japitts wrote on Mar 22
nd, 2011 at 1:53pm:
Rewind several years and 0845/0870 numbers are created, for the genuine "non geographic" purpose and landline calls are charged according to distance. Landline calls then get "flatrated", local & national rate become obsolete but 0845 & especially 0870 slowly become "money grabbing" numbers.
According to distance applicable for those who make their calls with BT (which was the majority).
japitts wrote on Mar 22
nd, 2011 at 1:53pm:
After a while, BT include them for good PR purposes but all other operators still charge. 03 is introduced and very slowly starts to become more widely known. Ofcom abolish the ability to revenue-share on 0845 & 0870 while 03x begins to take hold. But now firms begin to move to 0844 & 0871 if they were "in it" for the money, and 03x if they have any morals.
Revenue sharing has not been removed on 0845 numbers; it was only taken away on 0870 numbers.
japitts wrote on Mar 22
nd, 2011 at 1:53pm:
Surely the underlying problem is the money-grabbing companies/organisations, the great British public who "put up" with it, and a regulatory system that lets it all happen. Telcos beginning to offer the option of including 0845 & 0870 (I think Voda might also offer something similar for business accounts) is only putting a sticking plaster on, just as 0844 & 0871 are becoming more common...
The underlying problem is the way in which the users (and providers) of these numbers cling to the out-dated idea that BT charges are the norm.
This is despite the so-called "free-market" where different telcos interconnect (thereby allowing callers of one provider to ring customers of others). It means that providers and users of these numbers show little regard for any free-market choice when making their selection of numbers.
The sooner the regulation on BT is lifted which means it charges a low level for Business Rate numbers, and a system with clarity is introduced that works equally with all call providers, the better.