Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
SAYNOTO0870.COM

<---- Back to main website

 
Home Help Search Login Register

Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print
0844 this can't be right? (Read 35,883 times)
NGMsGhost
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


The Forum Ghost of NonGeographicalMan<b
r />

Posts: 2,720
Surrey, United Kingdom
Gender: male
Re: 0844 this can't be right?
Reply #30 - Feb 26th, 2008 at 12:26pm
 
derrick wrote on Feb 26th, 2008 at 12:05pm:
It is 120 a month as I said in my post, you need to use a 5 day week, Mon-Fri, as you can get other calls free without monthly fees,( except the BT line rental).


It never seems like I make more than the minimum number required but when I examine my 1899 bills I find I am persistently paying more for 01/02 calls per month than I would with a fixed price package from www.yourcalls.net

It is all those cases where it is an answerphone or the wrong number etc that lead to this being so.

This is only since 1899 charged 5p per call.  When they charged 1p per call via 18866 it was of course hugely cheaper than an unlimited 01/02 calls package.
Back to top
 

<div style=
 
IP Logged
 
derrick
Supreme Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1,124
Re: 0844 this can't be right?
Reply #31 - Feb 26th, 2008 at 12:31pm
 
NGMsGhost wrote on Feb 26th, 2008 at 12:26pm:
derrick wrote on Feb 26th, 2008 at 12:05pm:
It is 120 a month as I said in my post, you need to use a 5 day week, Mon-Fri, as you can get other calls free without monthly fees,( except the BT line rental).


It never seems like I make more than the minimum number required but when I examine my 1899 bills I find I am persistently paying more for 01/02 calls per month than I would with a fixed price package from www.yourcalls.net

It is all those cases where it is an answerphone or the wrong number etc that lead to this being so.

This is only since 1899 charged 5p per call.  When they charged 1p per call via 18866 it was of course hugely cheaper than an unlimited 01/02 calls package.


As I said in my last post;- "You could use one of the free(VOIPSTUNT), online trial calls to check the number is live or answered by a person before using landline to make the actual call. ( that is if you are serious about reducing call costs  Wink )."

Otherwise if it is the case that you "persistently paying more for 01/02 calls per month than I would with a fixed price package from www.yourcalls.net", ; then go with that provider!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
SilentCallsVictim
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


aka NHS.Patient, DH_fairtelecoms

Posts: 2,494
Re: 0844 this can't be right?
Reply #32 - Feb 26th, 2008 at 12:35pm
 
I am reluctant to go off-topic by addressing the subject of this thread, but I would wish to repeat my point by asking what is the premium that these alternative providers charge for calling 0844 numbers?

It may be said that the premium charged by BT is reducing to 1p per minute, but that is to ignore the effect of those who are at home during the day switching onto option 3, or some other alternative. The per-minute element of the cost of calling geographic numbers is increasing by nearly 25%, whilst the cost of option 3 is reducing.

The break even point is around 1 5-minute call per weekday, after which one may make as many other geographic calls (of up to one hour) as one wishes for no further charge. This makes it very attractive for those at home during the day, who represent a significant proportion of any GP’s most frequent patients. (The same point applies to other public services using 084 and 087 numbers.)

Notwithstanding valid complaints about BT and Ofcom, the issue here is about the abuse of revenue sharing by GPs. The Department of Health review which is underway may provide the chance for something to be achieved, if efforts can be focussed on this point.
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
NGMsGhost
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


The Forum Ghost of NonGeographicalMan<b
r />

Posts: 2,720
Surrey, United Kingdom
Gender: male
Re: 0844 this can't be right?
Reply #33 - Feb 26th, 2008 at 12:46pm
 
SilentCallsVictim wrote on Feb 26th, 2008 at 12:35pm:
what is the premium that these alternative providers charge for calling 0844 numbers?[/b].


Premium compared to what SCV?  Compared to the BT price for 0844 or compared to the cost of an 01/02 call?

We know doctor's 0844 numbers generally cost 5p per minute.  Presumably BT are raising the price of 01/02 calls to try and further blur the argument.  Especially by also getting rid of the cheap off peak deal in the weekday daytime.

But the fact of the matter is that 01/02 at any time inclusive calls packages now cost as little as £3.50 per month with www.yourcalls.net so it is against a zero cost for an 01/02 number that we are now making the comparison.
Back to top
 

<div style=
 
IP Logged
 
SilentCallsVictim
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


aka NHS.Patient, DH_fairtelecoms

Posts: 2,494
Re: 0844 this can't be right?
Reply #34 - Feb 26th, 2008 at 12:54pm
 
NGMsGhost wrote on Feb 26th, 2008 at 12:46pm:
Premium compared to what SCV?


