Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
SAYNOTO0870.COM

<---- Back to main website

 
Home Help Search Login Register

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
NTS Focus Group Minutes - August 9, 2007 (Read 12,694 times)
idb
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1,499
Miami, Florida, United States
Gender: male
NTS Focus Group Minutes - August 9, 2007
Oct 18th, 2007 at 2:43am
 
http://www.ofcom.org.uk/telecoms/groups/nts_focus/notes/nts20070809

NTS Focus Group - 9th August 2007 - 2.00 pm Ofcom

Agenda item (1) - Introductions

Attendance:

Andrew Wileman
Virgin Media (Chair)

Preya Chawhan
Band-X

Rob Day
BT

Kath Embleton
BT

Sean Hartley
BT

Justin Hornby
Cable & Wireless

Laurent Pariat
Cable & Wireless

Andrew Monk
Carphone Warehouse

Toby Higho
Easynet/Sky

Will Goodall
Flextel

Kevin Archer
Flextel

Andy Martin
IV Response

Lesa Green
Kingston

Geoff Brighton
Ofcom

Clive Hillier
Ofcom

Michael Barford
Tiscali

Agenda Item (2): Review of minutes of previous meeting

No comments/concerns were raised.

...
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 18th, 2007 at 3:02am by idb »  

As from November 21, 2013, I no longer participate in the forum and am unable to receive private messages.
 
IP Logged
 
idb
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1,499
Miami, Florida, United States
Gender: male
Re: NTS Focus Group Minutes - August 9, 2007
Reply #1 - Oct 18th, 2007 at 2:44am
 
...

Agenda (3): Update/progress report on the current 'live' NTS related consultations/investigations: (Ofcom/All)

Review of Regulation of Premium Rate Services

Clive Hillier advised that the research phase was progressing well. Preparation of the Consultation document is underway, with the intention of publishing in the Autumn.

NCCN 500 investigation/ NTS call termination market review

Clive Hillier said that a draft Determination had been issued to the parties to the dispute. Clive added that the deadline for comments had been extended at the request of one of the parties.

Andrew Wileman asked about the implications for the NTS call termination market review. Clive said that the commencement of the market review was contingent upon the publication of the final version of the Determination.

ICSTIS progress re. Governance of 0871

Geoff Brighton said that Ofcom and UKCTA had met on 8 th August to discuss industry concerns with the proposed changes to the regulations applying to 0871. Geoff added that Ofcom and ICSTIS had subsequently met on 9 th August. The ICSTIS Statement is due to be published in September and Ofcom will have sight of this in advance of publication.

Geoff said that ICSTIS had indicated its intention to apply a version of the 11 th PRS code to the 0871 range, but ICSTIS anticipated that its approach to enforcement will be ‘light touch’ at least during the initial period of applicability. Several attendees said that they believed the application of the full ICSTIS PRS code to be disproportionate and requested comfort/guarantees that the mooted light touch approach would prevail.

Andy Martin asked if ICSTIS would be publishing the responses that it had received to the condoc. Lesa Green said that she expected the sheer number of responses would make this unfeasible. There had been in excess of 700 replies, many of which used a standard consumer response template created by the ‘say no to 0870’ group. Will Goodall asked who regulates ICSTIS. Geoff Brighton said that the ICSTIS code has to be approved by Ofcom, but ultimately ICSTIS is a stand alone regulatory body in its own right. Will asked if Ofcom had the power of veto over ICSTIS. Geoff said that Ofcom’s approach to the ICSTIS statement would depend on its contents but that ultimately ICSTIS’s Code of Practice is subject to approval by Ofcom.

Will added that the due diligence requirements contained within ICSTIS’ proposals were too onerous –particularly if they were required to apply retrospectively. The FCS numbering group had raised serious concerns - in particular around the fact that those providers running 0871 services only were not geared up to comply with full PRS regulations. Will said that he believed the regulations would destroy the 0871 market.

Andrew Wileman asked if all avenues for lobbying ICSTIS had been explored. Most attendees confirmed that they had submitted individual responses to the ICSTIS consultation, together with additional representations via a number of industry groups.

