4 - May 21st, 2007 at 11:18pm
 
mikeinnc wrote on May 21st, 2007 at 10:19pm:
Come on, NGM. be honest. Did you really expect anything else?  Sad

A bunch of oxygen thieves, all of them......


Are you referring to Patientline or the Downing Street petition response? Huh
Back to top
 

<div style=
 
IP Logged
 
GrahamH
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 52
Re: 10DowningStreet's Cynical Response to Petition
Reply #5 - May 21st, 2007 at 11:25pm
 
Quote:
From: 10 Downing Street [mailto:team@petitions.pm.gov.uk]
Sent: 21 May 2007 17:19
To: e-petition signatories
Subject: Government response to petition 'saynoto0870'

By no means all Departments did use 0870 numbers, but where they did, they should now have been replaced with either geographical, 0845 (local rate) or 0800 numbers.


So now we have it from the Government itself - 0845 is local rate. No caveats, no "other tariffs may vary," no disclaimers. They've been taken in by the very lie whose existence they deny.

Dear Gordon/Tony

On BT option 1 - the most common tariff:

60 minutes to Penzance from Inverness on a proper 01 number at 7pm on a weekday costs 5.5p
60 minutes to an 0845 number at the same time on the same day costs 60p

How on earth can you then call 0845 be "local rate" if it's over 10 times more expensive than the longest distance call I can think of? And for anyone on a payphone, a mobile phone or a more cost effective tariff than BT, the differential is even greater.

Are you sure you're not lying again? (Please don't tell me you believed what OFCON told you...?)
Back to top
 

What's the point of 0845? Local rate my ar$e. Usually MORE than Inverness to Penzance on normal nos. Occasionally the same, never less!&&&&OFCOM - A Truly Great Regulator, if you're out to gouge consumers
 
IP Logged
 
NGMsGhost
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


The Forum Ghost of NonGeographicalMan<b
r />

Posts: 2,720
Surrey, United Kingdom
Gender: male
Re: 10DowningStreet's Cynical Response to Petition
Reply #6 - May 21st, 2007 at 11:32pm
 
GrahamH wrote on May 21st, 2007 at 11:25pm:
So now we have it from the Government itself - 0845 is local rate. No caveats, no "other tariffs may vary," no disclaimers. They've been taken in by the very lie whose existence they deny.

I missed that so well done for pointing it out.

This is an appalling error when 0845 is to become the main pariah hidden premium rate once 0870 is changed to geographic pricing for most calls (if of course it actually is).
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 21st, 2007 at 11:33pm by NGMsGhost »  

<div style=
 
IP Logged
 
Dave
Global Moderator
*****
Offline



Posts: 9,902
Yorkshire
Gender: male
Re: 10DowningStreet's Cynical Response to Petition
Reply #7 - May 22nd, 2007 at 7:09am
 
This response is a complete load of lies and spin. They have, of course, taken this in its literal meaning and defended the fact they "cannot dictate to companies what type of numbers they must use."

Say no to 0870 is not about banning premium numbers in principle, but about allowing the consumer to make a fair educated decision and not being lied to that this is "national rate".

It goes on to say that they cannot "demand that they link their non-geographic numbers to a local number." So how are 03 UK-wide Numbers going to work then?  Roll Eyes

Quote:
These new measures are being introduced over time so, for instance, the introduction of 03 numbers has already started and the alignment of 0870 costs with national rates will come into effect in January 2008.

I think they mean February 2008, or do they mean 32 January 2008?  Huh

Quote:
Ofcom is also extending the regulation of Premium Rate Numbers to 0871 numbers because of concerns that companies are increasingly using them and charging the caller much higher rates for services such as weather forecasts and sports' information.

"Much higher" than what? If pricing information was clear, then we would all know where we stand.

Quote:
Consultation will take place this year but the main aim will be to ensure customers know how much it will cost them to call 0871 numbers.

The consultation was published last month. So when was this written? What about other 0870 and 084 numbers then?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mikemundy
Newbie
*
Offline



Posts: 30
Re: Hall of Shame: Companies changing numbers
Reply #8 - May 22nd, 2007 at 10:10am
 



Note the last paragraph of this email I received yesterday from 10 Downing Street. Obviously the Prime Minister never rings the DVLA!

/\/\ike

Thank you for the epetition about the use of non-geographic telephone numbers.

