eric_donovan wrote on Nov 13
th, 2008 at 11:20pm:
You don't understand. It's not your fault, you're not a developer. The size of an image of an application has absolutely nothing to do with what size it actually is or how it functions. It's really like saying "that picture of that cake's big, it must have loads of calories in it".
Oh, what a wonderful cheap thrill you must have got from writing that superbly smug slap-down.
The picture of the supposed application in action has place names such as Cupertino in it. Yes, some of us are aware of a certain well-known company coming from that area.
In other words, it is not a sample from a working program by the person posting it, or if it is, it certainly has nothing to do with the declared purpose of looking up alternates for UK phone numbers.
And I'm quite aware of ways to reduce data use, thank you. I and others suggested one. You may think WAP prehistoric, but it works.
You've missed the point about image size; over 500k of images were put on a forum thread a fraction of that size, which might be inconsiderate while some people still read it via slower connections. Other image formats use less data; one inefficient choice may indicate an inclination not to optimise other details.
Perhaps one of the software fiends with rather better developed interpersonal skills might explain a couple of things to us mere mortals.
I assume that the phrase page-scraping refers to downloading a web page, then software parsing through all the code to find the wanted details, the second part a process that the human eye and brain are actually much better adapted to. Intuitively, it seems it must still involve the cost of data of the whole page, unless some intermediate proxy server is used for data compression, so I don't see it having significant advantages over just using a web browser; the user still has to enter a number somewhere ...
On the other hand, if a query can be sent to the database and get only just the data required, much of the work is done on the server feeding the website. But the potential problems include that this could expose it to badly written queries that could introduce bugs and even crash the whole system, taking the website off the air.
So obviously careful vetting of applicants would be essential. What references can we see so far, that would create confidence in the quality of the software, and likelihood to respect licence conditions? A half-plagiarised cut-and paste image of what might be a directory enquiries application for halfway round the world, someone who's been rejected by Apple for failing to support terms and conditions of contracts they have with other parties, a series of veiled threats to connive at nicking the data anyway, either here or from other sources, loads of patronising insults, etc. No wonder DaveM could not keep the word chancer from springing to mind.