It was suggested that ICSTIS be invited to attend the next NTS Focus Group .

New Action Aug07_01: ICSTIS to be invited to attend the next NTS Focus

Andrew Monk suggested that there was a risk that the forthcoming consumer protection test could lead to the introduction of due diligence requirements even if they were removed from the ICSTIS 0871 Code. Andrew suggested that a layered approach, variable by service or provider type could be more appropriate. Geoff Brighton said that Ofcom would raise the concerns of NTSFG members with ICSTIS.

Will Goodall expressed concern that the proposed 0871 regulation would eventually extend to 0844 services.

General Condition 14 Enforcement Programme

Clive Hillier said that Ofcom was in the process of reviewing the compliance of the Code of Practice with the General Conditions. This will be followed by a review of whether CPs are compliant with the Code of Practice. Thereafter, Ofcom will decide if any action needs to be taken.

Clive added that Ofcom was disappointed at the number of CPs that were still referring to 0845 & 0870 services as local and national rate.

Turning to action point Apr07_07, Will Goodall said that the information held on the BT Retail website had improved, but still required some additional amendments. Will agreed to email Kath Embleton with his remaining concerns.

New Action Aug07_02: Will Goodall to confirm remaining concerns with the pricing information held on the BT Retail website to Kath Embleton.

Andy Martin said that he believed equal prominence for all numbers was still not in place and that more stringent enforcement action needed to be taken – particularly where certain Mobile operators were concerned.

Will Goodall added that if Ofcom’s ongoing considerations around retail pricing resulted in BT retail pricing obligations being relaxed, clear pricing information must be a pre-requisite.

Own-Initiative Investigation into the Possible Mis-use of 087 Numbers

Clive Hillier advised that Ofcom had issued an update Competition Bulletin, concluding the investigation and as such the case had been closed. The specific company involved in the mis-use had ceased to operate in the UK.

...
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 18th, 2007 at 3:04am by idb »  

As from November 21, 2013, I no longer participate in the forum and am unable to receive private messages.
 
IP Logged
 
idb
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1,499
Miami, Florida, United States
Gender: male
Re: NTS Focus Group Minutes - August 9, 2007
Reply #2 - Oct 18th, 2007 at 2:44am
 
...

Agenda (4): Implementation of the 03 Range

Andrew Wileman asked if any pricing disputes had materialised. Clive Hillier confirmed that none had been submitted to Ofcom.

Laurant Pariat said that there had been little progress on the arrangements for porting 03 numbers to/from BT. Laurant sought clarity around what process should be followed and whom at BT CPs should engage with. Attendees requested the issue of 03 porting to be included as a specific agenda item at the next focus group meeting.

New Action Au07_03: Porting arrangements for 03 number ranges to be added to the agenda for the Sept 07 NTS FG meeting.

Lesa Green highlighted the fact that the BT DMA forms applying to the 03 number range provided for international access, whereas such access was still not available for 0844/0871 ranges. Will Goodall said that his interpretation of the regulations was that GC20 required NTS numbers to be accessible across the EU. Clive Hillier said that GC20 applies to all non-geographic numbers and requires TCPs to ensure that their numbers are available in EU countries to the extent technically and economically feasible, unless the user of the number requests otherwise. It does not apply to international carriers or overseas originators.

Will and Lesa confirmed that they had both submitted requests to BT to provision international access to 0844 and 0871 ranges. Lesa said that BT’s response had been that it did not believe that such access was appropriate at the present time, but BT was willing to engage in commercial dialogue. Both Lesa and Will felt, however, that progress had stalled and that there was a lack of visibility on how the issue was being taken forward by BT. BT agreed to provide some additional thinking on a way forward at the next NTS FG.

New Action Au07_04: BT to update on its position in respect of international access to 0844/71 ranges, including what needs to be done to open such access, at the next NTS FG meeting.

Kath Embleton said that there were a number of reasons why BT had not opened access to the ranges in question. Chief among these was the issue of overseas AIT .

