http://www.ofcom.org.uk/telecoms/groups/nts_focus/notes/nts_291009NTS Focus Group – 29th October 2009 – 2.00 pm OfcomAgenda item (1) - Introductions
Attendance:
Colin Scott C&W (Temp Chair)
Geoff Brighton Ofcom
Sean Hartley BT
Catherine Gerosa Invomo
Richard Anderson COLT
Jason Hopkinson BT
Clive Hillier Ofcom
Thomas Gransalke Orange
Sarah Godfrey 4D Interactive
Andy Martin IV Response
Stephen Ornadel T-Mobile
Laurent Pariat C&W
Tanya Rofani Ofcom
By telephone:
Will Goodall Flextel
Lesa Green Kcom
Warren Berdo SkyCom
Louise Lancaster Gamma
Apologies:
Justin Hornby C&W - Chair
Agenda (1): Review of Actions.
Colin Scott opened the meeting and confirming that no actions were outstanding following the last meeting. The minutes from the last meeting would be sent out shortly.
Agenda (2): Update / progress report on the current 'live' NTS related consultations / investigations: (Ofcom/All)
* PRS Scope Review
Geoff Brighton (Ofcom) highlighted that the PRS Scope review had been published the previous day (28th October) and asked if the Focus Group would be interested in having members of the Ofcom PRS team attend the next Focus Group. Those present welcomed this suggestion.
Action- Oct_09/01: Geoff Brighton to arrange for representatives of the Ofcom PRS Team to attend the next NTS FG.
Warren Berdo (Skycom) highlighted that the document appeared to over state the number of OCPs. There also seemed to be confusion over the use of upstream and downstream. Geoff Brighton agreed to feedback those issues to the Ofcom team.
Andy Martin (IVResponse) highlighted the cost estimate of 600k for the number checker. He stated that he believed this was excessive. Sarah Godfrey (4D Interactive) highlighted that lower costs quotations had been declined.
Geoff Brighton said that Communication Providers wishing to feedback anything to Ofcom on the PhonePayplus 12th Code of Practice should contact Jeff Loan at Ofcom.
* PRS Bad Debt Surcharge:
Geoff Brighton confirmed the independent consultants looking into the PRS Bad Debt Surcharge would start next week. A further consultation or statement was expected before Christmas. A consultation would be issued if the independent review concluded with a different outcome from the initial consultation.
Geoff confirmed that Ofcom were about to issue formal information requests to a number of large Communication Providers who originate calls to PRS numbers in order to establish a suitable benchmark to contrast the BT information.
Agenda Item (3) & (4): NCCN908, 958, 985 and 986 0800, 0845 and 0870 transit charging (All)
Agenda items 3 & 4 were taken together.
Andy Martin confirmed that IVR Response were continuing discussions with BT over their OCCN to enable them to charge more for access to IVResponse ranges via BT if an originating CP charges more than the BT Retail rate. Andy stressed that both IVResponse and BT needed to undertake development work.
Colin Scott (C&W) asked BT how they would notify other CP of the different prices. Sean Hartley (BT) said that the priority was to get the billing solution sorted and then a solution would be sought to publish the pricing within the CPL.
Stephen Ornadel (T-Mobile) asked how originating CPs would know what they were being charged. Sean Hartley said it was likely that IVResponse would use the same pricing ladder as BT, so to do anything different would be too complex to implement.
Will Goodall (Flextel) raised competition concerns, stating that BT Retail was the only CP able to do this and this was to the detriment of other terminating providers. Will urged Ofcom to open an own initiative investigation into this issue as the current T-Mobile NCCN956 dispute wasnt wide enough to consider all the relevant points.
Sean Hartley (BT) said that it was a BT Wholesales NCCN and therefore nothing to do with BT Retail. Will Goodall said he believed that BT Retail customer would get likely get the benefit if they used BT number ranges.
Geoff Brighton said Ofcom had no plans to open a further investigation and that the T-Mobile dispute was in progress and would reach its conclusion in due course. Should Flextel or any other party wish Ofcom to investigate they would need to refer a dispute or complaint to Ofcom.
Agenda Item (5): 03 termination rates and charges
Sean Hartley set out BTs position on 03 charging, following the issuance of OCCNs aligning the 03 charge with that of 0870. Sean asked if there was going to be consensus on this issue and was seeking to avoid a dispute.
Andy Martin said he believe there was a case for 03 charging to be different from 0870 and therefore he could understand why there was opposition to aligning the rates.
Geoff Brighton said that Ofcom would have to look at each dispute on its merits.
Any CP wishing to discuss the issue further is requested to raise the matter with Sean Hartley.
...