Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
SAYNOTO0870.COM

<---- Back to main website

 
Home Help Search Login Register

Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Ofcom's duty to "Citizens" - Consultation (Read 11,595 times)
SilentCallsVictim
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


aka NHS.Patient, DH_fairtelecoms

Posts: 2,494
Ofcom's duty to "Citizens" - Consultation
Jul 11th, 2008 at 2:30pm
 
Ofcom has announced a consultation on Citizens, Communications and Convergence.

This is based on a "discussion paper" that is hoped to "stimulate debate" about Ofcom's distinct duties to consumers and citizens.

My own views on this matter have been widely expressed and published.

I would briefly summarise these as being that any matter within the scope of Ofcom's responsibilities that cannot be resolved through the interplay between providers of telecommunications services and consumers of those services must fall under Ofcom's duties to citizens.

Ofcom's failure to classify those who provide services using "revenue sharing" telephone numbers as being providers of "premium rate services" means that they are not thereby classified as providers of telecommunications services. Ofcom therefore has no duty to those who purchase their services as consumers.

In the same way, those who receive Silent Calls are not consumers of those who call them (so far as Ofcom is concerned) unless the Silent Call is made by the victim's own telephone service provider.

Those who are interested to engage in discussion about Ofcom's role and responsibilities may be interested to participate, subject to well known concerns about the effect of Ofcom consultations. This is however only said to be a matter for discussion.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 4th, 2008 at 7:53pm by Dave »  
WWW  
IP Logged
 
NGMsGhost
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


The Forum Ghost of NonGeographicalMan<b
r />

Posts: 2,720
Surrey, United Kingdom
Gender: male
Re: Ofcom's duty to "Citizens"
Reply #1 - Jul 12th, 2008 at 9:55pm
 
This would appear to amount to an admission that they don't actually understand what Ofcom's principal duty is!

It seems something must lie behind them bothering to launch such a consulration though.    Do you think they have finally started to get worried about the kind of negative comments that they are receiving in consultation responses? Undecided
Back to top
 

<div style=
 
IP Logged
 
Dave
Global Moderator
*****
Offline



Posts: 9,902
Yorkshire
Gender: male
Re: Ofcom's duty to "Citizens"
Reply #2 - Jul 12th, 2008 at 10:08pm
 
Quote:
1.1 The purpose of this paper is to discuss and clarify Ofcom’s role in furthering the interests of citizens. It sets out our thinking on this issue and we hope that it stimulates debate.

Is this not defined in the Communications Act?
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jul 12th, 2008 at 10:08pm by Dave »  
 
IP Logged
 
NGMsGhost
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


The Forum Ghost of NonGeographicalMan<b
r />

Posts: 2,720
Surrey, United Kingdom
Gender: male
Re: Ofcom's duty to "Citizens"
Reply #3 - Jul 12th, 2008 at 10:36pm
 
Dave wrote on Jul 12th, 2008 at 10:08pm:
Is this not defined in the Communications Act?


Perhaps Ofcom have long since lost their copy. Angry Angry Angry Cry
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jul 12th, 2008 at 10:36pm by NGMsGhost »  

<div style=
 
IP Logged
 
SilentCallsVictim
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


aka NHS.Patient, DH_fairtelecoms

Posts: 2,494
Re: Ofcom's duty to "Citizens"
Reply #4 - Jul 14th, 2008 at 4:00am
 
Dave wrote on Jul 12th, 2008 at 10:08pm:
Is this not defined in the Communications Act?

No. Not in detail, although the implications of what is meant may be derived from the declaration of specific duties and powers. That is not however definition.

The only relevant point is the clear distinction between the duties to a) citizens and b) consumers. These are said to potentially conflict and so must be distinct.

I have even researched the parliamentary debates on the Communications Bill, including the lengthy proceedings of the joint select committee that preceded its presentation. There is not much light to be found there either.

Ofcom clearly wishes to engage in "discussion" of this issue. This could be with good or with bad motives.
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
NGMsGhost
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


The Forum Ghost of NonGeographicalMan<b
r />

Posts: 2,720
Surrey, United Kingdom
Gender: male
Re: Ofcom's duty to "Citizens"
Reply #5 - Jul 14th, 2008 at 11:26am
 
SilentCallsVictim wrote on Jul 14th, 2008 at 4:00am:
Ofcom clearly wishes to engage in "discussion" of this issue. This could be with good or with bad motives.


I am sure they are looking to shore up their ludicrous position that the best interests of the UK citizen consumer are served by allowing businesses to scam the public using whatever dubious commercial practices they feel like using while Ofcom continues to act as a covert trade association for the UK telecommunications industry. Angry
Back to top
 

<div style=
 
IP Logged
 
SilentCallsVictim
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


aka NHS.Patient, DH_fairtelecoms

Posts: 2,494
Re: Ofcom's duty to "Citizens"
Reply #6 - Oct 4th, 2008 at 4:25am
 
The closing date for this consultation is NEXT WEDNESDAY 8 October.

I am working on my response over the weekend.

There are no specific questions, so I am sure that any general comment would be accepted (subject to normal rules of courtesy). Ofcom's open invitation is as follows (my emphasis):

Quote:
We look forward to receiving your views on this paper,
and on the issues that should be addressed as part of our agenda to promote the interests of citizens.
Please send your comments to alistair.bridge@ofcom.org.uk by 8 October 2008.
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
SilentCallsVictim
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


aka NHS.Patient, DH_fairtelecoms

Posts: 2,494
Re: Ofcom's duty to "Citizens" - Consultation
Reply #7 - Oct 8th, 2008 at 2:46pm
 
The closing date is today was the day this message was posted.

I must stress that this is a less formal consultation than usual. Noting the terms of the invitation to respond, as quoted above, I am sure that any unstructured rant by email would qualify as a valid response.

Ofcom's consultation guidelines state that responses to consultations will be published, assuming consent from the respondent. There is no indication that this consultation will be deviating from these guidelines, although the usual provision for publication has not been made on the web page.

Members and guests may be interested to read a rather lengthy response which is available here.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 9th, 2008 at 5:31am by SilentCallsVictim »  
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
(Moderators: Forum Admin, bbb_uk, Dave, CJT-80, DaveM)

Website and Content © 1999-2024 SAYNOTO0870.COM. All Rights Reserved.
Written permission is required to duplicate any of the content within this site.

WARNING: This is an open forum, posts are NOT endorsed by SAYNOTO0870.COM,
please exercise due caution when acting on any info from here.


SAYNOTO0870.COM » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved.


Valid RSS Valid XHTML Valid CSS Powered by Perl Source Forge