Attendees agreed that this was a generic issue involving international access & gateway providers, not simply something that was centred on BT. As such, it was suggested that a sub group be convened to discuss international access to NTS ranges in general, with a view to addressing the current shortcomings.

New Action Au07_05: Sub group to be convened to discuss the general issue of international access to UK NTS ranges. Why oh why don't these cretins do something about it rather than create another talking shop? Answer - because they are all receiving fringe benefits from a corrupt system.
...
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 18th, 2007 at 3:04am by idb »  

As from November 21, 2013, I no longer participate in the forum and am unable to receive private messages.
 
IP Logged
 
idb
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1,499
Miami, Florida, United States
Gender: male
Re: NTS Focus Group Minutes - August 9, 2007
Reply #3 - Oct 18th, 2007 at 2:45am
 
...

Agenda Item (5) – Update on Implementation of 0870 Reforms

Attendees were informed that BT was referring the dispute to Ofcom in respect of the interconnect charges that would apply to 0870 calls post 1 st February 2008 in two batches. [Note: Ofcom did not receive two referrals but BT needed more time to confirm that further TCPs had rejected its offer. No referral has been made by a TCP]. Clive Hillier said that Ofcom’s enquiry phase was scheduled to conclude on 18 th August (subsequently extended to 31 August).

Will Goodall said that he believed that Flextel was still negotiating with BT. Will believed that Flextel’s specific cost base was a critical factor in these negotiations – as such he did not believe that it was appropriate for Flextel to be referred to Ofcom as part of a generic dispute. Will added that he was surprised that Ofcom could combine all such disputes when CPs had differing cost bases.

Andy Martin expressed concern at BT’s representation of the events leading to the dispute in the referral letter submitted to Ofcom. Andy said that he believed BT appeared to be apportioning blame for the inability to reach agreement on rates to the NTS FG – despite the concerted efforts that had been made/dedicated workshops that had been held.

Justin Hornby asked if there was any risk that Ofcom would reject the dispute referral on the grounds that all avenues of negotiation had not been pursued. Justin added that time pressures would become increasingly critical as the implementation date of the reforms approached.

Discussion turned to action point Jun07_04 (Ofcom to highlight the wording that requires BT Retail’s 0870 pricing to be uniform post 1st Feb 2008). Clive Hillier / Geoff Brighton clarified the points made at the previous focus group meeting about the regulations applying to 0870 post 1 st Feb 2008 , including the removal of the call origination condition, and the revised designation for 0870 calls in the Numbering Plan. OCPs would set the retail rate for 0870 calls – with an obligation to charge either geographic rates (or less) or provide a free to caller pre-announcement. However, OCPs would not be required to charge all 0870 calls at the same rate. Termination charges for 0870 calls are a matter for commercial negotiation in the first instance and there are no restrictions on TCPs proposing their own interconnect termination rates. Geoff added that if Ofcom accepts the 0870 termination charges dispute, these issues may feature in the dispute.

Will Goodall said that this underlined his belief that Flextel’s dispute with BT was separate and should not be included in a generic dispute referral. Will said that Ofcom had promised during the setting of the new 0870 policy that revenue certainty for TCPs would be preserved – and he believed that this would now not be the case. Will read out a statement highlighting Flextel’s concerns and confirming its position. This statement is appended below:

...
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 18th, 2007 at 3:05am by idb »  

As from November 21, 2013, I no longer participate in the forum and am unable to receive private messages.
 
IP Logged
 
idb
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1,499
Miami, Florida, United States
Gender: male
Re: NTS Focus Group Minutes - August 9, 2007
Reply #4 - Oct 18th, 2007 at 2:45am
 
...

“FleXtel statement at the NTS Focus Group of the 9 August 2007
(to be included in the meeting notes)

FleXtel generally supports Ofcom’s broad policy objective to protect consumers from

rapacious pricing. To ensure proper competition, price transparency is paramount

and so retail prices must be accurately labelled, this also protects consumers from

pricing scams. In normal markets, the retailer sets its retail tariff, taking into account

a negotiated wholesale tariff.

