Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
SAYNOTO0870.COM

<---- Back to main website

 
Home Help Search Login Register

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
National Trust (article in magazine) (Read 25,622 times)
Barbara
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 598
National Trust (article in magazine)
Oct 11th, 2007 at 11:01am
 
Hi, I have lost touch a bit as I have been away but cannot find any recent post on this.   The following item appeared on p15 of the Autumn 2007 issue of the National Trust Magazine under "In short" column 2:

"From next February, in response to members' feedback - and OFCOM regulations - the Membership Department is changing from an 0870 number to a cheaper-to-call 0844 number.   This comes into effect from February 2008; look out for the new number in your spring magazine."

Now, obviously, this is totally misleading in my understanding as I thought from Feb 08, 0870 would become like an 01/02 number and 0844 anyway is always charged at a high standard (ie doesn't change with times/days) rate (hence premium).  Also, I hold no brief for OFCOM but to blame their "regulations" is absolutely outrageous, it is the National Trust wanting to continue with scamming its customers that is the real reason behind this change!  (Prior to finding this item, I had been thinking, oh good, their numbers should be included in my call package from Feb!!)

Obviously, I will be contacting them, their magazine editor and membership and anyone else there I can find to protest both about their decision and their misrepresentation of the facts BUT, before I do this, I would appreciate it if someone more knowledgeable than me can confirm that I have my facts correct.   Also, it would be good if as many forum members as possible could bombard the National Trust as it might make them realise that some of us are not so stupid as they think!

My complaint is going to be based on the fact that, 1) from Feb 08, 0870 would become charged as geographical so would not be a premium rate to customers, 2) that 0844 is ALWAYS premium rate to customers so the change will NOT answer members' feedback (ie complaints!) and 3) that they are totally incorrect over OFCOM regulations.

I was also going to pass the details to OFCOM as they may have some views about taking the blame for something which, for once, is not their fault!

I await your comments.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lompos
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 791
Re: National Trust (article in magazine)
Reply #1 - Oct 11th, 2007 at 4:38pm
 
Welcome back

In the database there are lots of geogprahic numbers for the NT, including one for the Membership Dept. This of course shouldn't diminish the rightful anger about what NT are proposing to do.

Quote:
Obviously, I will be contacting them, their magazine editor and membership and anyone else there I can find to protest


Please provide email addresses so that others can do the same. Threatening non-renewal of membership would be a good idea to try to influence them into abandoning the proposed change.

Quote:
0844 is ALWAYS premium rate


0844 is always premium rate but the price varies and without NT publishing their new 0844 number there is no way of knowing how much it will cost.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dave
Global Moderator
*****
Offline



Posts: 9,902
Yorkshire
Gender: male
Re: National Trust (article in magazine)
Reply #2 - Oct 11th, 2007 at 5:25pm
 
Contact management, details are here.

National Trust email addresses appear to be firstname.lastname@nationaltrust.org.uk
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Heinz
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1,362
Essex
Re: National Trust (article in magazine)
Reply #3 - Oct 11th, 2007 at 5:36pm
 
So, that piece should have read:

"From next February, in response to
a loss of ability to continue ripping members off with a disguised premium rate phone number as a result of
OFCOM regulations, the Membership Department is changing from an 0870 number
(on which revenue-sharing ceases in February 2008)
to a cheaper-to-call 0844 number
(well, it'll be cheaper than the 0870 number is now but it'll be more expensive than the 0870 number will be then)
.   This comes into effect from February 2008; look out for the new number in your spring magazine."

National Trust - isn't that an oxymoron?

Anyone want to hazard a guess at which 0844 rate they'll choose?  My money's (pardon the pun) on 5p//minute at all times.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 11th, 2007 at 5:45pm by Heinz »  

After years of ignoring govt. guidelines & RIPPING OFF Council Tax payers using 0845 numbers, Essex County Council changed to 0345 numbers on 2 November 2015
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Dave
Global Moderator
*****
Offline



Posts: 9,902
Yorkshire
Gender: male
Re: National Trust (article in magazine)
Reply #4 - Oct 11th, 2007 at 5:43pm
 
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Barbara
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 598
Re: National Trust (article in magazine)
Reply #5 - Oct 17th, 2007 at 9:36am
 
Thanks for the input to all who responded.   Have looked at the old thread and agre fully.  One thing about which I am not certain is the email address format as, on their website, it seems to be "@thenationaltrust.org.uk", I think it is Dave who quoted the format as "firstname.lastname@nationaltrust.org.uk" ie no "the" and their address as given in the magazine for the editor is "magazine@nationaltrust.org.uk" so I will have to try various formats & will post here which ones work.   I am going to start with the Director General and the Editor (as well as OFCOM, maybe they will take an interest as it is their reputation at stake as well - yes, I know what forum members already think of them but these bodies often believe they are really popular!) then move on to the Board of Trustees if I get no proper response & once I have cracked the email format (list on NT website).