The first few digits of a UK telephone number are already intended to give a broad indication to the caller of the type of service and/or cost of the call. In general those numbers beginning 0870/0871 are the most expensive, 0844/45 in the middle range and 0800 Freephone free of charge.

There are various reasons why a company may choose to use an 08 number. It is for a company's own commercial judgement to decide what type of telephone number to use.

The independent Office of Communications (Ofcom) which is responsible for numbering policy, cannot dictate to companies what type of numbers they must use. Neither can they demand that they link their non-geographic numbers to a local number.

But Ofcom knows that consumers have concerns that 084 and 087 numbers are increasingly being used by businesses as a higher priced alternative to ordinary geographic telephone numbers. Ofcom undertook a major review of its policy on these numbers and last April published a statement setting out a package of consumer-friendly measures.

These include introducing a new range of 03 non-geographic numbers which will cost no more than geographic rates and restoring the link between the 0870 prefix and the actual rates charged by telecoms companies for national rate calls.

These new measures are being introduced over time so, for instance, the introduction of 03 numbers has already started and the alignment of 0870 costs with national rates will come into effect in January 2008. These measures should result in considerably lower prices for consumers. The website address for the Ofcom document is:

http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/nts_forward/statement

Ofcom is also extending the regulation of Premium Rate Numbers to 0871 numbers because of concerns that companies are increasingly using them and charging the caller much higher rates for services such as weather forecasts and sports' information. Consultation will take place this year but the main aim will be to ensure customers know how much it will cost them to call 0871 numbers.

You might also be re-assured to know that the Government advised two years ago all its departments and agencies against their own use of 0870 numbers.

By no means all Departments did use 0870 numbers, but where they did, they should now have been replaced with either geographical, 0845 (local rate) or 0800 numbers
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dave
Global Moderator
*****
Offline



Posts: 9,902
Yorkshire
Gender: male
Re: 10DowningStreet's Cynical Response to Petition
Reply #9 - May 22nd, 2007 at 10:45am
 
Quote:
The independent Office of Communications (Ofcom) which is responsible for numbering policy, cannot dictate to companies what type of numbers they must use. Neither can they demand that they link their non-geographic numbers to a local number.

And it goes on to say "0845 (local rate)". These two points contradict one another.  Huh

Or when they say "link", do they mean link that telephone numbers rather than call rate? In which case, it is the 08x number that is "linked" to the 01/02 number and not the other way around.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
farci
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 190
Glasgow
Gender: male
Re: 10DowningStreet's Cynical Response to Petition
Reply #10 - May 22nd, 2007 at 10:49am
 
Dave wrote on May 22nd, 2007 at 10:45am:
Quote:
The independent Office of Communications (Ofcom) which is responsible for numbering policy, cannot dictate to companies what type of numbers they must use. Neither can they demand that they link their non-geographic numbers to a local number.

And it goes on to say "0845 (local rate)". These two points contradict one another.  Huh

Or when they say "link", do they mean link that telephone numbers rather than call rate? In which case, it is the 08x number that is "linked" to the 01/02 number and not the other way around.


I just e-mailed a reply pointing out the 0845 error and demanding a correction - if we all do this it might give them something to think about.

Or am I being naive Undecided
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Maxadolf
Newbie
*
Offline



Posts: 26
Re: 10DowningStreet's Cynical Response to Petition
Reply #11 - May 22nd, 2007 at 11:17am
 
farci wrote on May 22nd, 2007 at 10:49am:
Dave wrote on May 22nd, 2007 at 10:45am:
Quote:
The independent Office of Communications (Ofcom) which is responsible for numbering policy, cannot dictate to companies what type of numbers they must use. Neither can they demand that they link their non-geographic numbers to a local number.

And it goes on to say "0845 (local rate)". These two points contradict one another.  Huh

Or when they say "link", do they mean link that telephone numbers rather than call rate? In which case, it is the 08x number that is "linked" to the 01/02 number and not the other way around.


I just e-mailed a reply pointing out the 0845 error and demanding a correction - if we all do this it might give them something to think about.