Ofcom’s intervention removes 0870 from the NTS Call Origination Condition, which

controls the wholesale price, based on BT’s retail price. It follows that TCPs should

now be able to set their own wholesale rates and have, as Ofcom promised,

“revenue certainty restored”. Therefore it is surely unreasonable for Ofcom to

impose a common termination rate based, once again, on BT’s retail price. The

question is therefore, should BT continue to control wholesale rates, if Ofcom have

promised “BT would purchase call termination from TCPs”?

It is now recognised that, if Ofcom finds in favour of BT’s offered rate, of about one

third of penny per minute, then TCPs will be forced to charge the called party up to

five pence per minute to receive 0870 calls. We can find no evidence that Ofcom

have taken this cost into account in its impact assessment. Furthermore, when

consulting on this intervention, Ofcom failed to highlight this extra cost burden to

stakeholders. Indeed, the consultation was silent on the issue in the “press release”,

the “high level summary” and in the “plain-English summary”. Only on page 67 of the

215-page detailed document was there a hint that such costs were “possible”.

As a result of the current state of affairs, a number of organisations have called on

Ofcom to delay implementation. These include the Cabinet Office, the FCS and the

CMA . Indeed, of all the NTS Focus Group members, it seems that only a minority

(including BT and Ofcom) wish to proceed .

When appraising the recent request from BT for a dispute, Ofcom may wish to

consider the Competition Act issues surrounding price fixing and cartels. The EU

Commission may be interested to discover why Ofcom is being asked by BT to force

wholesale prices below its suppliers costs, particularly as BT and Ofcom both

appear to favour proposals contrary to the opinion and expertise of many other

stakeholders.

Finally, if Ofcom continues with its proposals, without underpinning them with proper

impact assessment and consultation, with respect to the costs to receive 0870 calls,

then Ofcom’s actions could be construed as negligent. Some stakeholders may feel

justified in seeking compensation, if this were the case.”

End of Flextel statement.

...
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 18th, 2007 at 3:05am by idb »  

As from November 21, 2013, I no longer participate in the forum and am unable to receive private messages.
 
IP Logged
 
idb
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1,499
Miami, Florida, United States
Gender: male
Re: NTS Focus Group Minutes - August 9, 2007
Reply #5 - Oct 18th, 2007 at 2:46am
 
...

Agenda item (6) – Review of remaining outstanding actions

Action Aug06_09 : Porting differential issue to be added to the agenda of the first NTS FG meeting of 2007. Ongoing – Andrew Wileman said that the issue had not been added to the May agenda due to the breadth of topics already included and the potential linkage with the NCCN 500 investigation (which was still ongoing). The issue would remain on the outstanding actions list and would be included as an agenda item at a future date.

Action Feb07_05: Ofcom to review the concerns around 03 implementation and consider potential remedies to the situation. Discharged – Attendees agreed that any ongoing concerns would be dealt with on a business as usual basis, or via dispute, should one arise.

Action Apr07_06: Ofcom to monitor the situation re. 03 with the Cabinet Office Contact Council and report back to the NTS FG as appropriate. Discharged – Attendees were informed that the Cabinet Office Contact Council had made no further representations to Ofcom.

Action Apr07_07: BT to review the information on its website in light of the recent GC14 compliance investigation. Discharged – See new action point Aug07_02.

Action Apr07_08: Ofcom to confirm its thinking re. the GC20 obligations on access to UK 0844/71 codes from EU Member States. Discharged – See new action point Aug07_05.

Action May07_02: Attendees to forward ideas for increasing awareness/clarity of the 03 range to the chair for collation and distribution to Ofcom. Discharged – Andrew Wileman confirmed that no submissions had been received. It was therefore agreed that this action could be closed.

Action May07_03: Andrew Wileman to hold discussions with the chair of the Mobile Broadband Group with a view to gaining input to NTS debates from the mobile community (to include the prospect of MNO attendance at the NSTFG, or NTS FG member attendance at the Mobile Broadband Group). Ongoing.

