Dave wrote on Apr 18
th, 2010 at 8:46pm:
Judging by the negativity that
you seem to be ensuing, then perhaps you should look at the
Hall of Fame.
They may have taught English differently in your day Dave but I really don't think that my English teacher would not have given me any marks for the above sentence.
In any even the Hall of Fame Public Sector list is still rather depressingly small compared to those in the public sector who should have changed but have bloody mindely refused to take any steps at all towards such an action.
You also remind me to re-pursue Surrey Police where they made a variety of attempts at what seemed like quite deliberate initial obfuscation of my enquiry but then their head of FOI finally said in an email that he would send me my requested information of all internal reports that justified their original use of 0845 and its subsequent retention and information on any evaluation they had done of the costs of switching to 03. Only to then still not send me the information he had faithfully promised me in writing.
I suspect that actually putting a question down for and then turning up at the next meeting of Surrey Police Authority and asking why Surrey Police is still holding out on this information might get rather more results than the seemingly futile attempts to deal by correspondence with their apparently deliberately unhelpful FOI section (of course there are theoretically appeals to the ICO but those are usually frustrating and lengthy too). Their original ludicrous stock reason for refusing my request was that it would require them to examine all their custody records over the last several years.