moneysavin wrote on Jan 22
nd, 2008 at 1:03am:
Should they not indicate the cost
Do members think that the cost to call on a particular (unstated) BT tariff, with a qualification that other charges may be different, provides useful or adequate information?
I am inclined towards the idea that all revenue sharers (whether or not providers of “premium rate services”) should be required to state the fee that THEY charge and receive for the call. This must include the likely charge for the music download service provided in competition with i-tunes whilst one is waiting to speak to an agent. If a particular function is typically being performed, rather than just being a general enquiry service, then the likely charge for completing that function should be given.
The delivery charge is a separate element that should be quoted separately by the telephone service provider. If either of them wishes to also specify the total charge or rate then that could also be useful.
TV licensing could say for example (these figures are purely illustrative):
Quote:0844 800 5800 – service fee 1.5p per minute
1
- minimum total cost 5p per minute
1 2
.
A typical
TV Licensing telephone service fee of 6p
1
provides 2 minutes of music interspursed with useful recorded information plus allowing the time normally necessary to set up a Direct Debit or for over 75's to apply for their free licence.
Your telephone service provider will add a delivery charge of between 3.5p and 38.5p per minute
1 2
.
The total cost to set up a Direct Debit or apply for a free licence by telephone will typically be between 20p and £1.60
1 2
1 All prices given are subject to change and include VAT.
2 According to published information available at 1/11/07.
N.B. There is no service fee for using our internet service at ...
If, as is the case with all revenue sharing numbers, one is paying the person called for a service, then this is the type of information that must be provided.
David