Action Jun07_01: BT to write to CPs detailing the application of the Ofcom Determination and quoting the rates that would prevail. Discharged – BT had issued an industry briefing on 11 th July.

Action Jun07_02: Ofcom to issue a clarification note, confirming the status of the Determination and outlining its expectations for implementation of the resulting amended rates. Discharged – Ofcom had issued a clarification note to the NTS FG on 4 th July 2007 .

Action Jun07_03: BT to clarify the charging arrangements for the termination of 03 calls (and, post 1 st Feb 2008 , 0870 calls) on the BT network. Ongoing – Attendees requested that BT address the apparent ambiguity in the Carrier Price List that showed BT terminating calls as attracting a two-tier charge (ST and DLE).

Action Jun07_04: Ofcom to highlight the wording that requires BT Retail’s 0870 pricing to be uniform post 1st Feb 2008. Discharged – See notes under agenda item 5 above.

Action Jun07_05: Kath Embleton to confirm if the 1 st August BT Retail price changes will result in changes to the POLO rate. Discharged – Kath confirmed that the retail changes would not result in amendments to the POLO rate. This was because BT believed that any changes resulting from the increased retail fixed fee had been offset by reductions in the per minute charge. Laurant Pariat said that several CPs had requested additional justification of this offset. Laurant added that he believed that the NTS FG was the most appropriate forum in which to pursue this and asked that BT prepare a presentation on the reasoning behind the offset. Rob Day said that the Interconnect Briefing issued by BT outlines the rationale behind the offsetting, and asked what additional information C&W wanted to see. Laurant said that he wanted to gain reassurance in BT’s suggestions that the changes did directly offset each other. Rob said that to provide such comfort would entail the provision of commercially sensitive information – which BT would not be prepared to release. Ultimately, the only body that could provide absolute verification of the offset would be Ofcom.

Andrew Wileman suggested that there might be a compromise position. This could take the form of a ‘middle ground’ in which BT would provide a conceptual overview, without divulging commercially sensitive detail.

Laurant agreed to provide further detail to BT on the type of information that would afford C&W and other CPs the reassurance being sought. Rob said that BT would provide additional detail at the next NTS FG based on the compromise approach.

New Action Au07_06: Laurant Pariat to confirm to BT the type of information that would provide additional reassurance on the NTS POLO offsetting assertions.

New Action Au07_07: BT to provide additional detail on the NTS POLO offsetting at the next NTS FG.

...
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 18th, 2007 at 3:05am by idb »  

As from November 21, 2013, I no longer participate in the forum and am unable to receive private messages.
 
IP Logged
 
idb
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1,499
Miami, Florida, United States
Gender: male
Re: NTS Focus Group Minutes - August 9, 2007
Reply #6 - Oct 18th, 2007 at 2:46am
 
...

Agenda item (7) – Any Other Business

Chairmanship of NTS FG

Andrew Wileman confirmed that he had received one nomination/volunteer for the chairmanship of the NTS FG – that being Justin Hornby of Cable & Wireless. No objections to Justin’s appointment to the role were expressed, however it was agreed that non-attending stakeholders should be given the opportunity to express an opinion. An email would therefore be distributed to NTS FG members requesting that any objections to Justin’s appointment be made by midday on 24 th August. Assuming none were received, the new appointment would duly be made thereafter.

(Post meeting note: No objections were received. Justin Hornby has therefore been confirmed as the new chair.)

Date of Next Meeting:

The meeting next meeting will take place on Thursday 13 th September 2007 , commencing at 2:00pm , at Riverside House, London .

Summary of New and Outstanding Actions:

Aug06_09
Porting differential issue to be added to the agenda of the first NTS FG meeting of 2007

May07_03
Andrew Wileman to hold discussions with the chair of the Mobile Broadband Group with a view to gaining input to NTS debates from the mobile community (to include the prospect of MNO attendance at the NSTFG, or NTS FG member attendance at the Mobile Broadband Group.)

