Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
SAYNOTO0870.COM

<---- Back to main website

 
Home Help Search Login Register

Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
10DowningStreet's Cynical Response to Petition (Read 40,394 times)
Dave
Global Moderator
*****
Offline



Posts: 9,902
Yorkshire
Gender: male
Re: 10DowningStreet's Cynical Response to Petition
Reply #15 - May 22nd, 2007 at 2:54pm
 
Maxadolf wrote on May 22nd, 2007 at 1:17pm:
… Why is it that grafted telecommunication providers, such as Tiscali and One-Tel, cannot offer the 0450 numbers, which allegedly are at a local charge rate, as part of their "free" access numbers?  I can see why that can't be done with 0870 (because of the inbuilt back-handers to the users), but 0450s do not provide for such back-handers as I understand it.

I presume that when you say "0450", you are referring to 0845 numbers.

The issues that surround to 0870 also surround 0845 to a lesser degree. But in principle they should be done away with as they are at the moment because the foundation that they have been built on is "local rate". Similarly, 0870 has been known as "national rate".

The very reason that these 0845 numbers cannot be included in inclusive minutes and often cost more than a call to an 01/02 number where these calls are chargeable is because they do have so-called micro-payments. It is more common to find that this is not shared with the receiving party with 0845 than 0870, but the telco providing the NGN does charge more than for 01/02.

Have a look at some of the pages linked to from Useful Information & Say no to 0870! Hot Topics.
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 22nd, 2007 at 2:54pm by Dave »  
 
IP Logged
 
NGMsGhost
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


The Forum Ghost of NonGeographicalMan<b
r />

Posts: 2,720
Surrey, United Kingdom
Gender: male
Re: 10DowningStreet's Cynical Response to Petition
Reply #16 - May 22nd, 2007 at 3:20pm
 
Dave wrote on May 22nd, 2007 at 2:54pm:
I presume that when you say "0450", you are referring to 0845 numbers.


Or is the OP referring to the 05 Voip number ranges I wonder.  Again these should be classed as geographic calls from a landline but due to greed and stupidity are not.
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 22nd, 2007 at 4:25pm by NGMsGhost »  

<div style=
 
IP Logged
 
Maxadolf
Newbie
*
Offline



Posts: 26
Re: 10DowningStreet's Cynical Response to Petition
Reply #17 - May 22nd, 2007 at 3:57pm
 
EmbarrassedDave and NGMsGhost,

Many thanks for your helpful reply.  You're right, I did mean 0845: my mistake!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
kk
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 354
Gender: male
Re: 10DowningStreet's Cynical Response to Petition
Reply #18 - May 22nd, 2007 at 8:06pm
 
0845 costs the same as 0870 from a call box and both cost much more than 01 or 02.

Last year 0845 and 0870 both cost 10p for every 55 seconds or less from a BT call box.
Back to top
 

KK
 
IP Logged
 
bill
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 193
Re: 10DowningStreet's Cynical Response to Petition
Reply #19 - May 22nd, 2007 at 8:11pm
 
kk wrote on May 22nd, 2007 at 8:06pm:
0845 costs the same as 0870 from a call box and both cost much more than 01 or 02.

Last year 0845 and 0870 both cost 10p for every 55 seconds or less from a BT call box.

See http://www.saynoto0870.com/cgi-bin/forum/YaBB.cgi?num=1168434954 (post #6).
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 22nd, 2007 at 8:12pm by bill »  
 
IP Logged
 
kk
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 354
Gender: male
Re: 10DowningStreet's Cynical Response to Petition
Reply #20 - May 22nd, 2007 at 10:01pm
 
Bill - Thanks for the link.

As you can see from the link,  0845 and 0870 cost about 11 times more than 01 or 02.  Another reason to abolish 0845 and 0870.

Maybe the PM does not use a phone box - just the voters.
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 22nd, 2007 at 10:08pm by kk »  

KK
 
IP Logged
 
NGMsGhost
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


The Forum Ghost of NonGeographicalMan<b
r />

Posts: 2,720
Surrey, United Kingdom
Gender: male
Re: 10DowningStreet's Cynical Response to Petition
Reply #21 - May 22nd, 2007 at 10:14pm
 
kk wrote on May 22nd, 2007 at 10:01pm:
Maybe the PM does not use a phone box - just the voters.


Tony may get a shock after he leaves office and he no longer has a government funded satellite or mobile phone always to hand.

I wonder how much a call to an 084 or 087 number from a satellite phone costs compared to a call to an 01 or 02? Wink Shocked
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 22nd, 2007 at 10:15pm by NGMsGhost »  

<div style=
 
IP Logged
 
GrahamH
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 52
Re: 10DowningStreet's Cynical Response to Petition
Reply #22 - May 23rd, 2007 at 12:24am
 
Unfortunately, once he leaves office, said satellite/mobile phone will still be paid for by you and I - this time through some Telco providing him with a free one, on the back of profits from 084/087 calls.

