SilentCallsVictim wrote on Jul 17
th, 2015 at 1:30pm:
It seems that this practice has a contract with Daisy (formerly NEG) and uses the Surgery Line system.
We have repeatedly published the following statement from the Senior Press Officer of Daisy Group (issued on 12 June 2013)
Quote:1. Surgery Line customers are NOT forced to continue using 0844 numbers until their long-term contracts end - it is open to them to move to a geographic number on request
2. Such customers can switch, free of charge, to numbers charged at the geographic rate
It was subsequently confirmed that this was a reference to switching their 0844 number - not simply adding a second number alongside.
Further to this post, I have reason to believe that Daisy Group CAN change the telephone number
without any charge to an 020 number,
however (and this is not a justification of the use of the 0844 number) any surgery that simply changes to a Geographic number looses the queueing facility. Clearly this is NEG/Daisy's "fault", as the telecom's provider, in making sure they get maximum revenue out of the contract which they provided to the GP Practice.
I am sure there are other methods of retaining the queueing facility but not without additional costs involved.
It would therefore be reasonable to suggest that a Surgery would inform it's patients (especially those who call in) that they will no longer be able to hold to speak to someone and will now get an engaged tone, before it then confirms the changes to NEG/Daisy Group.
Important NoteThe purpose of this post is to highlight that not
all GP Surgeries are at fault in presently retaining these numbers, they maybe in active conversation with their Telecoms Provider and are attempting to make the necessary changes to benefit their patients (will cheaper call charges) whilst still giving them the ability to get through easily.
----------------------------
All of the above is my opinion on this situation.