Jun07_03
BT to clarify the charging arrangements for the termination of 03 calls (and, post 1 st Feb 2008 , 0870 calls) on the BT network

Aug07_01
ICSTIS to be invited to attend the next NTS Focus Group

Aug07_02
Will Goodall to confirm remaining concerns with the pricing information held on the BT Retail website to Kath Embleton

Aug07_03
Porting arrangements for 03 number ranges to be added to the agenda for the Sept 07 NTS FG meeting

Aug07_04
BT to update on its position in respect of international access to 0844/71 ranges, including what needs to be done to open such access, at the next NTS FG meeting

Aug07_05
Sub group to be convened to discuss the general issue of international access to UK NTS ranges

Aug07_06
Laurant Pariat to confirm to BT the type of information that would provide additional reassurance on the NTS POLO offsetting assertions

Aug07_07
BT to provide additional detail on the NTS POLO offsetting at the next NTS FG

[end]
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 18th, 2007 at 3:06am by idb »  

As from November 21, 2013, I no longer participate in the forum and am unable to receive private messages.
 
IP Logged
 
Barbara
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 598
Re: NTS Focus Group Minutes - August 9, 2007
Reply #7 - Oct 18th, 2007 at 9:25am
 
Help!  I have read the above as far as I can understand it (now have a headache!) and I am full of admiration for those on this forum who keep the rest of us up to date with this and manage to interpret it all - thank you.   However, I am now more confused than ever.   I had thought that, from Feb 2008, 0870 was definitely going to cost no more than calls to geo nos and would probably/possibly be included in call packages, same with calls to 03 nos, indeed this was a large part of my email complaint to the National Trust.   However, reading the above, it seems nothing is certain at all, changes (whatever they are as that now seems unclear) may not happen by the due date or even at all.   Please can someone clarify this for me?   I think all of us on the forum need to be clear about the changes (or are they still proposals?) for when we are making representations to organisations over this.

Look forward to the reply.   Thanks.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Keith
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 378
Surrey
Gender: male
Re: NTS Focus Group Minutes - August 9, 2007
Reply #8 - Oct 18th, 2007 at 10:14am
 
Re 0870. My understanding is that they will either be equivalent to Geo No.s OR a pricing message has to be given at the start of the call. If the latter does that mean you will be charged for the call up to the point when you realise it is going to cost you or will you be given an opportunity to hang up without charge.

Anyone know?

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
jgxenite
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


Help us to help you -
read the instructions!!

Posts: 1,454
Gender: male
Re: NTS Focus Group Minutes - August 9, 2007
Reply #9 - Oct 18th, 2007 at 11:49am
 
I don't think even Ofcom is clear about that they are doing with 0870 at present(!!)
Back to top
 

I don't mind helping you with your request as long as you read the instructions!
 
IP Logged
 
pw4
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 130
Re: NTS Focus Group Minutes - August 9, 2007
Reply #10 - Oct 18th, 2007 at 12:00pm
 
The answer would seem to be in the fifth paragraph of agenda item 5:
Quote:
an obligation to charge either geographic rates (or less) or provide a free to caller pre-announcement.

Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 18th, 2007 at 12:00pm by pw4 »  
 
IP Logged
 
Barbara
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 598
Re: NTS Focus Group Minutes - August 9, 2007
Reply #11 - Oct 18th, 2007 at 1:06pm
 
Yes, that seems to be what Ofcom are saying BUT then there are references to some sort of dispute procedure and whether there should be one batch of complaints/appeals/disputes or multiples so is that reference a definitive answer or could there still be revisions up to and beyond Feb 2008, leaving consumers without any clear guidance and the whole thing being a lottery with no-one (almost certainly not Ofcom) having any idea who is or is not charging what for calls to various 0870 numbers?

