Bradders wrote on Aug 3
rd, 2007 at 5:38pm:
I seem to remember that when 0845 numbers were introduced, they were hailed as local 'regardless of caller's location'. Have the rules changed, or was it missold in the first place.
Read my post
What's the problem with 0845/0870 numbers? Put simply, there's two telcos involved; the one originating the call (eg BT, Talk Talk, Tiscali, Sky Talk etc) and the one that provides the NGN (non-geographical number) or 0845. Originally, BT had to originate the call for the price of a local call (and 0870 for national call rate) and it was allowed to retain, on a cost basis, payment for carrying the call. All the rest is passed to the NGN provider. Thus, loads of 'telcos' have sprung up that provide these numbers. They, of course, don't have an interest in lowering the charges they make to originating providers. Hence, 0845/0870 has remained, broadly speaking, as it always has.
Bradders wrote on Aug 3
rd, 2007 at 5:38pm:
Also, given the huge penetration (BT speak for takeup) of mobiles, its high time that all published numbers gave call cost information for these as well as landlines.
This was covered by a consultation from Ofcom last year. The conclusion was that telcos should provide clear pricing information on NGNs, as they do geographicals (01/02). Despite this, telcos continue to ignore this. The worst offender, by far, is T-Mobile, discussed
here.