I think another point is important. Their assesment that all calls should be free, but some services should be "free to caller" and some "freephone" - i.e. 40p/min or more from mobiles:
Quote:In order to distinguish between different charging arrangements in this document, the
term ‘freephone’ is used to describe the situation where calls can be charged for
provided there is a non-chargeable announcement at the start of the call to inform the
caller, i.e. calls which are commonly charged from mobiles. The term ‘free to caller’ is
used to describe the situation where calls are always free, including from mobiles.
Quote:Within the constraints of the Decision, the options for charging arrangements are:
Charging option 1: all 116 numbers are ‘freephone’
Charging option 2: all 116 numbers are ‘free to caller’
Charging option 3: 116 numbers are either ‘freephone’ or ‘free to
caller’ on an individual basis
Ofcom prefer option 3.
I strongly disagree with this. Why muddy the waters before they are even here. All 116 calls should be "free to caller" whatever, otherwise nobody will know if a call is truely free or not, and this will put people off calling. After all, who knows how much a random 118 or 0844 number is going to cost in advance, without having to look it up. Why stress out an abused kid looking for help even further by ensuring they don't know if they've enough credit to call?
If anybody agrees with me, read the whole pdf off the page linked to by SCV, wordy though it is, and fill in the response form here:
http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/116/howtorespond/form
Pages: 1
116 "Free to caller" numbers (Read 4,040 times)