While on this, I have never really understood the point about different pricings within the various 0870/0845 ranges to which there is sometimes reference on the forum depending on the 5th or subequent number(s) - can someone shed any light on this?  How are customers supposed to know the cost of a call unless they can find somewhere a comprehensive list (carried on their person at all times!) showing all the possible charges?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Keith
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 378
Surrey
Gender: male
Re: NTS Focus Group Minutes - August 9, 2007
Reply #12 - Oct 18th, 2007 at 3:54pm
 
pw4 - sorry my speed reading wasn't that good Undecided

That must be a nightmare to manage, particularly if there is a set up fee. If you don't hit the button quick enough you get charged and effectively there are two charges 0p for the first few min/secs then xp for the rest. But I guess they do this now with the inclusive packages, which charge after 1 hour. Never really understood why this kicks in after 1 hour and have been caught out a few times by it. Assume it is to stop some sort of abuse by being permanently on line.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Tanllan
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 797
Gender: male
Re: NTS Focus Group Minutes - August 9, 2007
Reply #13 - Oct 18th, 2007 at 5:00pm
 
Good (very) point Keith. Presumably the free front-end announcement must not trigger the BT call set-up charge?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
bbb_uk
Global Moderator
*****
Offline



Posts: 2,041
Re: NTS Focus Group Minutes - August 9, 2007
Reply #14 - Oct 18th, 2007 at 7:40pm
 
Barbara wrote on Oct 18th, 2007 at 1:06pm:
While on this, I have never really understood the point about different pricings within the various 0870/0845 ranges to which there is sometimes reference on the forum depending on the 5th or subequent number(s) - can someone shed any light on this?
0845 is a set rate and I believe 0870 has a few different price bands depending on number.  However there are different price ranges for 0844 and 0871.  In most cases, organisations use the highest costing number range to ensure they receive revenue as the lower the pence per minute for us consumers the lower the revenue (if any) that organisations receive.

Quote:
How are customers supposed to know the cost of a call unless they can find somewhere a comprehensive list (carried on their person at all times!) showing all the possible charges?
It's extremely difficult to get a full list of call costs from most, if not all, teleco's (including mobiles).  The reason is that most teleco's try and hide the cost of calls to these numbers because they're excluded from inclusive minutes and cost a lot more than geographical.  When Ofcom refer to GC14 (General Condition 14.2) then they are refering to a set of conditions to which teleco's have to comply with.  In particular, GC 14.2 is meant to ensure that call costs to 084x/087x numbers are of equal and prominent as teleco's prices to geographical numbers.  In other words, where a teleco has their price list for geographical calls on their website then on the same page and in similar size text, etc they are meant to give costs of the 0844, 0845, 0870 and 0871.  However, with regards to 0844, there are many, many, many different price ranges some with set prices per call so it is expected that teleco's would simply state that 0844 costs upto 5p/min (or whatever rate they charge upto for calls to 0844).

In most cases, teleco's don't fully comply with this general condition however some partly comply and some don't comply whatsoever.

As for 0870 numbers come February 2008, OFcom never said that 0870 would be charged at geographical rate just that all Ofcom have done is remove the "revenue sharing" from the 0870 number range.  Doing this, it is assumed, would mean that teleco's would then charge geographical rate for calls to 0870 numbers because with "revenue sharing" removed there is no need to charge higher rates for these calls.  If a teleco decided it would still charge extra for these calls then they had to provide a free-to-caller announcement.

A teleco providing a free-to-caller announcement of the costs to these numbers is something most telephone providers don't want to do because then it would highlight the actual cost of the call their customers (us) pay.  However, you never know what will happen and I suspect that some mobile networks may decide to charge extra for calls to 0870 but this is just speculation at this time.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 18th, 2007 at 7:53pm by bbb_uk »  
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
(Moderators: Dave, Forum Admin, CJT-80, DaveM, bbb_uk)

Website and Content © 1999-2024 SAYNOTO0870.COM. All Rights Reserved.
Written permission is required to duplicate any of the content within this site.

WARNING: This is an open forum, posts are NOT endorsed by SAYNOTO0870.COM,
please exercise due caution when acting on any info from here.


SAYNOTO0870.COM » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved.


Valid RSS Valid XHTML Valid CSS Powered by Perl Source Forge