Sorry - by "premium", I meant over and above the cost of 01/02 calls. That is the point at issue in this thread.
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
NGMsGhost
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


The Forum Ghost of NonGeographicalMan<b
r />

Posts: 2,720
Surrey, United Kingdom
Gender: male
Re: 0844 this can't be right?
Reply #35 - Feb 26th, 2008 at 1:28pm
 
SilentCallsVictim wrote on Feb 26th, 2008 at 12:54pm:
NGMsGhost wrote on Feb 26th, 2008 at 12:46pm:
Premium compared to what SCV?


Sorry - by "premium", I meant over and above the cost of 01/02 calls. That is the point at issue in this thread.

Well clearly its 5p per minute versus zero p per minute for those on call plans that cover all 01/02 numbers such as BT Option 3.  I thought that was well established ground.

No landline phone provider tariff charges more than 5p per minute for calls to an 0844 number as far I am aware.  I think there is a maximum Ofcom charge limit for landlines of 5p per minute to 084 numbers and 10p per minute to 087 numbers.  Heaven knows which Ofcom General Condition it can be found in though.

Of course a new potential ripoff area is rounding up per minute and also the connection charge (which there seems to be no limit on the level of so no doubt 20p connection fees are on their way).

Magenta Systems has a lot of information on different telco tariffs if you are prepared to spend hours trawling through it all.

See www.magsys.co.uk/telecom/
Back to top
 

<div style=
 
IP Logged
 
SilentCallsVictim
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


aka NHS.Patient, DH_fairtelecoms

Posts: 2,494
Re: 0844 this can't be right?
Reply #36 - Feb 26th, 2008 at 4:13pm
 
NGMsGhost wrote on Feb 26th, 2008 at 1:28pm:
Magenta Systems has a lot of information on different telco tariffs if you are prepared to spend hours trawling through it all.

I raised the question as the tariffs of various other providers were introduced to a thread about the premium for calling GPs on 0844. I have made the point about the relevant upcoming position with respect to BT, I was hoping that those who introduced discussion of other providers would be able to do the same.

Whilst the upcoming BT changes will, I believe, encourage many to adopt option 3, they may encourage others to take up alternatives. I had hoped that those who are experienced users of these providers, with a concern about use of g6 0844 numbers, might themselves know the relevant prices.

I have attempted to use the Magenta tables in the past, but they are not sufficiently detailed and have been seen to be inaccurate.
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
NGMsGhost
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


The Forum Ghost of NonGeographicalMan<b
r />

Posts: 2,720
Surrey, United Kingdom
Gender: male
Re: 0844 this can't be right?
Reply #37 - Feb 26th, 2008 at 4:48pm
 
SilentCallsVictim wrote on Feb 26th, 2008 at 4:13pm:
I had hoped that those who are experienced users of these providers, with a concern about use of g6 0844 numbers, might themselves know the relevant prices.


But surely you know that people like I and Derrick never call these numbers.  Neither my own doctor's surgery or that of my mother uses an 0844 number.

I am now a customer now of www.yourcalls.net but they do not publish their rate for calling 0844 numbers - not even to me as a customer. Shocked Angry

You are over complicating things SCV.  The basic point is that 0844 numbers to doctors are charged by pretty much all telecoms providers at 5p per minute plus a connection fee (usually 3p now in most cases) whereas on inclusive call packages there is no extra marginal cost for making the call (cost is zero)

Avoid the cunning ruse set by BT in increasing their 01/02 call prices to nearly 4p per minute while cutting 0845 to 2p per minute as this is clearly a deliberate rear guard action to protect the retention of 0845 numbers by governmental and other organisations.

~ Edited by Dave: Quote box tidied up
Back to top
« Last Edit: Feb 26th, 2008 at 4:54pm by Dave »  

<div style=
 
IP Logged
 
moneysavin
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 131
Re: 0844 this can't be right?
Reply #38 - Feb 26th, 2008 at 5:42pm
 
NGMsGhost wrote on Feb 26th, 2008 at 4:48pm:
 The basic point is that 0844 numbers to doctors are charged by pretty much all telecoms providers at 5p per minute plus a connection fee (usually 3p now in most cases)


The large majority would be charged more then 3p connection from a landline as BT and Talk Talk charge 6p connection,and Virgin Media now charge 7p i believe. Wink
Back to top
« Last Edit: Feb 26th, 2008 at 5:55pm by moneysavin »  
 
IP Logged
 
SilentCallsVictim
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


aka NHS.Patient, DH_fairtelecoms

Posts: 2,494
Re: 0844 this can't be right?
Reply #39 - Feb 26th, 2008 at 5:50pm
 
NGMsGhost wrote on Feb 26th, 2008 at 4:48pm:
The basic point is that 0844 numbers to doctors are charged by pretty much all telecoms providers at 5p per minute plus a connection fee (usually 3p now in most cases)

3+5 is less than 6+4. Another piece of NEG propaganda here, supported by the DH; suggesting that different operators have different unspecified rates leaves it in the balance as to whether calls to g6 0844 numbers cost more. I have been trying desparately to contend that there is no need to conduct extensive searches and surveys, because the need to support the revenue share means that g6 0844 numbers will always cost more.