Just to rub salt in, doubtless he'll be off round the world telling everyone what a wonderful idea it was to create OFCON
Back to top
 

What's the point of 0845? Local rate my ar$e. Usually MORE than Inverness to Penzance on normal nos. Occasionally the same, never less!&&&&OFCOM - A Truly Great Regulator, if you're out to gouge consumers
 
IP Logged
 
Barbara
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 598
Re: 10DowningStreet's Cynical Response to Petition
Reply #23 - May 29th, 2007 at 3:22pm
 
Well, I am astonished!   Neither my husband nor I (who both signed this epetition as well as some others on the site) have had the courtesy of ANY response from Downing Street (to ANY of the epetitions signed)- what have we done (except perhaps be the wrong political colour?!)   That, to me, as much as the "inaccuracies" (strongest I dare use - in the Blair/Brown suveillance society you never know who's monitoring your messages!!) in the posted response, is an indication of the total contempt with which this Government treats citizens and, of course, that attitude filters down through all staff in all departments and provides absolutely no incentive whatsoever for civil servants to put the individual at the centre of their way of working.   I really do despair at times as there seems an impenetrable web making it impossible for anything to be changed unless it is the expressed will of the government.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
NGMsGhost
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


The Forum Ghost of NonGeographicalMan<b
r />

Posts: 2,720
Surrey, United Kingdom
Gender: male
Re: 10DowningStreet's Cynical Response to Petition
Reply #24 - May 29th, 2007 at 3:33pm
 
Barbara wrote on May 29th, 2007 at 3:22pm:
That, to me, as much as the "inaccuracies" (strongest I dare use - in the Blair/Brown suveillance society you never know who's monitoring your messages!!) in the posted response, is an indication of the total contempt with which this Government treats citizens and, of course, that attitude filters down through all staff in all departments and provides absolutely no incentive whatsoever for civil servants to put the individual at the centre of their way of working.


Barbara,

The most likely explanation is that it was filtered by your ISP as being Spam and is probably sitting in the Spam bucket on your ISP's webmail server if you can log in and see what mails are in that (mainly mails about Viagra and supposed bargain shares)

As to the surveillance society they simply haven't got enough staff available to be reading every email sent and things are not yet as bad as the old Soviet Union and Eastern Block (who used more labour intensive methods). Although give control freaks Tony and Gordon time and it will become that bad.
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 29th, 2007 at 3:33pm by NGMsGhost »  

<div style=
 
IP Logged
 
loddon
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 599
Reading  UK
Gender: male
Re: 10DowningStreet's Cynical Response to Petition
Reply #25 - May 31st, 2007 at 12:02pm
 
I wonder how?  Why??

When the Petition closed it had accrued 42,957 signatories.  It now has 43,002!!!!

Keeps on growing!!  You can't keep a real issue down!!!
Back to top
 
Campaignagainstripofftelecoms  
IP Logged
 
NGMsGhost
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


The Forum Ghost of NonGeographicalMan<b
r />

Posts: 2,720
Surrey, United Kingdom
Gender: male
Re: 10DowningStreet's Cynical Response to Petition
Reply #26 - May 31st, 2007 at 12:17pm
 
loddon wrote on May 31st, 2007 at 12:02pm:
I wonder how?  Why??

When the Petition closed it had accrued 42,957 signatories.  It now has 43,002!!!!

Keeps on growing!!  You can't keep a real issue down!!!


People who received confirmation links while it was open and hadn't yet clicked them to validate their signature can still do so after the petition closes.  Five seems quite likley out of 43,000.
Back to top
 

<div style=
 
IP Logged
 
loddon
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 599
Reading  UK
Gender: male
Re: 10DowningStreet's Cynical Response to Petition
Reply #27 - May 31st, 2007 at 12:46pm
 
Thanks NGM for your explanation.

I calculate 45 new votes have been added since the Petition closing date.  I expect there will be a few more yet.
Back to top
 
Campaignagainstripofftelecoms  
IP Logged
 
NGMsGhost
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


The Forum Ghost of NonGeographicalMan<b
r />

Posts: 2,720
Surrey, United Kingdom
Gender: male
Re: 10DowningStreet's Cynical Response to Petition
Reply #28 - May 31st, 2007 at 1:48pm
 
loddon wrote on May 31st, 2007 at 12:46pm:
Thanks NGM for your explanation.

I calculate 45 new votes have been added since the Petition closing date.  I expect there will be a few more yet.


People may suddenly come across the confirmation email weeks later when they check out their email provider's online spam filtering box for their account.  Most people only check that once in a while and some don't even know it is there. Wink

Due to the number of emails the 10 Downing Street sends out and their standard format they could easily have been classified as Spam by some email providers.
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 31st, 2007 at 1:49pm by NGMsGhost »  

<div style=
 
IP Logged
 
Maxadolf
Newbie
*
Offline



Posts: 26
Re: 10DowningStreet's Cynical Response to Petition
Reply #29 - Jun 3rd, 2007 at 6:19pm
 
Another example of Bliar's spin where  he states in his response to the petition against 0870 numbers, that Government Departments have been instructed to provide alternate geographic numbers.  The invitation to renew your tax disc by phone gives the sole number as 0870 850 4444.   That's three  government agencies that I have needed to contact in recent weeks to renew or acquire something: Land Registry (for downloading land titles where there is a problem of their making), DVLA  for road tax by phone and  setting up a DD for TV Licence renewal.

If there was a law agin lying by politicians then Bliar would be given a life sentence for his numerous barefaced misrepresentations, some of which cost British lives!  The man is so out of touch with his job and has failed to listen to the electorate.  And even as I write, he is galavanting on a massive, overseas ego trip at tax-payers' expense whilst his successor avoids doing the job that he was crowned to do lest it upsets  the spin-doctor-in-chief during the "transition".   This country has become a rudderless liability because of the weakness of Brown and  the international joy-riding by a terminally incompetent and lying PM.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
(Moderators: Forum Admin, Dave, DaveM, CJT-80, bbb_uk)

Website and Content © 1999-2024 SAYNOTO0870.COM. All Rights Reserved.
Written permission is required to duplicate any of the content within this site.

WARNING: This is an open forum, posts are NOT endorsed by SAYNOTO0870.COM,
please exercise due caution when acting on any info from here.


SAYNOTO0870.COM » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved.


Valid RSS Valid XHTML Valid CSS Powered by Perl Source Forge