Ian G
|
They do financially benefit from the call. There is a Service Charge (around 7p/min inc VAT) within the call price, and their provider uses at least part of it to pay the running costs of the number.
Ofcom will shortly require users of 084, 087 and 09 numbers to declare the Service Charge wherever their number is advertised.
If they are not receiving the 2p/min, or so, revenue share that a "g6" number normally pays out, they should ask their provider where that money is going.
While they may think the call cost is "reasonable", the law does not. From 13 June 2014, it will be illegal to offer 084, 087 and 09 numbers for customer service lines. No ban on using them for sales, but when faced with calling a high-price line when buying, many people would choose to shop elsewhere.
All of the features they claim they need on their phone service are available on all 03, 08, and 09 numbers. With an 03 number, the business pays for those features rather than tricking the caller into paying for them.
The cost of calling the 084 number is "unreasonable". As there is a Service Charge to pay, the call does not count towards inclusive minutes on landlines or on mobiles.
Nowadays, the normal cost of a call is zero. Calls to 01, 02 and 03 numbers count towards inclusive allowances on landlines and mobiles. Calls to 084, 087 and 09 numbers usually do not.
The ASA will be interested in the false "national rate" claim and the fact that the ex-VAT call price has been quoted without making that clear. They haven't mentioned the 15p connection fee, but ASA never seem to be worried about that omission.
They also claim (on their website) the "4.2p/min" cost applies from "landlines". The same call can cost up to 12p/min from landlines that are not on BT.
Calls to the 0844 number incur a "premium" cost. Whether ASA take action on their claim the number is "not premium" is another matter.
In response to the recent email, the cost from mobiles is not "20p". It is up to 41p/min.
|