The new version has a few amendments and some points remain which should surely have been updated. Paragraph numbering has changed so that each one has its own number. In some cases, odd words have changed here and there. The previous release of this document was an update in August 2006 which can be downloaded
here.
Paragraph 3.54 was 3.52. The following text has been removed:
Quote:…Some mobile operators currently do charge for free numbers, however COI has arranged an agreement alongside the Telephones Helplines Association (THA) to exclude calls to certain types of 0800/0808 lines from being charged for.
The new version now makes no mention that freephone numbers are chargeable from mobiles or these "special" numbers which can be used so they are free.
Paragraph 3.59 (was paragraph 3.53, 5) was:
Quote:COI will be working with Ofcom during the implementation of this new tariff structure and have already advised on who might wish to make use of such a tariff. We will be seeking to make this an important part of our own aggregated inbound tariff arrangements so as to benefit Government collectively.
The sentence in italics has been replaced by:
Quote:…However, there is a cost involved and you may wish to look into the benefits of aggregating your spend into a larger contract with a provider. COI runs such an activity on behalf of government and will be making this an important part of its own aggregated inbound tariff arrangements so as to benefit government collectively.
For some reason, paragraph 3.61 (formally 3.55 (1)) is as it was previously:
Quote:From January 2008, 0871 will be ICSTIS-regulated and positioned as a premium rate (up to 10p per minute from BT lines) with a revenue share facility, and so is not recommended for government activity. Calls can be expensive for the public and the revenue share can be viewed negatively by citizens, who may feel that the department concerned is exploiting them. Even if the revenue is being utilised towards the service’s cost of operation, this might not be fully understood or accepted.
Paragraph 3.63 (was 3.55 (3)) has been amended to say that COI understands that the change has been put back to September 2008.
Paragraph 3.65 (formally 3.57) has been amended with the text in italics:
Quote:If you are asking citizens to respond by coupon or reply card, COI recommends offering a freepost address to avoid the cost and inconvenience of postage stamps. If you are using SMS, you should consider the cost to the citizen of sending a text, particularly since a response may involve multiple texts back and forth. It is worth investigating this option as some mobile companies offer free texts within packages, while some available short codes can be made free to respondents.
Paragraph 3.66 (formally 3.58) is still as was in August 2006:
Quote:You should always clearly communicate the cost of calls/texts to customers on publicity materials and you should not use any misleading terms such as ‘local rate’, ‘national rate’ etc. COI can advise on this and Ofcom intends to develop descriptions for the tariffs to try to increase tariff transparency.
I'm not sure when Ofcom intends to "develop" descriptions and why it should take so long.
Paragraph 3.67 (formally 3.59) is also still as was in the previous version:
Quote:The choice of tariff is often a decision that should be made as part of wider communications/publicity planning. The tariff should be given due consideration and its impact on the citizen discussed. COI can advise on this and can source non-geographic telephone numbers as part of its centralised inbound aggregated tariff arrangements at highly discounted rates.
It would be interesting to know how many public sector services know this and how many have taken COI up on its offer.