http://www.ofcom.org.uk/telecoms/groups/nts_focus/notes/nts20070607NTS Focus Group – 21st June 2007 – 2.00 pm Ofcom
Agenda item (1) - Introductions
Attendance:
Andrew Wileman
Virgin Media (Chair)
Fraser Douglas
Band-X
Kath Embleton
BT
Sean Hartley
BT
Becky Hewlett
Cable & Wireless
Laurent Pariat
Cable & Wireless
Andrew Monk
Carphone Warehouse
Toby Higho
Easynet/Sky
Will Goodall
Flextel
Tom Cairns
Gamma
Andy Martin
IV Response
Geoff Brighton
Ofcom
Clive Hillier
Ofcom
Nick Morris
Ofcom
Dirmuid Jennings
Reality Telecom
John Lockyer
Teamphone
Colin Scott
Thus
Michael Barford
Tiscali
Anne McCardle
Verizon Business
Sandra Reid
Virgin Media
Agenda Item (2): Review of minutes of previous meeting
No comments/concerns were raised. It was therefore agreed that the minutes could be published on the Ofcom website.
Agenda (3): Update/progress report on the current 'live' NTS related consultations/investigations: (Ofcom/All)
Review of Regulation of Premium Rate Services
Clive Hillier advised that the review is currently in the research phase. Consumer research was underway, with survey results being evaluated. A feasibility study on a potential PRS provider registration scheme had been completed. Clive added that the international comparison study was ongoing, and that the project team are considering the implications of the Ayre report (into the use of PRS in television programmes) on the project. A consultation is scheduled for the Autumn of 2007.
NCCN 500 investigation/NTS call termination market review
Clive Hillier said that the legal review of the conclusions of the NCCN 500 investigation had been concluded, with the document having been passed to the Ofcom Policy Executive for final sign off. The Executive had raised one minor query, which would necessitate another submission to the Executive. Clive added that Ofcom intended to publish its findings to the specific parties to the dispute within the next few weeks.
The call termination market review remains on hold, pending the outcome of the NCCN 500 investigation.
ICSTIS progress re. Governance of 0871
Geoff Brighton said that Ofcom had met with UKCTA and had listened to concerns that the proposed regulations were disproportionate. Attendees were advised that Ofcom had also met with ICSTIS to relay the concerns of UKCTA. Andy Martin sought clarity on Ofcom’s concerns. Geoff said that Ofcom had echoed industry concerns about how the proposed pre-registration scheme and some other aspects may be regarded as potentially too stringent given the lower value of 0871 calls when compared with PRS. Geoff added that Ofcom was not seeking to influence ICSTIS at this stage, but had instead acted as a conduit via which views could be highlighted. Andy Martin asked if Ofcom would be responding to the ICSTIS consultation. Geoff said that this was not clear at present, but confirmed that Ofcom would need to approve the ICSTIS Code of Practice for 0871.
General Condition 14 Enforcement Programme
Clive Hillier confirmed that Ofcom had now responded to Will Goodall's letter. Attendees were informed that no investigations were taking place at present, but monitoring of compliance with GC14 remained ongoing. Will Goodall said that any improvement in price transparency would be good for the industry and would highlight the instances in which he perceived that certain CPs were overcharging. Will said that Flextel’s ultimate desire was to see the implementation of call price labelling.
BT POLO Dispute (1 st October 2006 OCCNs)
Attendees were informed that Ofcom had published its final Determination in respect of the 1 st Oct 2006 OCCN POLO dispute on 4 th June. Kath Embleton said that no pricing letters would be issued – the prices would simply be implemented into the Carrier Price List and BT billing system. Becky Hewlett asked why there would be no pricing letters. Nick Morris said that the Ofcom Determination did not require a pricing letter, effectively constituting a pricing letter of itself. Colin Scott asked how this could be, since the rates quoted in the relevant section of the Determination were BT retail rates. Becky Hewlett said that actual POLO rates should be quoted if this ‘absence of pricing letter’ approach was to be adopted. Becky added that she did not believe the current arrangement would constitute an appropriate basis via which to bring the rates into contractual effect.
Kath Embleton said that BT was not intending to issue pricing letters as many CPs would likely reject them again. A discussion followed around the various potential options that could be employed to ensure that the implementation of the directed rates was sufficient from a contractual perspective.
After reviewing several approaches, the group reached a general consensus that
Ofcom would issue a clarification note, making clear the situation in respect of the NTS POLO outpayments and stating that it does not expect BT to have to seek CPs’ agreement to implement the rates resulting from the Determination. In conjunction with this, BT would write to CPs stating that the Ofcom determination was binding, and specifying the rates that would be applied, together with the method of application.
...