I do not wish to avoid the upcoming BT price changes because I believe that they will cause the excess paid to call 0844, and perhaps also 0845, users in the public service to increase overall, as more callers move to inclusive packages, either from BT or other providers.

Those who have no interest in the cost of calling 0844 numbers are perhaps posting to the wrong thread.
I was hoping that the subject of this thread would provide an opportunity to co-ordinate more effective lobbying of those in a position to prevent misuse of these numbers, rather than a debate about the relative merits of telephone service providers and the personal preferences of forum members.
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
NGMsGhost
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


The Forum Ghost of NonGeographicalMan<b
r />

Posts: 2,720
Surrey, United Kingdom
Gender: male
Re: 0844 this can't be right?
Reply #40 - Feb 26th, 2008 at 6:27pm
 
SilentCallsVictim wrote on Feb 26th, 2008 at 5:50pm:
Those who have no interest in the cost of calling 0844 numbers are perhaps posting to the wrong thread.

I was hoping that the subject of this thread would provide an opportunity to co-ordinate more effective lobbying of those in a position to prevent misuse of these numbers, rather than a debate about the relative merits of telephone service providers and the personal preferences of forum members.


SCV,

My dear friend this all sounds frighteningly intense and stressful after your recent health scare that I understand forced you to use NHS Direct for real.  Shouldn't you be laying off this kind of subject matter for a while because morally righteous though it undoubtedly is unfortunately it is not at all good for the soul because of the unscrupulous - we are up against who will stop at absolutely nothing to hang on to their 084/7 gains.  Also hasn't Ofcom's alleged short term postponement of 0870 price changes (suprise, surprise not now becoming long term) already told you that we are pushing water massively up hill here.  MPs ask questions about these numbers month in and month out but still Geoff Brighton and his cynical henchmen at Ofcom characterise this as the concern only of a small bunch of extremists.

Important New Labour friends in high places make vast amounts of money from this swindle and they will stop at absolutely nothing to leave it in place.  The only thing that will and can stop it is action from Madame Viviane Reding at the EU and I think it is in that direction we should really be turning our attentions.

The latest 084/7 price revisions are of course made precisely to divide and confuse, especially for instance making all 01/02 calls on BT Option 1 charged at a per minute rates in the weekday evening, thus weekening the case that 0844 is much more expensive at this time.

The angle we need to concentrate on is the exclusion of 084/7 from fixed price call packages that we will argue all the unemployed and retired on low incomes are generally inclined to take up because they are at home so much and thus make a lot of landline calls.
Back to top
 

<div style=
 
IP Logged
 
Dave
Global Moderator
*****
Offline



Posts: 9,902
Yorkshire
Gender: male
Re: 0844 this can't be right?
Reply #41 - Feb 26th, 2008 at 7:01pm
 
I must agree with NGMsGhost on this one. SCV, it seems like you're trying to justify 084x NGNs because they work out cheaper than geographicals on certain tariffs at certain times.

BTW, the call set up charge for 084x numbers on BT Together is 6p, the same as for geographical numbers. The 3p call set up charge applies for "non-discounted" customers such as those on LUS.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
NGMsGhost
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


The Forum Ghost of NonGeographicalMan<b
r />

Posts: 2,720
Surrey, United Kingdom
Gender: male
Re: 0844 this can't be right?
Reply #42 - Feb 26th, 2008 at 7:11pm
 
Dave wrote on Feb 26th, 2008 at 7:01pm:
BTW, the call set up charge for 084x numbers on BT Together is 6p, the same as for geographical numbers. The 3p call set up charge applies for "non-discounted" customers such as those on LUS.

We pay more than double the line rental so as to pay double the connection charge.  Truly scandalous.

