kasg wrote on Jun 13
th, 2013 at 8:31pm:
CJT-80 wrote on Jun 13
th, 2013 at 3:24pm:
I personally find it incomprehensible why HMRC has chosen to replace the 0845 numbers with 0300 numbers instead of arranging for the appropriate and matching 0345 number to be activated. Could it be that even an establishment such as the HMRC and Government cannot persuade their telecoms provider to arrange this?
They managed it for the Tax Credits helpline.
… and we have yet to see what will be done with the remainder of the numbers.
There is obviously some benefit in having new memorable 0300 numbers; the difficulties of changing can be relieved by taking the 034 option. I am always pleased to see examples of the latter, as these help to counter arguments about the difficulty of changing. I must however live with my disappointment if HMRC chooses the former.
Without knowing exactly how HMRC balanced the arguments to come to the decision to take the 0300 option in the cases done this week, and those done in April, we are obviously unable to understand the decision. This is a point of some academic interest, especially as migration to the equivalent 034 numbers could have been a little more valuable to those of us who are keen to use HMRC as an example to others. It is however of no material relevance to those who call these numbers.
I am not aware of any evidence to show that the new telephone service provider to HMRC, now perhaps a different division of its previous provider, has in any way impeded the possibility of the 0345 option being taken.
I believe that there is an important and very closely related relevant current issue that could be worthy of discussion in this forum, however that is a matter for members to decide. Members may only express opinions on issues which are of concern to them.
The fair telecoms campaign does not seek to represent views expressed in this forum any more or less than any other external source of opinion on the matters it covers. It most certainly does not reflect the apparent balance of priorities reflected by postings. It publishes
a news feed covering matters that are not discussed here. We hope that those interested in following the matters covered by the campaign find it to be of value, and of assistance to their personal campaigning efforts. That is the primary reason for putting in the work to maintain its presentation and content.
Although I may express an opinion here, like any other member of this forum, it cannot be for the fair telecoms campaign to suggest or limit the issues which members think worthy of discussion in the forum. If people are happy (or prefer) to get simple news postings from a site supported by advertising, then that must be their free choice. The advertisers rely on those who follow the news to make the postings necessary to attract the hits.