sherbert wrote on Apr 21
st, 2009 at 3:29pm:
The cynic that I am, surley all this is typical Labour spin in action, taking the headlines off the more serious stuff that is going on in this wretched government. Will this (50 MPH propsal) ever get off the ground? Probably not, as the little darlings are taking 12 weeks off in the summer, (probably to try and spend some of their expenses before they get caught out), so what I am saying is, is there enough time for the reviews, consultations, and passing it through both houses of parliamnet before the next general election? Labour are very clever at making the headlines that they want. On another note I see Hazel Blears 'did a Bob Quick' and the press saw the information about reforming the expenses before dear Gordon announced it in the Mother of Parliaments. i.e. You Tube.
I personally believe the vast majority of motorists are against this proposal (and the even worse one for 20mph in all residential areas) but Labour has a lot more supporters who don't drive (due to city location and income) than the Tories and this nonsense sounds good with those people who in the main don't understand the issues in the way a driver who has experience of these speeds do.
Labour is obsessively anti car due to its links with personal liberty and the more it can control the car and try to make using one such a horrid experience (as you are a potential criminal the minute you drive away) the better it likes it. There are a few control freak nutters in the Police and local councils, not to mention the real nutters at Brake and Roadpeace, and they have Labour's ear while the motorist and the Association of British Drivers does not. The loonies in the camera partnerships known that the Tories with lots of car drivers in rural areas among their voters will never agree to this nonsense when they get in to power and so are desperate to push it through now as they know that rescinding this stuff is a lot harder once it has happened.
Cameron is pretty weak on all this with his tory toff Notting Hill bicycling nonsense (while followed by security men in cars) but the majority of real Conservatives oppose the constant war on the motorist. Needless to say namby pamby Clegg probably supports all of this stuff. Charles Kennedy might have been more sensible.