I think I must try to find out what connections fees www.yourcalls.net charge for 084/7 as nowhere on their website is this made clear.
Back to top
 

<div style=
 
IP Logged
 
SilentCallsVictim
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


aka NHS.Patient, DH_fairtelecoms

Posts: 2,494
Re: 0844 this can't be right?
Reply #43 - Feb 26th, 2008 at 11:11pm
 
Dave wrote on Feb 26th, 2008 at 7:01pm:
I must agree with NGMsGhost on this one. SCV, it seems like you're trying to justify 084x NGNs because they work out cheaper than geographicals on certain tariffs at certain times.
I am most disappointed to encounter opposition, and unnecessarily personal comments, once again.

I have sought to show that calls to 0844 g6 numbers are invariably more expensive, to counter the arguments of NEG, but find the NEG position being supported. I have sought to lobby for defence of the unique principles of the NHS, which are being undermined by use of 0844 numbers, but a moderator concurs with the view that such comments are inappropriate in this forum.

If those who post here are required to accept that only action by the European Commission is likely to  affect the way in which we run our National Health Service and that the views of an officer of Ofcom will determine how the Department of Health behaves, then I am unable to contribute further, as I cannot subscribe to such nonsense.

This thread began with a new member asking for advice on how to complain about his doctor using a 0844 number.  It has been picked up by others, including myself, to be used to discuss matters that many would see as being quite unrelated.
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
NGMsGhost
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


The Forum Ghost of NonGeographicalMan<b
r />

Posts: 2,720
Surrey, United Kingdom
Gender: male
Re: 0844 this can't be right?
Reply #44 - Feb 27th, 2008 at 2:00am
 
SilentCallsVictim wrote on Feb 26th, 2008 at 11:11pm:
If those who post here are required to accept that only action by the European Commission is likely to  affect the way in which we run our National Health Service and that the views of an officer of Ofcom will determine how the Department of Health behaves, then I am unable to contribute further, as I cannot subscribe to such nonsense.

This thread began with a new member asking for advice on how to complain about his doctor using a 0844 number.  It has been picked up by others, including myself, to be used to discuss matters that many would see as being quite unrelated.


My Dear SCV,

I am sorry if showing proper concern for your state of health is taken as an unnecessary personal intrusion.  I only made the point because the normal course of action after any such health problem is to reduce one's level of stress and what could be more stressful than trying to worry if NEG could weadle their way around the self evident fact that 0844 is not a normal priced phone tariff.

With great respect you continue to play their game by worrying yourself excessively whether by cunning games with lower connection fees on the BT Light User Scheme (which almost no one makes any calls on) there may not be some rare instance in which 0844 is cheaper to call than an 01 or 02 number.

One needs to focus on the core issues applicable to 99% of those calling the numbers and which explains why 0844 numbers incur such wrath:-

(a) 0844 is excluded from 01/02/03 bundled call packages

(b) 0844 is violently more expensive to call from a BT Payphone and many mobile phone deals.  It is never cheaper to call on a mobile than 01/02

(c) There is a revenue share passed to the doctor's surgery to pay for their phone system at the point of use.

NEG are a bunch of twisting charlatans and they have mates in the telecoms industry who are assisting their current efforts to twist things.

You need to focus on the key issues which are overwhelmingly against these numbers rather than becoming obsessively worried about NEG's devious attempts to shoot us down.

What we need to do is to get the 90% of the doctors who have not gone to 0844 to speak out more against their unprincipled money grabbing colleagues who have and how they feel their actions are totally reprehensible.

Searching endless telecoms tariffs is not the way to go to try to win the argument.

SCV you are a must jovial chap when met in person so I am always perplexed by your forum persona which has always made me think you were some kind of supremely pedantic boffin.  How is this reconciled with the chap we met at the Information Tribunal who was guffawing his way with mirth through much of the hearing.  I didn't take you then to be a chap to lie awake at night worrying if there was just one tariff at one time of day for some narrow user group where due to recent BT slights of hand 0844 was cheaper than an 01/02 number.

Focus instead on things like TalkTalk's Broadband product which bundles free 01/02 calls too but excludes 0844 numbers.  Ditto BT's now very reasonable Option 3.

Looking at the evidence is old Ofcom speak for excuses to take no action.  It is not a real hunt for the truth.  I would have thought by now that you would surely have realised that.
Back to top
 

<div style=
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print
(Moderators: CJT-80, Dave, DaveM, bbb_uk, Forum Admin)

Website and Content © 1999-2024 SAYNOTO0870.COM. All Rights Reserved.
Written permission is required to duplicate any of the content within this site.

WARNING: This is an open forum, posts are NOT endorsed by SAYNOTO0870.COM,
please exercise due caution when acting on any info from here.


SAYNOTO0870.COM » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved.


Valid RSS Valid XHTML Valid CSS Powered by Perl Source Forge