As for not renewing our membership, we have just renewed on the basis that we have saved far, far more in admission fees than the membership cost us so feel we are redressing the balace a little.  However, they really annoy me and we have resigned our membership in the past (also this eco warrior nonsense etc).
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
farci
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 190
Glasgow
Gender: male
Re: National Trust (article in magazine)
Reply #6 - Oct 17th, 2007 at 10:44pm
 
Barbara wrote on Oct 17th, 2007 at 9:36am:
Thanks for the input to all who responded.   Have looked at the old thread and agre fully.  One thing about which I am not certain is the email address format as, on their website, it seems to be "@thenationaltrust.org.uk", I think it is Dave who quoted the format as "firstname.lastname@nationaltrust.org.uk" ie no "the" and their address as given in the magazine for the editor is "magazine@nationaltrust.org.uk" so I will have to try various formats & will post here which ones work.   I am going to start with the Director General and the Editor (as well as OFCOM, maybe they will take an interest as it is their reputation at stake as well - yes, I know what forum members already think of them but these bodies often believe they are really popular!) then move on to the Board of Trustees if I get no proper response & once I have cracked the email format (list on NT website).

As for not renewing our membership, we have just renewed on the basis that we have saved far, far more in admission fees than the membership cost us so feel we are redressing the balace a little.  However, they really annoy me and we have resigned our membership in the past (also this eco warrior nonsense etc).

Good on ya' - sorry to say National Trust Scotland also went t0 0844 without notice - let us know how you get on...!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Barbara
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 598
Re: National Trust (article in magazine)
Reply #7 - Oct 18th, 2007 at 11:02am
 
Update as promised.   I sent my email to Fiona Reynolds both with & without "the" & neither was returned as undelivered so I assume either format works.

Secondly, I have received a response from the magazine editor, Sue Herdman, saying she has passed my complaint to the membership department which is fair enough.   However, I also replied that I would like to submit my letter for publication so that ALL readers are aware of the situation.....!   I wonder if they will print it?!  (Think this needs a smiley but couldn't decide which!)
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
nanstallon
Newbie
*
Offline



Posts: 23
Falmouth
Gender: male
Re: National Trust (article in magazine)
Reply #8 - Oct 26th, 2007 at 8:15pm
 
I don't get quite so angry when a good cause like NT does this.  It's a bit sneaky, but not as bad as a commercial business screwing its customers.

NT membership has always been good value, and threatening to resign or not renew is a bit like cutting off your nose to spite your face.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Barbara
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 598
Re: National Trust (article in magazine)
Reply #9 - Oct 29th, 2007 at 7:01pm
 
UPDATE.   This afternoon, I had a telephone call from a member of staff in the Customer Care Dept (nothing yet from Fiona Reynolds) who had been passed my email by the magazine editor.  The lady who rang had been briefed by the Head of Customer Care & asked to ring me with "the facts".   Firstly, I was told that when NT had first started with 0870, they had been "caught short" with the number with problems which "were not of (NT's) making and left stranded".   She continued that, financially, they cannot provide the telephone system any other way, they make a very small income from 0870.   She, personally, tries to take a broader view &, out of their 3.5 million members, has had very few complaints about 0870 [this was contradicted by what was in the magazine item and she admitted that some members had complained and resigned their membership when I pressed her re the thread on this forum].  She emphasised people could always write or email (I pointed out they have many older members who are less likely to have email, also people have already paid membership &, possibly, a phone package - why should they pay again to phone or write?)

I asked why they did not make a geo alternative available, giving people a choice, drawing reference to COI guidelines which, while not relevant as such to NT, did indicate that there was strong feeling against ngns.   She stated that they won't make geo alternatives available for "technical reasons" but could not say what these were.  She also cited this as why they were going for 0844, I pointed out that most if not all advatanges were available on a geo no.

Oddly, when I asked about 03 numbers, she said they could not use them as they would have to pay to receive calls but was unable to give me any source for this statement, other than the head of Customer Care's briefing  and that it had "all been investigated at director level.   I really would appreciate comments from those more knowledgeable than I am on this point.

I did point out that it was not unknown for telcoms cos to be "economical with the truth" when trying to get their customers to sign up to particular systems (cf NEG & drs)!   I repeatedly pointed out that the only change happening in Feb 08 (?) was the end to revenue sharing on 0870 which would make a move to 0844 attractive - she believed this not to be the case & again, there were "technical reasons" decided at director level.

Basically, I think this lady had been set up to try & fob me off/pacify me having to rely on what she had been told.   Whether the directors etc really believe what they are saying, don't understand telecoms enough or are just adjusting the number to continue the rip-off from customers is a question which really needs answering.   I did repeatedly refer her to this site, she said she had not looked at it but a colleague had.

After 33 minutes, we had to agree to differ!  I did say I still expected a response from Fiona Reynolds & would be forwarding my complaint to the members of the Board of Trustees.  By the way, I did 1471 and the number which called me was 01793 817858.

