Quote:The DH has been assured by the main phone service supplier, NEG (Network Europe Group, a national provider of telephony services such as Surgery Line), that this is the case. This does not mean that the use of 084 numbers in itself has been banned. As long as the tariff is equivalent to local rates, and the practice obtains a written guarantee from their phone supplier (usually NEG) that they are charging rates in line with local geographic calls, then they will be deemed to have fulfilled their medical services contract."
There is no such thing a "local rate" and hasn't been for many years. However, there is a "geographic rate" and calls to that cost less than calling 0844 numbers. Where callers have inclusive minutes they pay nothing for the individual call when calling 01/02/03 numbers. 0844 numbers are banned.
Quote:The Department of health has not banned the use of 084 numbers in the NHS.
Yes they have. The
Secretary of State recently said:
We have made it very clear that GPs should not be using 0844 numbers for that purpose and charging patients for them.http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2012-03-27a.1326.4&s=%28no+OR+not%29+A... Quote:In fact, both at the time that the Department announced the results of its consultation on the use of 084 numbers and subsequently in parliamentary written answers, DH's repeated stated position is that
"NHS organisations remain free to use non-geographical number ranges such as 084, providing that patients are not charged more than the equivalent cost of calling a geographical number to do so."
They did this based on the false assurance that most calls to 0844 numbers cost the same as 01/02/03 numbers. This can easily be shown to be untrue. Additionally, 'most calls' no longer cuts it as the "arrangement as a whole" has to be considered.
Quote:The reason why DH has adopted this position is that, contrary to the myths propagated by anti-084 campaigners, 084 numbers are not always more expensive to call than a geographic number.
They are almost always more expensive. The vast majority of callers pay more or substantially more to call 0844 than to call 01/02/03 numbers. There are very few circumstances where this is not the case.
Quote:OFCOM has looked into this matter on several occasions and, as recently as December 2010, have stated that
“calls to geographic numbers can be as high as 8.5pm with a call set up fee of up to 11p (fixed) and up to 25 ppm (mobile), and 084 numbers can be as low as 0.5ppm with a call set up fee of 3p (fixed) and 20ppm mobile.”
While this might be the case, stating the lowest price for 0844 and the highest price for 01/02/03 numbers hides one fact. These are unusual prices: for the vast majority of callers, 0844 will always be more. For callers with inclusive minutes this is especially so as they cannot use them to call 0844 numbers.
Quote:OFCOM are also aware that the general public vastly overestimate the general cost of calling 084 numbers, stating
"Not only are consumers generally uncertain of non-geographic rate retail prices, many tend to overestimate non-geographic prices. For example, the price expected on average by callers for an 0845 call was 30ppm for calls from a landline and 46ppm for calls from a mobile."
Whether they over-estimate the cost or not is completely irrelevent. And why mention 0845, we're talking about 0844 here. The fact is 0844 numbers do cost more than calling a geographic number, and are therefore banned.
Quote:The telephony provider therefore has the ability, if they so choose, to set the rate at which a call to their number is charged at the geographic rate or below.
No they do not. There's the little business of the "premium" which the caller has to pay to the GPs service provider. If the callers provider were to absorb that cost, they would have to make a loss on every 0844 call they handled.
Quote:This was recognised in the DH response to the 084 numbers consultation, which stated
“some providers have chosen to charge no more for an 084 call than a call to a geographic number when dialing from a fixed line”.
This is very misleading. The GPs provider can set only the amount of premium the caller will pay on top of the normal price for the call. The callers provider sets the actual call cost that the caller will pay.
Quote:This is precisely what NEG have done and, in doing so, have complied with the DH regulations and the relevant BMA guidance to its members issued on 8th January 2010.
NEG do not have to comply with anything the BMA has said, especially when BMA guidance is both misleading and incorrect. NEG has to comply with the provisions of the GMS contract issued by DoH. In that regard, they are not compliant.