Or am I being naive Undecided

:exclamation
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Maxadolf
Newbie
*
Offline



Posts: 26
Re: 10DowningStreet's Cynical Response to Petition
Reply #12 - May 22nd, 2007 at 11:30am
 
Note that the patronising response from 10 Downing Street contained several lies and inaccuracies  -  but what else would you expect of the ultimater twister of facts by a PM in living memory?   For example, the PM is accountable for this blatant lie which is that government agencies have ben instructed not to use 0870 numbers.  What a laugh!  If you at this time attempt to download a land title from the Land Registry and there are problems  of their making, or you need clarification about their system, you need to phone an 0870 number.   Similarly if, when you receive your invitation to renew your TV licence you take up their offer of paying by Direct Debit, you need to phone them on  an 0870 number to set it up.  The bare-faced cheek of these parasites whose  salaries are paid by us and who know nowt about value for money, defies comprehension.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
NGMsGhost
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


The Forum Ghost of NonGeographicalMan<b
r />

Posts: 2,720
Surrey, United Kingdom
Gender: male
Re: 10DowningStreet's Cynical Response to Petition
Reply #13 - May 22nd, 2007 at 11:45am
 
[quote author=Maxadolf link=1179767154/0#12 date=1179833423]Note that the patronising response from 10 Downing Street contained several lies and inaccuracies  -  but what else would you expect of the ultimater twister of facts by a PM in living memory?   For example, the PM is accountable for this blatant lie which is that government agencies have ben instructed not to use 0870 numbers.  What a laugh!  If you at this time attempt to download a land title from the Land Registry and there are problems  of their making, or you need clarification about their system, you need to phone an 0870 number.   Similarly if, when you receive your invitation to renew your TV licence you take up their offer of paying by Direct Debit, you need to phone them on  an 0870 number to set it up.  The bare-faced cheek of these parasites whose  salaries are paid by us and who know nowt about value for money, defies comprehension.[/quote]

Maxafold.  I agree with everything you say.  How did you take so long to find us in view of your commitment to the anti 084/7 cause.

Unfortunately the New Labour government is one of the main causes of the whole 084/7 movement with several important New Labour business friends (one of whom got a peerage out of it) behind it.

The only way to get anywhere is for each of us to raise the matter with our MPs and MEPS and get our MPs to refer it to the Parliamentary Ombudsman (to whom Ofcom are accountable) for investigation and to the EU Commission and the Competition Commission for further investigation.

10 Downing Street, Ofcom and ICSTIS will all ignore us and our letters as they are all utterly complicit in and secretely supportive of the whole 084/7 ripoff industry, whatever they may publicly pretend to the contrary.
Back to top
 

<div style=
 
IP Logged
 
Maxadolf
Newbie
*
Offline



Posts: 26
Re: 10DowningStreet's Cynical Response to Petition
Reply #14 - May 22nd, 2007 at 12:17pm
 
Hi NGMsGhost,

Thanks for the welcome!   About a year ago my son was suffering intense ear bashing from me because his company, a well known Bank, kept me waiting for 20 minutes on an 0870 no, a call that I had to make in order to register for the on-line banking facility.  He caved in by getting the department to phone me back under threat of my removing a substantial sum of my investments elsewhere (that always helps!).  He then drew my attention to the guy who set up the 'saynoto0870.com' and I've been benefiting fom his initiative ever since.  The guy deserves a gold medal!   As you know, the site were involved in the No 10 DS petition to which I responded and was severely insulted by the extremely offensive  and patronising reply sent out by No 10 to all participants.  I did send an equally offensive note to No 10 which  went part of the way to sublimating my anger at the misrepresentations, lies and half-truths, with no attempt to remove the corrupt system without installing a similar one to replace it.   But that's Bliar for you.

Now I'm registered with SNT0870, I'll get involved in the debates if and when something crops up to generate a red mist!

I would raise one new issue at this time.   Why is it that grafted telecommunication providers, such as Tiscali and One-Tel, cannot offer the 0450 numbers, which allegedly are at a local charge rate, as part of their "free" access numbers?  I can see why that can't be done with 0870 (because of the inbuilt back-handers to the users), but 0450s do not provide for such back-handers as I understand it.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
(Moderators: bbb_uk, Forum Admin, Dave, DaveM, CJT-80)

Website and Content © 1999-2024 SAYNOTO0870.COM. All Rights Reserved. (DE)
Written permission is required to duplicate any of the content within this site.

WARNING: This is an open forum, posts are NOT endorsed by SAYNOTO0870.COM,
please exercise due caution when acting on any info from here.


SAYNOTO0870.COM » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved.


Valid RSS Valid XHTML Valid CSS Powered by Perl Source Forge