I would appreciate any comments anyone has (also ref. to the thread about OFCOM backing down over the changes to 0870) as I really need some clarity on this beore I can proceed any further.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
bbb_uk
Global Moderator
*****
Offline



Posts: 2,041
Re: National Trust (article in magazine)
Reply #10 - Oct 29th, 2007 at 8:37pm
 
Barbara wrote on Oct 29th, 2007 at 7:01pm:
Oddly, when I asked about 03 numbers, she said they could not use them as they would have to pay to receive calls but was unable to give me any source for this statement, other than the head of Customer Care's briefing  and that it had "all been investigated at director level.
This is potentially true.

I use the word potentially because it's possible that a teleco may charge a very high monthly line rental and in return offer a limited number of minutes free (ie National Trust don't pay for any incoming calls for the first x minutes per month).

However, in most cases (if not all) I do believe that an incoming call charge will be payable for anyone receiving calls on an 03x number.

The reason for this is because these 03x numbers (like 08x) offer facilities like call routing, call queueing, stats, interactive voice prompts, etc.  These facilities (even basic call routing to an ordinary geographical 01/02 number) has to be paid for somehow and the money made by teleco's for calls to 03x is very little (if at all) so a charge is likely to be levied for calls National Trust (in this example) receive on an 03x.

0844 (well most), 0845, 087x numbers are charged more than 01/02 and 03x numbers and the extra money made may mean that facilities such as call routing is free simply because the extra cost it costs us consumers for the call pays for it.

This all varies depending on the supplier (teleco) that the 03x number is rented from.  For example, some 0845 suppliers actually charge for incoming calls received whereas some don't charge for incoming calls received.

Barbara wrote on Oct 29th, 2007 at 7:01pm:
I pointed out that most if not all advatanges were available on a geo no.
That is true however this comes at a cost.  Things like PBX's, PBX maintenance, etc can cost a lot of money.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 29th, 2007 at 8:54pm by bbb_uk »  
 
IP Logged
 
idb
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1,499
Miami, Florida, United States
Gender: male
Re: National Trust (article in magazine)
Reply #11 - Oct 29th, 2007 at 10:44pm
 
Barbara wrote on Oct 29th, 2007 at 7:01pm:
UPDATE.   This afternoon, I had a telephone call from a member of staff in the Customer Care Dept (nothing yet from Fiona Reynolds) who had been passed my email by the magazine editor.  
Perhaps you could ask about those NT members who live overseas who will fnd it difficult or expensive to contact the membership department if it persists with NGNs. I am sure there are plenty of NT members who live outside the UK, although I am myself not one of them.

I find it difficult to take any UK organization seriously when it offers, as the only means of contact, a number that begins 07, 08 or 09, and I include 0800 and 0808 in this statement.  The exclusive use of such numbers demonstrates how the organization feels about me as either a customer or potential customer.

UK customer service has plummeted since I left Treasure Island.

I'm visiting briefly in December, and I expect to see billboards, newspapers, magazines, TV ads plastered with 0844 this and 0870 that.
Back to top
 

As from November 21, 2013, I no longer participate in the forum and am unable to receive private messages.
 
IP Logged
 
mikeinnc
Full Member
***
Offline


Ofcom - quis custodiet
ipsos custodes?

Posts: 225
Perth Western Australia
Gender: male
Re: National Trust (article in magazine)
Reply #12 - Oct 30th, 2007 at 3:06am
 
Quote:
I'm visiting briefly in December, and I expect to see billboards, newspapers, magazines, TV ads plastered with 0844 this and 0870 that.


..and I'm sure you will. I did a 'straw poll' of a British computer magazine I receive here in the USA, and about 85% of all advertisers - big and small - were using a 087x/084x number.

Looking at a similar American magazine shows about 95% of all advertisers using a 1-800 number.

Rather says a lot about who really wants me as a customer........  Angry
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Barbara
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 598
Re: National Trust (article in magazine)
Reply #13 - Oct 30th, 2007 at 9:18am
 
So, in light of the above comments, do I abandon my complaint?  If not, where do I go from here, bearing in mind I have received no resopnse from OFCOM after approx 10 days?  (It was made quite clear to me that NT deals with a majority or "broader" as they describe it - view even if the stance taken upsets a minority.)
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
sherbert
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 2,011
Gender: male
Re: National Trust (article in magazine)
Reply #14 - Oct 30th, 2007 at 9:24am
 
Barbara wrote on Oct 30th, 2007 at 9:18am:
So, in light of the above comments, do I abandon my complaint?  If not, where do I go from here, bearing in mind I have received no resopnse from OFCOM after approx 10 days?  (It was made quite clear to me that NT deals with a majority or "broader" as they describe it - view even if the stance taken upsets a minority.)


Barbara...The next phase is to go to...http://www.ofcom.org.uk/about/accoun/complaints/ This is how to complain about Ofcom! Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
(Moderators: bbb_uk, DaveM, CJT-80, Forum Admin, Dave)

Website and Content © 1999-2024 SAYNOTO0870.COM. All Rights Reserved.
Written permission is required to duplicate any of the content within this site.

WARNING: This is an open forum, posts are NOT endorsed by SAYNOTO0870.COM,
please exercise due caution when acting on any info from here.


SAYNOTO0870.COM » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved.


Valid RSS Valid XHTML Valid CSS Powered by Perl Source Forge